• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布基纳法索母婴保健用户费用豁免政策的经济评价:来自成本效益分析的证据。

Economic Evaluation of User-Fee Exemption Policies for Maternal Healthcare in Burkina Faso: Evidence From a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

机构信息

Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Value Health. 2020 Mar;23(3):300-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.007. Epub 2020 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.007
PMID:32197725
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The reduction and removal of user fees for essential care services have recently become a key instrument to advance universal health coverage in sub-Saharan Africa, but no evidence exists on its cost-effectiveness. We aimed to address this gap by estimating the cost-effectiveness of 2 user-fee exemption interventions in Burkina Faso between 2007 and 2015: the national 80% user-fee reduction policy for delivery care services and the user-fee removal pilot (ie, the complete [100%] user-fee removal for delivery care) in the Sahel region.

METHODS

We built a single decision tree to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the 2 study interventions and the baseline. The decision tree was populated with an own impact evaluation and the best available epidemiological evidence.

RESULTS

Relative to the baseline, both the national 80% user-fee reduction policy and the user-fee removal pilot are highly cost-effective, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $210.22 and $252.51 per disability-adjusted life-year averted, respectively. Relative to the national 80% user-fee reduction policy, the user-fee removal pilot entails an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $309.74 per disability-adjusted life-year averted.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that it is worthwhile for Burkina Faso to move from an 80% reduction to the complete removal of user fees for delivery care. Local analyses should be done to identify whether it is worthwhile to implement user-fee exemptions in other sub-Saharan African countries.

摘要

目的

降低和免除基本医疗服务的用户费用最近已成为在撒哈拉以南非洲推进全民健康覆盖的关键手段,但尚未有其成本效益的证据。我们旨在通过估计布基纳法索 2007 年至 2015 年期间 2 项用户费用豁免干预措施的成本效益来填补这一空白:全国 80%的分娩护理服务用户费用减免政策和萨赫勒地区的用户费用免除试点(即完全免除分娩护理的用户费用)。

方法

我们构建了一个单一的决策树来评估这两项研究干预措施和基线的成本效益。决策树中纳入了自身影响评估和最佳的现有流行病学证据。

结果

与基线相比,全国 80%的用户费用减免政策和用户费用免除试点都具有很高的成本效益,避免每个残疾调整生命年的增量成本效益比分别为 210.22 美元和 252.51 美元。与全国 80%的用户费用减免政策相比,用户费用免除试点的增量成本效益比为避免每个残疾调整生命年的 309.74 美元。

结论

我们的研究表明,布基纳法索从 80%的减免转向完全免除分娩护理的用户费用是值得的。应进行本地分析,以确定在其他撒哈拉以南非洲国家实施用户费用豁免是否值得。

相似文献

1
Economic Evaluation of User-Fee Exemption Policies for Maternal Healthcare in Burkina Faso: Evidence From a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.布基纳法索母婴保健用户费用豁免政策的经济评价:来自成本效益分析的证据。
Value Health. 2020 Mar;23(3):300-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.007. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
2
Financial accessibility and user fee reforms for maternal healthcare in five sub-Saharan countries: a quasi-experimental analysis.撒哈拉以南五个国家孕产妇保健的财务可及性与使用者付费改革:一项准实验分析
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 28;6(1):e009692. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009692.
3
The impact of reducing and eliminating user fees on facility-based delivery: a controlled interrupted time series in Burkina Faso.降低和取消用户费用对医疗机构分娩的影响:布基纳法索的一项对照中断时间序列研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Oct 1;33(8):948-956. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy077.
4
User fee exemptions and excessive household spending for normal delivery in Burkina Faso: the need for careful implementation.用户付费豁免和布基纳法索正常分娩的过度家庭支出:需要谨慎实施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 21;12:412. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-412.
5
Cost and impact of policies to remove and reduce fees for obstetric care in Benin, Burkina Faso, Mali and Morocco.贝宁、布基纳法索、马里和摩洛哥取消和降低产科护理费用政策的成本与影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Aug 2;15(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0412-y.
6
The impact of user fee removal policies on household out-of-pocket spending: evidence against the inverse equity hypothesis from a population based study in Burkina Faso.取消用户付费政策对家庭自付支出的影响:来自布基纳法索一项基于人群的研究对反向公平假设的反驳证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Jan;16(1):55-64. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0553-5. Epub 2014 Jan 12.
7
Who benefits from removing user fees for facility-based delivery services? Evidence on socioeconomic differences from Ghana, Senegal and Sierra Leone.谁能从取消住院分娩服务的用户费用中受益?来自加纳、塞内加尔和塞拉利昂的社会经济差异证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jun;135:117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 May 2.
8
Free versus subsidised healthcare: options for fee exemptions, access to care for vulnerable groups and effects on the health system in Burkina Faso.免费医疗与补贴医疗:布基纳法索的费用豁免选项、弱势群体的医疗服务获取情况及其对卫生系统的影响
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Jul 12;15(Suppl 1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0210-z.
9
Understanding home delivery in a context of user fee reduction: a cross-sectional mixed methods study in rural Burkina Faso.在降低用户费用背景下理解家庭分娩情况:布基纳法索农村地区的一项横断面混合方法研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Dec 11;15:330. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0764-0.
10
Removing user fees for facility-based delivery services: a difference-in-differences evaluation from ten sub-Saharan African countries.取消基于设施的分娩服务的用户费用:来自撒哈拉以南非洲十个国家的双重差分评估。
Health Policy Plan. 2015 May;30(4):432-41. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu027. Epub 2014 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Using a policy learning lens to understand health financing policy outcomes: the case of translating strategic health purchasing into policy and practice in Burkina Faso.利用政策学习视角理解卫生筹资政策结果:以布基纳法索将战略性卫生采购转化为政策和实践为例。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Nov 13;9(11):e015488. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015488.
2
User Fee Exemption Policy Significantly Improved Adherence to Maternal Health Service Utilization in Bahir Dar City, Northwest Ethiopia: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.用户费用豁免政策显著提高了埃塞俄比亚西北部巴赫达尔市孕产妇保健服务的利用率:一项比较横断面研究。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Dec 11;15:775-785. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S431488. eCollection 2023.
3
Do Out-of-Pocket Payments for Care for Children under 5 Persist Even in a Context of Free Healthcare in Burkina Faso? Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Population-Based Survey.
即使在布基纳法索实行免费医疗的情况下,5岁以下儿童的医疗自付费用是否仍然存在?基于人群的横断面调查证据。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 10;11(10):1379. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101379.
4
Innovations in mutuality: challenges and learnings for the Universal Health Insurance Plan in Mali.创新性的互惠关系:马里全民健康保险计划的挑战与经验教训。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Mar;7(Suppl 9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011055.
5
Vulnerabilities and Strengths of Pregnant Haitian Adolescents and their Families During Transition to Motherhood.海地怀孕青少年及其家庭在向母亲角色转变过程中的脆弱性与优势
Int J MCH AIDS. 2022;11(2):e564. doi: 10.21106/ijma.564. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
6
Factors influencing maternal healthcare seeking in a highland region of Madagascar: a mixed methods analysis.影响马达加斯加高地地区孕产妇寻求医疗保健的因素:混合方法分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jun 16;21(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03930-2.
7
A review of prospective pathways and impacts of COVID-19 on the accessibility, safety, quality, and affordability of essential medicines and vaccines for universal health coverage in Africa.关于2019年冠状病毒病对非洲全民健康覆盖所需基本药物和疫苗的可及性、安全性、质量及可负担性的潜在途径和影响的综述。
Global Health. 2021 Apr 8;17(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00666-8.