• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良脓毒症集束化治疗在感染性休克治疗中的应用:一项前瞻性临床研究。

Improved sepsis bundles in the treatment of septic shock: a prospective clinical study.

作者信息

Lu Nian-Fang, Zheng Rui-Qiang, Lin Hua, Shao Jun, Yu Jiang-Quan, Yang De-Gang

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Electric Power Hospital, Beijing 100073, China.

Intensive Care Unit, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Medical School of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225001, China.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;33(8):1045-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.031. Epub 2015 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.031
PMID:25959848
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis bundles can decrease mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. However, current methods of measuring pressure, such as central venous pressure, are inadequate. This study investigated the effect of improved sepsis bundles informed by pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output.

METHODS

We compared the outcome of treatment with sepsis bundles informed by either conventional pressure measurements or pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output. Patients in 2 groups received fluid resuscitation, standard antibiotics, and oxygen therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients with septic shock were randomly divided into 2 groups: the conventional sepsis bundle group (n = 52) or the improved sepsis bundle group (ISBG, n =53). The ISBG significantly reduced the mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment scores. Significantly fewer ISBG-treated patients received vasoactive drugs compared to conventional sepsis bundle group-treated patients. In addition, patients in the ISBG exhibited a significantly increased arterial blood lactate clearance rate and required less total fluid resuscitation and a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and stay in the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output-directed sepsis bundles can reduce the severity of septic shock, provide more accurate fluid resuscitation, and reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and stay in the intensive care unit.

摘要

背景

脓毒症集束化治疗可降低严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的死亡率。然而,目前测量压力的方法,如中心静脉压,并不充分。本研究调查了基于脉搏指示连续心输出量的改良脓毒症集束化治疗的效果。

方法

我们比较了采用传统压力测量或脉搏指示连续心输出量指导的脓毒症集束化治疗的结果。两组患者均接受液体复苏、标准抗生素治疗和氧疗。

结果

总共105例脓毒性休克患者被随机分为两组:传统脓毒症集束化治疗组(n = 52)和改良脓毒症集束化治疗组(ISBG,n = 53)。改良脓毒症集束化治疗组显著降低了平均急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)及脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。与传统脓毒症集束化治疗组相比,改良脓毒症集束化治疗组接受血管活性药物治疗的患者明显减少。此外,改良脓毒症集束化治疗组患者的动脉血乳酸清除率显著提高,总液体复苏量减少,机械通气时间和重症监护病房住院时间缩短。

结论

基于脉搏指示连续心输出量指导的脓毒症集束化治疗可降低脓毒性休克的严重程度,提供更准确的液体复苏,并缩短机械通气时间和重症监护病房住院时间。

相似文献

1
Improved sepsis bundles in the treatment of septic shock: a prospective clinical study.改良脓毒症集束化治疗在感染性休克治疗中的应用:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;33(8):1045-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.031. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
2
[Clinical studies of surviving sepsis bundles according to PiCCO on septic shock patients].[基于脉搏指示连续心输出量监测(PiCCO)的脓毒症拯救集束化治疗对感染性休克患者的临床研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Jan;26(1):23-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.01.005.
3
Hemodynamic monitoring and mortality.
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;33(10):1520-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.07.034. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
4
Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中复苏集束化治疗的依从性:可提高生存率,亡羊补牢,为时未晚。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):304-13. doi: 10.1177/0885066610392499. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
5
[Value of pulse indicator continuous cardiac output monitoring of cardiac function in septic shock patients: a prospective study].[脉搏指示连续心输出量监测在脓毒症休克患者心功能评估中的价值:一项前瞻性研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Jan;27(1):22-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2015.01.006.
6
[Comparison of the effect of fluid resuscitation as guided either by lactate clearance rate or by central venous oxygen saturation in patients with sepsis].[脓毒症患者中以乳酸清除率或中心静脉血氧饱和度为导向的液体复苏效果比较]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013 Oct;25(10):578-83. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2013.10.002.
7
Effects of fluid resuscitation with synthetic colloids or crystalloids alone on shock reversal, fluid balance, and patient outcomes in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective sequential analysis.单独使用合成胶体或晶体液复苏对严重脓毒症休克逆转、液体平衡和患者结局的影响:一项前瞻性序贯分析。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2543-51. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318258fee7.
8
Effect of two volume responsiveness evaluation methods on fluid resuscitation and prognosis in septic shock patients.两种容量反应性评估方法对感染性休克患者液体复苏及预后的影响。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(3):483-7.
9
[The impact of sepsis bundles on mortality in patients with sepsis shock: a prospective clinical study].[脓毒症集束化治疗对脓毒症休克患者死亡率的影响:一项前瞻性临床研究]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2008 Sep;20(9):534-7.
10
Volume-limited versus pressure-limited hemodynamic management in septic and nonseptic shock.容量限制与压力限制血流动力学管理在感染性和非感染性休克中的应用。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):1177-85. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc5f9.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Pulse Indicator Continuous Cardiac Output Monitoring on Septic Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis.脉搏指示连续心输出量监测对感染性休克患者的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Apr 16;2022:8604322. doi: 10.1155/2022/8604322. eCollection 2022.
2
Vasopressor-Sparing Strategies in Patients with Shock: A Scoping-Review and an Evidence-Based Strategy Proposition.休克患者的血管活性药物节省策略:一项范围综述及基于证据的策略建议
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 18;10(14):3164. doi: 10.3390/jcm10143164.
3
Differences in Hypotensive vs. Non-Hypotensive Sepsis Management in the Emergency Department: Door-to-Antibiotic Time Impact on Sepsis Survival.
急诊科低血压性与非低血压性脓毒症管理的差异:从就诊到使用抗生素的时间对脓毒症存活的影响。
Med Sci (Basel). 2018 Oct 10;6(4):91. doi: 10.3390/medsci6040091.
4
Unexplained mortality differences between septic shock trials: a systematic analysis of population characteristics and control-group mortality rates.不明原因的脓毒性休克试验死亡率差异:人群特征和对照组死亡率的系统分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Mar;44(3):311-322. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5134-8. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
5
Control groups in recent septic shock trials: a systematic review.近期脓毒症休克试验中的对照组:一项系统性综述。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1912-1921. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4444-y. Epub 2016 Jul 23.
6
Lactate Clearance Predicts Survival Among Patients in the Emergency Department with Severe Sepsis.乳酸清除率可预测急诊科严重脓毒症患者的生存率。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;16(7):1118-26. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.10.27577. Epub 2015 Dec 8.