McKinnon Britt, Harper Sam, Kaufman Jay S
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Institute for Health and Social Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jun;135:117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 2.
Coverage of skilled delivery care has been increasing across most low-income countries; however, it remains far from universal and is very unequally distributed according to socioeconomic position. In an effort to increase coverage of skilled delivery care and reduce socioeconomic inequalities, governments of several countries in sub-Saharan Africa have recently adopted policies that remove user fees for facility-based delivery services. There is little rigorous evidence of the impact of these policies and few studies have examined effects on socioeconomic inequalities. This study investigates the impact of recent delivery fee exemption policies in Ghana, Senegal, and Sierra Leone on socioeconomic differences in the use of facility-based delivery services. Using Demographic and Health Survey data from nine sub-Saharan African countries, we evaluated the user fee policy changes using a difference-in-differences approach that accounts for underlying common secular trends and time invariant differences among countries, and allows for differential effects of the policy by socioeconomic position. Removing user fees was consistent with meaningful increases in facility deliveries across all categories of household wealth and maternal education. We found little evidence of differential effects of removing user fees across quartiles of household wealth, with increases of 5.4 facility deliveries per hundred live births (95% CI: 2.1, 8.8) among women in the poorest quartile and 6.8 per hundred live births (95% CI: 4.0, 9.7) for women in the richest quartile. However, our results suggest that educated women benefited more from removing user fees compared to women with no education. For women with at least some secondary education, the estimated effect was 8.6 facility deliveries per hundred live births (95% CI: 5.4, 11.9), but only 4.6 per hundred live births (95% CI: 2.2, 7.0) for women with no education (heterogeneity p-value = 0.04). Thus, while removing fees at the point of service increased facility deliveries across the socioeconomic gradient, it did not reduce inequalities defined by household wealth and may have contributed to a widening of educational inequalities. These findings emphasize the need for concerted efforts to address financial and other barriers that contribute to large and persistent socioeconomic inequalities in delivery care.
在大多数低收入国家,熟练接生护理的覆盖范围一直在扩大;然而,其覆盖范围仍远未普及,且根据社会经济地位分布极不均衡。为了扩大熟练接生护理的覆盖范围并减少社会经济不平等现象,撒哈拉以南非洲的几个国家的政府最近出台了政策,取消了基于设施的分娩服务的用户费用。关于这些政策影响的严格证据很少,很少有研究考察其对社会经济不平等的影响。本研究调查了加纳、塞内加尔和塞拉利昂最近的分娩费用豁免政策对基于设施的分娩服务使用方面社会经济差异的影响。利用来自撒哈拉以南非洲九个国家的人口与健康调查数据,我们采用了一种差分法来评估用户费用政策的变化,该方法考虑了潜在的共同长期趋势和国家间的时间不变差异,并允许政策对社会经济地位产生不同影响。取消用户费用与所有家庭财富类别和孕产妇教育水平的设施分娩数量显著增加是一致的。我们几乎没有发现取消用户费用对家庭财富四分位数产生不同影响的证据,最贫困四分位数的妇女每百名活产的设施分娩增加了5.4次(95%置信区间:2.1,8.8),最富有四分位数的妇女每百名活产增加了6.8次(95%置信区间:4.0,9.7)。然而,我们的结果表明,与未受过教育的妇女相比,受过教育的妇女从取消用户费用中受益更多。对于至少受过一些中等教育的妇女,估计影响是每百名活产的设施分娩8.6次(95%置信区间:5.4,11.9),但未受过教育的妇女每百名活产仅为4.6次(95%置信区间:2.2,7.0)(异质性p值 = 0.04)。因此,虽然在服务点取消费用增加了社会经济梯度上的设施分娩数量,但它并没有减少由家庭财富定义的不平等现象,并且可能导致了教育不平等的扩大。这些发现强调了需要共同努力解决导致分娩护理中巨大且持续的社会经济不平等的财务和其他障碍。