Meller Robert, Simon Roger P
Translational Stroke Program, Neuroscience Institute, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; and
Translational Stroke Program, Neuroscience Institute, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; and Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015 Nov 15;119(10):1135-42. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00169.2015. Epub 2015 May 7.
Remote preconditioning (rPC) is the phenomenon whereby brief organ ischemia evokes an endogenous response such that a different (remote) organ is protected against subsequent, normally injurious ischemia. Experiments show rPC to be effective at evoking cardioprotection against ischemic heart injury and, more recently, neuroprotection against brain ischemia. Such is the enthusiasm for rPC that human studies have been initiated. Clinical trials suggest rPC to be safe (phase II trial) and effective in reducing stroke incidence in a population with high stroke risk. However, despite the therapeutic potential of rPC, there is a large gap in knowledge regarding the effector mechanisms of rPC and how it might be orchestrated to improve outcome after stroke. Here we provide a critical review of mechanisms that are directly attributable to rPC-induced neuroprotection in preclinical trials of rPC.
远程预处理(rPC)是一种现象,即短暂的器官缺血引发内源性反应,从而使不同的(远程)器官免受随后通常具有损伤性的缺血影响。实验表明,rPC在引发针对缺血性心脏损伤的心脏保护作用方面有效,并且最近在针对脑缺血的神经保护方面也有效。人们对rPC的热情如此之高,以至于已经启动了人体研究。临床试验表明,rPC是安全的(II期试验),并且在降低中风高危人群的中风发病率方面有效。然而,尽管rPC具有治疗潜力,但在rPC的效应机制以及如何对其进行调控以改善中风后的预后方面,仍存在很大的知识空白。在此,我们对rPC临床前试验中直接归因于rPC诱导的神经保护作用的机制进行了批判性综述。