Bazemore Andrew, Petterson Stephen, Peterson Lars E, Phillips Robert L
Robert Graham Center, Washington, DC
Robert Graham Center, Washington, DC.
Ann Fam Med. 2015 May-Jun;13(3):206-13. doi: 10.1370/afm.1787.
Comprehensiveness is lauded as 1 of the 5 core virtues of primary care, but its relationship with outcomes is unclear. We measured associations between variations in comprehensiveness of practice among family physicians and healthcare utilization and costs for their Medicare beneficiaries.
We merged data from 2011 Medicare Part A and B claims files for a complex random sample of family physicians engaged in direct patient care, including 100% of their claimed care of Medicare beneficiaries, with data reported by the same physicians during their participation in Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians (MC-FP) between the years 2007 and 2011. We created a measure of comprehensiveness from mandatory self-reported survey items as part of MC-FP examination registration. We compared this measure to another derived from Medicare's Berenson-Eggers Type of Service (BETOS) codes. We then examined the association between the 2 measures of comprehensiveness and hospitalizations, Part B payments, and combined Part A and B payments.
Our full family physician sample consists of 3,652 physicians providing the plurality of care to 555,165 Medicare beneficiaries. Of these, 1,133 recertified between 2007 and 2011 and cared for 185,044 beneficiaries. There was a modest correlation (0.30) between the BETOS and self-reported comprehensiveness measures. After adjusting for beneficiary and physician characteristics, increasing comprehensiveness was associated with lower total Medicare Part A and B costs and Part B costs alone, but not with hospitalizations; the association with spending was stronger for the BETOS measure than for the self-reported measure; higher BETOS scores significantly reduced the likelihood of a hospitalization.
Increasing family physician comprehensiveness of care, especially as measured by claims measures, is associated with decreasing Medicare costs and hospitalizations. Payment and practice policies that enhance primary care comprehensiveness may help "bend the cost curve."
全面性被誉为初级保健的五大核心优点之一,但其与治疗结果之间的关系尚不清楚。我们衡量了家庭医生诊疗全面性的差异与医保受益人的医疗服务利用情况及费用之间的关联。
我们将2011年医疗保险A部分和B部分理赔档案中的数据(针对从事直接患者护理的家庭医生的复杂随机样本,包括他们所申报的为医保受益人提供的全部护理)与这些医生在2007年至2011年参与家庭医生认证维持计划(MC-FP)期间报告的数据进行合并。我们从作为MC-FP考试注册一部分的强制性自我报告调查项目中创建了一个全面性衡量指标。我们将该指标与另一个从医疗保险的贝伦森-埃格斯服务类型(BETOS)代码得出的指标进行比较。然后,我们研究了这两个全面性衡量指标与住院治疗、B部分费用以及A部分和B部分费用总和之间的关联。
我们完整的家庭医生样本包括3652名医生,他们为555165名医保受益人提供了大部分护理。其中,1133名医生在2007年至2011年期间重新获得认证,并照顾了185044名受益人。BETOS指标与自我报告的全面性指标之间存在适度相关性(0.30)。在对受益人和医生特征进行调整后,全面性的提高与医疗保险A部分和B部分的总费用降低以及单独的B部分费用降低相关,但与住院治疗无关;BETOS指标与支出的关联比自我报告指标更强;更高的BETOS分数显著降低了住院的可能性。
家庭医生护理全面性的提高,尤其是通过理赔指标衡量的,与医疗保险费用和住院治疗的减少相关。提高初级保健全面性的支付和执业政策可能有助于“控制成本曲线”。