Shih Shirley L, Gerrard Paul, Goldstein Richard, Mix Jacqueline, Ryan Colleen M, Niewczyk Paulette, Kazis Lewis, Hefner Jaye, Ackerly D Clay, Zafonte Ross, Schneider Jeffrey C
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1688-95. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3350-2. Epub 2015 May 9.
To examine functional status versus medical comorbidities as predictors of acute care readmissions in medically complex patients.
Retrospective database study.
U.S. inpatient rehabilitation facilities.
Subjects included 120,957 patients in the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation admitted to inpatient rehabilitation facilities under the medically complex impairment group code between 2002 and 2011.
A Basic Model based on gender and functional status was developed using logistic regression to predict the odds of 3-, 7-, and 30-day readmission from inpatient rehabilitation facilities to acute care hospitals. Functional status was measured by the FIM(®) motor score. The Basic Model was compared to six other predictive models-three Basic Plus Models that added a comorbidity measure to the Basic Model and three Gender-Comorbidity Models that included only gender and a comorbidity measure. The three comorbidity measures used were the Elixhauser index, Deyo-Charlson index, and Medicare comorbidity tier system. The c-statistic was the primary measure of model performance.
We investigated 3-, 7-, and 30-day readmission to acute care hospitals from inpatient rehabilitation facilities.
Basic Model c-statistics predicting 3-, 7-, and 30-day readmissions were 0.69, 0.64, and 0.65, respectively. The best-performing Basic Plus Model (Basic+Elixhauser) c-statistics were only 0.02 better than the Basic Model, and the best-performing Gender-Comorbidity Model (Gender+Elixhauser) c-statistics were more than 0.07 worse than the Basic Model.
Readmission models based on functional status consistently outperform models based on medical comorbidities. There is opportunity to improve current national readmission risk models to more accurately predict readmissions by incorporating functional data.
研究功能状态与合并症作为病情复杂患者急性护理再入院预测因素的情况。
回顾性数据库研究。
美国住院康复机构。
研究对象包括2002年至2011年间在统一医学康复数据系统中,按照病情复杂损伤组代码入住住院康复机构的120957名患者。
使用逻辑回归开发了一个基于性别和功能状态的基础模型,以预测从住院康复机构到急性护理医院3天、7天和30天再入院的几率。功能状态通过FIM(®)运动评分进行测量。将基础模型与其他六个预测模型进行比较——三个基础增强模型,即在基础模型中添加了合并症测量指标;三个性别-合并症模型,即仅包括性别和合并症测量指标。使用的三个合并症测量指标分别是埃利克斯豪泽指数、戴约-查尔森指数和医疗保险合并症分级系统。c统计量是模型性能的主要衡量指标。
我们调查了从住院康复机构到急性护理医院的3天、7天和30天再入院情况。
预测3天、7天和30天再入院的基础模型c统计量分别为0.69、0.64和0.65。表现最佳的基础增强模型(基础+埃利克斯豪泽模型)c统计量仅比基础模型高0.02,而表现最佳的性别-合并症模型(性别+埃利克斯豪泽模型)c统计量比基础模型低0.07以上。
基于功能状态的再入院模型始终优于基于合并症的模型。通过纳入功能数据来改进当前的国家再入院风险模型,有机会更准确地预测再入院情况。