• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜检查在小儿阑尾炎治疗中的作用:波兰小儿外科医生的一项调查

The role of laparoscopy in the management of pediatric appendicitis: a survey of Polish pediatric surgeons.

作者信息

Golebiewski Andrzej, Czauderna Piotr

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Urology for Children and Adolescents, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.

出版信息

Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015 Apr;10(1):101-6. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.47510. Epub 2014 Dec 4.

DOI:10.5114/wiitm.2014.47510
PMID:25960800
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4414095/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite the increase in use of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in recent years, until now no nationwide survey on this issue has been performed in Poland.

AIM

To determine current surgical practice patterns among Polish pediatric surgeons in the treatment of appendicitis in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The nationwide survey was conducted in the form of an internet questionnaire asking for information concerning treatment of children suspected of having acute appendicitis in the years 2007-2011. Twenty-seven major pediatric surgical departments in Poland were invited to participate in the study.

RESULTS

The overall survey response rate was 70.37%. Laparoscopic appendectomy was offered in all departments except one. Laparoscopy was used in 33% of cases and was the standard procedure in 4 departments. In 1 center 100% of appendectomies were performed laparoscopically. The 3-port technique was used in all departments. Five centers offered transumbilical laparoscopic extracorporeal appendectomy and 2 centers single-port appendectomy. In LA the mesoappendix was mostly divided using bipolar or monopolar coagulation and the appendix was ligated using endoloops or was clipped. The mean hospitalization time was 3.31 days after laparoscopy and 5.47 days after open appendectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite an apparent consensus on some aspects of pediatric appendicitis among Polish pediatric surgeons, significant inconsistency exists in the operative approach. The low rate of LA suggests that LA still remains far from being a standard. Personal experience and preference have a major influence on the choice of operative approach. It is recommended that national guidelines be set up, which could standardize the care for children and training of pediatric surgery residents.

摘要

引言

尽管近年来腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)的使用有所增加,但迄今为止波兰尚未就这一问题进行全国性调查。

目的

确定波兰小儿外科医生在儿童阑尾炎治疗方面当前的手术实践模式。

材料与方法

全国性调查以网络问卷的形式进行,询问有关2007 - 2011年疑似患有急性阑尾炎儿童的治疗信息。邀请了波兰27个主要的小儿外科科室参与研究。

结果

总体调查回复率为70.37%。除一个科室外,所有科室都提供腹腔镜阑尾切除术。33%的病例采用了腹腔镜手术,4个科室将其作为标准手术方式。在1个中心,100%的阑尾切除术是通过腹腔镜进行的。所有科室均采用三孔技术。5个中心提供经脐腹腔镜体外阑尾切除术,2个中心提供单孔阑尾切除术。在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中,阑尾系膜大多使用双极或单极电凝进行分离,阑尾使用圈套器结扎或夹闭。腹腔镜手术后平均住院时间为3.31天,开腹阑尾切除术后为5.47天。

结论

尽管波兰小儿外科医生在小儿阑尾炎的某些方面似乎已达成共识,但手术方式仍存在显著差异。腹腔镜阑尾切除术的低使用率表明其仍远未成为标准术式。个人经验和偏好对手术方式的选择有重大影响。建议制定国家指南,以规范儿童护理及小儿外科住院医师培训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e31/4414095/95f2e815cc84/WIITM-10-24114-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e31/4414095/eaa6a50c44ff/WIITM-10-24114-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e31/4414095/970e79f60cd2/WIITM-10-24114-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e31/4414095/95f2e815cc84/WIITM-10-24114-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e31/4414095/eaa6a50c44ff/WIITM-10-24114-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e31/4414095/970e79f60cd2/WIITM-10-24114-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e31/4414095/95f2e815cc84/WIITM-10-24114-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of laparoscopy in the management of pediatric appendicitis: a survey of Polish pediatric surgeons.腹腔镜检查在小儿阑尾炎治疗中的作用:波兰小儿外科医生的一项调查
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015 Apr;10(1):101-6. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2014.47510. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
2
Current status of laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a nation wide survey in Germany.儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术的现状:德国全国性调查
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Jun;23(3):226-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333121. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
3
Current management of pediatric appendicitis: A Central European survey.小儿阑尾炎的当前管理:一项中欧调查。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020 Jun;29(6):745-750. doi: 10.17219/acem/122176.
4
Transumbilical extracorporeal laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy.经脐体外腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Feb;53(2):256-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
5
Management of the normal-appearing appendix during laparoscopy for clinically suspected acute appendicitis in the pediatric population.小儿腹腔镜下临床疑似急性阑尾炎时正常阑尾的处理。
J Pediatr Surg. 2020 May;55(5):893-898. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.01.039. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
6
Appendectomy in the pediatric population-a German nationwide cohort analysis.儿科人群的阑尾切除术——一项德国全国性队列分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Aug;401(5):651-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1430-3. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
7
Appendectomy in Germany-an analysis of a nationwide survey 2011/2012.德国的阑尾切除术——2011/2012 年全国调查分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;28(1):127-38. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1573-9. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
8
Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy: an alternative minimally invasive technique in pediatric patients.经脐腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术:小儿患者的一种替代性微创技术。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Dec;20(10):873-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0147. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a retrospective comparative study of 2,332 cases.儿童腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:2332例回顾性比较研究
World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):750-5. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0699-8.
10
Is mini-laparoscopic appendectomy feasible for children.小儿迷你腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否可行?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004 Apr;14(2):61-5. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200404000-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of treatment costs of laparoscopic and open surgery.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗费用的比较。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015 Sep;10(3):437-41. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2015.54055. Epub 2015 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

1
One, two or three port appendectomy - a rational approach.单孔、两孔或三孔阑尾切除术——一种合理的方法。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2013 Sep;8(3):226-31. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2011.33991. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
2
Current status of laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a nation wide survey in Germany.儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术的现状:德国全国性调查
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Jun;23(3):226-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333121. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
3
National trends in approach and outcomes with appendicitis in children.儿童阑尾炎治疗方法和结局的全国性趋势。
J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Dec;47(12):2264-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.09.019.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in the management of all stages of acute appendicitis in children: a retrospective study.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗儿童各期急性阑尾炎的回顾性研究。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2012 Oct;53(5):289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
5
Comparison of intraabdominal abscess formation after laparoscopic and open appendicectomies in children.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗儿童后腹腔脓肿形成的比较。
J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Feb;47(2):317-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.11.023.
6
Laparoscopic appendectomy: vascular control of the appendicular artery using monopolar cauterization versus clips.腹腔镜阑尾切除术:使用单极电灼与钛夹控制阑尾动脉的血管情况
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Mar;22(2):165-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0312. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
7
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in children: outcomes comparison based on age, sex, and perforation status.儿童腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:基于年龄、性别和穿孔状态的结局比较
Arch Surg. 2011 Oct;146(10):1118-21. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.144. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
8
Patient and surgeon factors are associated with the use of laparoscopy in appendicitis.患者和外科医生因素与阑尾炎中腹腔镜的使用相关。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;14(2):243-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02597.x.
9
Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与传统阑尾切除术的比较——随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov 3;10:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-129.
10
Port exteriorization appendectomy: is it the future?外置式阑尾切除术:它会是未来的趋势吗?
Nepal Med Coll J. 2008 Mar;10(1):30-4.