School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Health Promotion Alliance Cameroon (HPAC), Yaounde, Cameroon.
J Glob Health. 2023 May 5;13:04035. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04035.
Performance-based financing (PBF) assumes that subsidizing user fees for maternal health services to reduce out-of-pocket expenses will expand coverage and reduce inequities in access to maternal health services. It is usually associated with process changes, and the idea that increasing a facility's resources from PBF interventions can improve the availability of equipment, drugs, and medical supplies at the facility, has an indirect effect on out-of-pocket expenses. Assessment of complex interventions such as PBF requires consideration of specific underlying assumption or theories of change. Such assessment will allow a better and broader understanding of the system's strengths and weaknesses, where the gaps lie, whether the theory of change is sound, and will inform policy design and implementation.
Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) checklist, we performed a systematic review and a critical appraisal of selected studies using the risk-of-bias criteria developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care. We used the Grading of Recommendation and Evaluation, Development and Assessment framework for assessing the overall strength of the evidence.
After the abstract screening (n = 9873), we deemed 302 as relevant for full-text screening and assessed 85 studies for review eligibility. Finally, we included 17 studies in the review. We could not conduct a meta-analysis, so we report a narrative synthesis. As an add-on to an existing payment mechanism, PBF may facilitate the removal of operational barriers to enhance utilization of certain maternal health services in some contexts, especially in public facilities.
PBF strategies may potentially decrease out-of-pocket expenses for specific maternal health services, especially in settings that have already instituted some form of user fee exemption policies on maternal health services. The implementation of PBF can be considered a potential access instrument in reducing out-of-pocket expenses to stimulate demand for maternal services. However, the implementation approaches employed will determine utilization, taking into consideration existing equitable and inequitable access characteristics which vary by context.
PROSPERO CRD42020222893.
绩效激励型融资(PBF)假设补贴产妇保健服务的用户费用以减少自费支出,将扩大服务覆盖范围并减少获得产妇保健服务方面的不平等。它通常与流程变化相关联,并且认为从 PBF 干预中增加医疗机构的资源可以改善设备、药品和医疗用品在医疗机构中的供应,这对自费支出有间接影响。对 PBF 等复杂干预措施的评估需要考虑特定的基本假设或变革理论。这种评估将使人们更好地全面了解系统的优势和劣势、差距所在、变革理论是否合理,并为政策设计和实施提供信息。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA 2020)检查表,我们使用 Cochrane 有效实践和护理组织制定的偏倚风险标准对选定的研究进行了系统评价和批判性评估。我们使用推荐评估、发展和评估框架(GRADE)来评估证据的整体强度。
在摘要筛选(n=9873)后,我们认为 302 篇文章与全文筛选相关,并评估了 85 篇研究的审查资格。最后,我们纳入了 17 项研究进行综述。我们无法进行荟萃分析,因此我们报告了叙述性综合。作为现有支付机制的附加措施,PBF 可能有助于消除运营障碍,在某些情况下促进某些产妇保健服务的利用,尤其是在公共设施中。
PBF 策略可能潜在地降低特定产妇保健服务的自费支出,尤其是在已经对产妇保健服务实施某种形式的用户费用豁免政策的环境中。实施 PBF 可以被视为一种潜在的促进产妇服务需求的获取手段。然而,所采用的实施方法将决定利用率,同时考虑到现有公平和不公平获取特征,这些特征因背景而异。
PROSPERO CRD42020222893。