Alves Eliana, Esteves Ana Cristina, Correia António, Cunha Ângela, Faustino Maria A F, Neves Maria G P M S, Almeida Adelaide
Department of Biology & Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2015 Jun;14(6):1169-78. doi: 10.1039/c4pp00194j.
Oxidative stress induced by photodynamic treatment of microbial cells causes irreversible damages to vital cellular components such as proteins. Photodynamic inactivation (PDI) of bacteria, a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of superficial and localized skin and oral infections, can be achieved by exciting a photosensitizing agent with visible light in an oxygenated environment. Although some studies have addressed the oxidative alterations of PDI in bacterial proteins, the present study is the first to compare the electrophoretic profiles of proteins of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, having two structurally different porphyrins, with different kinetics of photoinactivation. The cationic porphyrins 5,10,15-tris(1-methylpyridinium-4-yl)-20-(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin tri-iodide (Tri-Py(+)-Me-PF) and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(1-methylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin tetra-iodide (Tetra-Py(+)-Me) were used to photosensitize Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus warneri upon white light irradiation at an irradiance of 4.0 mW cm(-2). After different photosensitization periods, proteins were extracted from bacteria and analyzed using one-dimensional SDS-PAGE. Apparent molecular weights and band intensities were determined after an irradiation period corresponding to a reduction of 4 log10 in cell viability. After photodynamic treatment, there was a general loss of bacterial proteins, assigned to large-scale protein degradation. Protein loss was more pronounced after PDI with Tri-Py(+)-Me-PF in both bacteria. There was also an increase in the concentration of some proteins as well as an increase in the molecular weight of other proteins. We show that proteins of E. coli and S. warneri are important targets of PDI. Although there is an attempt of cellular response to the PDI-induced damage by overexpression of a limited number of proteins, the damage is lethal. Our results show that changes occurring in the protein pattern during photodynamic treatment are different with the two photosensitizers, which helps to explain the different inactivation kinetics of the two bacteria. SDS-PAGE is a rational approach to assign the type of cellular response to stress that is being induced in the cells.
光动力疗法对微生物细胞诱导产生的氧化应激会对蛋白质等重要细胞成分造成不可逆损伤。细菌的光动力失活(PDI)是一种治疗浅表和局部皮肤及口腔感染的有前景的治疗方法,可通过在含氧环境中用可见光激发光敏剂来实现。尽管一些研究探讨了细菌蛋白质中PDI的氧化改变,但本研究首次比较了具有两种结构不同卟啉且光失活动力学不同的革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌蛋白质的电泳图谱。使用阳离子卟啉5,10,15-三(1-甲基吡啶鎓-4-基)-20-(五氟苯基)卟啉三碘化物(Tri-Py(+)-Me-PF)和5,10,15,20-四(1-甲基吡啶鎓-4-基)卟啉四碘化物(Tetra-Py(+)-Me),在4.0 mW cm(-2)的辐照度下对白光照射的大肠杆菌和沃氏葡萄球菌进行光敏化处理。在不同的光敏化时间段后,从细菌中提取蛋白质并使用一维SDS-PAGE进行分析。在对应细胞活力降低4个对数级的照射时间段后,测定表观分子量和条带强度。光动力处理后,细菌蛋白质普遍损失,这归因于大规模的蛋白质降解。在两种细菌中,用Tri-Py(+)-Me-PF进行PDI后蛋白质损失更为明显。还观察到一些蛋白质浓度增加以及其他蛋白质分子量增加。我们表明大肠杆菌和沃氏葡萄球菌的蛋白质是PDI的重要靶点。尽管细胞试图通过有限数量蛋白质的过表达来应对PDI诱导的损伤,但这种损伤是致命的。我们的结果表明,在光动力处理期间蛋白质模式的变化在两种光敏剂作用下有所不同,这有助于解释两种细菌不同的失活动力学。SDS-PAGE是一种合理的方法,可用于确定细胞中正在诱导的应激的细胞反应类型。