Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health - Jersey City Medical Center, Jersey City, NJ.
Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health - Jersey City Medical Center, Jersey City, NJ.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Jan-Feb;60(1):121-131. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.08.026. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature examining postoperative outcomes following single site and combined peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), including (1) sciatic and femoral nerve, (2) popliteal and saphenous nerve, and (3) popliteal and ankle nerve, during elective foot and ankle surgery. We hypothesized that combination blocks would decrease postoperative narcotic consumption and afford more effective postoperative pain control as compared to general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, or single site PNBs. A review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2009 to October 2019. We identified studies by using synonyms for "foot," "ankle" "pain management," "opioid," and "nerve block." Included articles explicitly focused on elective foot and ankle procedures performed under general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, PNB, or with some combination of these techniques. PNB techniques included femoral, adductor canal, sciatic, popliteal, saphenous, and ankle blocks, as well as blocks that combined multiple anatomic sites. Outcomes measured included postoperative narcotic consumption as well as patient-reported efficacy of pain control. Twenty-eight studies encompassing 6703 patients were included. Of the included studies, 57% were randomized controlled trials, 18% were prospective comparison studies, and 25% were retrospective comparison studies. Postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative pain levels were reduced over the first 24 to 48 hours with the use of combined PNBs when compared with single site PNBs, both when used as primary anesthesia or when used in concert with general anesthesia either alone or combined with systemic/local anesthesia in the first 24 to 48 hours following surgery. Studies demonstrated higher reported patient satisfaction of postoperative pain control in patients who received combined PNB. Nine of 14 (64%) studies reported no neurologic related complications with an overall reported rate among all studies ranging from 0% to 41%. Our study identified substantial improvement in postoperative pain levels, postoperative opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction in patients receiving PNB when compared with patients who did not receive PNB. Published data also demonstrated that combination PNB are more effective than single-site PNB for all data points. Notably, the addition of a femoral nerve block to a popliteal nerve block during use of a thigh tourniquet, as well as addition of either saphenous or ankle blockade to popliteal nerve block during use of calf tourniquet, may increase overall block effectiveness. Serious complications including neurologic damage following PNB administration are rare but do exist.
本研究的目的是系统回顾文献,检查单次部位和联合外周神经阻滞(PNB)术后结果,包括(1)坐骨神经和股神经,(2)隐神经和大隐神经,以及(3)隐神经和踝神经,用于择期足踝手术。我们假设与全身麻醉、脊髓麻醉或单一部位 PNB 相比,联合阻滞会减少术后阿片类药物的消耗并提供更有效的术后疼痛控制。根据 PRISMA 指南进行文献复习。从 2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 10 月,对 Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了检索。我们使用同义词“foot”、“ankle”、“pain management”、“opioid”和“nerve block”来确定研究。纳入的文章明确侧重于全身麻醉、脊髓麻醉、PNB 下或联合使用这些技术进行的择期足踝手术。PNB 技术包括股神经、收肌管、坐骨神经、隐神经、大隐神经和踝部阻滞,以及结合多个解剖部位的阻滞。测量的结果包括术后阿片类药物的消耗以及患者报告的疼痛控制效果。纳入了 28 项研究,共 6703 名患者。纳入的研究中,57%为随机对照试验,18%为前瞻性对照研究,25%为回顾性对照研究。与单一部位 PNB 相比,联合 PNB 可减少术后 24 至 48 小时内的术后阿片类药物消耗和术后疼痛水平,无论是作为主要麻醉剂使用,还是与全身麻醉联合使用,单独使用或与全身/局部麻醉联合使用,在术后 24 至 48 小时内。研究表明,接受联合 PNB 的患者对术后疼痛控制的报告满意度更高。14 项研究中有 9 项(64%)没有报告与神经相关的并发症,所有研究的总体报告率在 0%至 41%之间。与未接受 PNB 的患者相比,本研究发现接受 PNB 的患者术后疼痛水平、术后阿片类药物消耗和患者满意度均有显著改善。已发表的数据还表明,联合 PNB 在所有数据点上均比单一部位 PNB 更有效。值得注意的是,在使用大腿止血带时,将股神经阻滞添加到隐神经阻滞中,以及在使用小腿止血带时将隐神经阻滞添加到隐神经或踝部阻滞中,可能会增加整体阻滞效果。尽管神经损伤等严重并发症在 PNB 治疗后很少见,但确实存在。