Wyland Timothy P, Van Dorin Joshua D, Reyes G Francis Cisco
1Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Concordia University, Portland, Oregon; and 2School of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Human Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois.
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Nov;29(11):3115-23. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000991.
Applying accommodating resistance combined with isoinertial resistance has been demonstrated to be effective in improving neuromuscular attributes important for sport performance. The main purpose of this study was to determine whether short sprints can be acutely enhanced after several sets of back squats with or without accommodating resistance. Twenty recreationally resistance-trained males (age: 23.3 ± 4.4 years; height: 178.9 ± 6.5 cm; weight: 88.3 ± 10.8 kg) performed pre-post testing on 9.1-m sprint time. Three different interventions were implemented in randomized order between pre-post 9.1-m sprints. On 3 separate days, subjects either sat for 5 minutes (CTRL), performed 5 sets of 3 repetitions at 85% of their 1 repetition maximum (1RM) with isoinertial load (STND), or performed 5 sets of 3 repetitions at 85% of their 1RM, with 30% of the total resistance coming from elastic band tension (BAND) between pre-post 9.1-m sprint testing. Posttesting for 9.1-m sprint time occurred immediately after the last set of squats (Post-Immediate) and on every minute for 4 minutes after the last set of squats (Post-1min, Post-2min, Post-3min, and Post-4min). Repeated-measures analysis of variance statistical analyses revealed no significant changes in sprint time across posttesting times during the CTRL and STND condition. During the BAND condition, sprint time significantly decreased from Post-Immediate to Post-4min (p = 0.002). The uniqueness of accommodating resistance could create an optimal postactivation potentiation effect to increase neuromuscular performance. Coaches and athletes can implement heavy accommodating resistance exercises to their warm-up when improving acute sprint time is desired.
已证明应用顺应性阻力与等惯性阻力相结合可有效改善对运动表现至关重要的神经肌肉属性。本研究的主要目的是确定在进行几组有或无顺应性阻力的后深蹲后,短距离冲刺成绩能否得到急性提高。20名接受过休闲抗阻训练的男性(年龄:23.3±4.4岁;身高:178.9±6.5厘米;体重:88.3±10.8千克)进行了9.1米冲刺时间的前后测试。在9.1米冲刺前后测试之间,以随机顺序实施了三种不同的干预措施。在3个不同的日子里,受试者要么静坐5分钟(对照组),要么以其1次重复最大值(1RM)的85%进行5组,每组3次重复的等惯性负荷训练(标准组),要么以其1RM的85%进行5组,每组3次重复训练,其中30%的总阻力来自弹力带张力(弹力带组)。9.1米冲刺时间的后测试在最后一组深蹲后立即进行(即时后测),并在最后一组深蹲后的每一分钟进行,共持续4分钟(1分钟后测、2分钟后测、3分钟后测和4分钟后测)。重复测量方差分析统计分析显示,在对照组和标准组条件下,整个后测试期间冲刺时间没有显著变化。在弹力带组条件下,冲刺时间从即时后测到4分钟后测显著下降(p = 0.002)。顺应性阻力的独特性可能会产生最佳的后激活增强效应,以提高神经肌肉性能。当希望提高急性冲刺时间时,教练和运动员可以在热身时进行重度顺应性阻力训练。