Suppr超能文献

两种区域疼痛控制技术在小儿足部手术中的疗效

Efficacy of 2 Regional Pain Control Techniques in Pediatric Foot Surgery.

作者信息

Lloyd Chandra H, Srinath Arjun K, Muchow Ryan D, Iwinski Henry J, Talwalkar Vishwas R, Walker Janet L, Montgomery Christopher, Milbrandt Todd

机构信息

*Shriners Hospitals for Children ‡University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY †Cleveland Clinic, Weston, FL §Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 2016 Oct-Nov;36(7):720-4. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000517.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have the potential to reduce postoperative pain. The use of ultrasound (US) to guide PNBs may be more beneficial than nerve stimulation (NS); however, very few studies have studied this technique in children. The objective of this study was to compare postoperative pain control in pediatric patients who had general anesthesia (GA) alone compared with those who had PNB performed by NS, or PNB with both NS and US guidance. Our hypothesis was that compared with NS, the US-guided PNB would result in reduced postoperative pain and opioid use, and that both PNB conditions would have improved outcomes compared with GA.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of foot and ankle surgery included 103 patients who were stratified into 3 groups: GA, PNB with NS, and PNB with NS and US. Pain levels were measured with visual pain scales at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Days of hospitalization, morphine and oxycodone use by weight, and time to first PRN opioid use were also recorded. A repeated measure analysis of variance was used to compare the groups, and the proportion of patients who reported a visual analog scale score of 0 was calculated for each time point.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in pain levels between groups for the first 12 hours, but the US group had higher pain levels at 24 hours. Both US and NS groups had a longer time to PRN opioid use and used significantly less morphine compared with GA. The US group had a significantly greater proportion of pain-free patients than the other 2 groups for the first 6 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of US guidance is beneficial in postoperative pain control. Both US-guided and NS-guided PNB are preferable to GA alone for lower extremity orthopaedic surgery in the pediatric population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative study.

摘要

背景

外周神经阻滞(PNB)有减轻术后疼痛的潜力。使用超声(US)引导PNB可能比神经刺激(NS)更有益;然而,很少有研究在儿童中研究这种技术。本研究的目的是比较单纯接受全身麻醉(GA)的儿科患者与接受NS引导的PNB或NS和US联合引导的PNB的患者的术后疼痛控制情况。我们的假设是,与NS相比,US引导的PNB将导致术后疼痛减轻和阿片类药物使用减少,并且两种PNB情况与GA相比都会有更好的结果。

方法

对足踝手术进行回顾性病历审查,纳入103例患者,分为3组:GA组、NS引导的PNB组和NS与US联合引导的PNB组。术后2、4、6、8、12和24小时用视觉疼痛量表测量疼痛程度。还记录了住院天数、按体重计算的吗啡和羟考酮使用量以及首次按需使用阿片类药物的时间。采用重复测量方差分析比较各组,并计算每个时间点报告视觉模拟量表评分为0的患者比例。

结果

在前12小时,各组之间的疼痛程度无显著差异,但US组在24小时时疼痛程度较高。与GA组相比,US组和NS组按需使用阿片类药物的时间更长,吗啡使用量显著更少。在前6小时,US组无痛患者的比例明显高于其他两组。

结论

使用US引导有助于术后疼痛控制。对于儿科人群的下肢骨科手术,US引导和NS引导的PNB均优于单纯GA。

证据水平

III级,回顾性比较研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验