Suppr超能文献

德国的阑尾切除术——2011/2012 年全国调查分析。

Appendectomy in Germany-an analysis of a nationwide survey 2011/2012.

机构信息

Department of Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, 51109 Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;28(1):127-38. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1573-9. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although appendectomies are frequently performed and new procedural techniques have emerged, no nationwide analysis exists after the cessation of the German quality control in 2004.

METHODS

One thousand eight hundred seventy surgical hospitals in Germany were asked to answer questions anonymously concerning the size of the department, applied procedural techniques, various technical details, as well as the approach to the intraoperative finding of an inconspicuous appendix.

RESULTS

We received 643 questionnaires (34.4 %) for evaluation. Almost all hospitals (95.5 %) offer laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), 15.4 % offer single-port (SPA), and 2.2 % (hybrid-) NOTES technique (NA). LA is the standard procedure in 85.2 % of male and in 89.1 % for female patients. In an open procedure (OA), the appendix and mesoappendix are mostly ligated (93.8 and 91.5 %). A Veress needle and open access are employed equally for LA. In 66.6 % of LA, the appendix is divided using an Endo-GIA, the mesoappendix in 45.5 % with bipolar coagulation. Almost half of the hospitals routinely flush the site in OA and LA. In open surgery with an inconspicuous appendix but a pathological finding elsewhere in the abdomen, it is resected "en principe" in 64.7 % and in the absence of any pathological finding in 91.2 %. For laparoscopic procedures, the numbers are 54.8 and 88.4 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Most German hospitals perform appendectomies laparoscopically regardless of patients' gender. Usage of an Endo-GIA is widely established. SPA has not gained much acceptance, nor is NA widely used yet. In the absence of any pathological findings in particular, the macroscopically inconspicuous appendix results in an appendectomy "en principe" in most German hospitals.

摘要

引言

尽管阑尾切除术经常进行,并且出现了新的手术技术,但自 2004 年德国质量控制停止以来,尚无全国性的分析。

方法

德国的 1870 家外科医院被要求匿名回答有关科室规模、应用的手术技术、各种技术细节以及术中发现不明显阑尾的方法等问题。

结果

我们收到了 643 份(34.4%)的有效问卷。几乎所有医院(95.5%)都提供腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA),15.4%提供单孔(SPA),2.2%(混合)NOTES 技术(NA)。LA 是男性患者的标准手术(85.2%),女性患者(89.1%)。在开腹手术(OA)中,阑尾和阑尾系膜主要结扎(93.8%和 91.5%)。LA 中同样使用 Veress 针和开放通道。在 66.6%的 LA 中,使用 Endo-GIA 切断阑尾,45.5%使用双极电凝切断阑尾系膜。近一半的医院在 OA 和 LA 中常规冲洗术区。在开腹手术中,如果阑尾不明显但腹部其他部位有病理发现,则应“原则上”切除(64.7%),如果没有任何病理发现,则切除(91.2%)。对于腹腔镜手术,这些数字分别为 54.8%和 88.4%。

结论

大多数德国医院无论患者性别如何,都进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术。Endo-GIA 的使用已广泛建立。SPA 尚未得到广泛认可,NA 也尚未广泛使用。在大多数德国医院,特别是在没有任何病理发现的情况下,宏观上不明显的阑尾导致进行阑尾切除术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验