Suppr超能文献

围手术期化疗对晚期原发性尿道癌患者生存的影响:原发性尿道癌国际协作研究的结果。

Impact of perioperative chemotherapy on survival in patients with advanced primary urethral cancer: results of the international collaboration on primary urethral carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany

Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1754-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv230. Epub 2015 May 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the impact of perioperative chemo(radio)therapy in advanced primary urethral carcinoma (PUC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 124 patients (86 men, 38 women) were diagnosed with and underwent surgery for PUC in 10 referral centers between 1993 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank testing was used to investigate the impact of perioperative chemo(radio)therapy on overall survival (OS). The median follow-up was 21 months (mean: 32 months; interquartile range: 5-48).

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (N-CRT) plus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACH), and ACH was delivered in 12 (31%), 6 (15%) and 21 (54%) of these patients, respectively. Receipt of NAC/N-CRT was associated with clinically node-positive disease (cN+; P = 0.033) and lower utilization of cystectomy at surgery (P = 0.015). The objective response rate to NAC and N-CRT was 25% and 33%, respectively. The 3-year OS for patients with objective response to neoadjuvant treatment (complete/partial response) was 100% and 58.3% for those with stable or progressive disease (P = 0.30). Of the 26 patients staged ≥cT3 and/or cN+ disease, 16 (62%) received perioperative chemo(radio)therapy and 10 upfront surgery without perioperative chemotherapy (38%). The 3-year OS for this locally advanced subset of patients (≥cT3 and/or cN+) who received NAC (N = 5), N-CRT (N = 3), surgery-only (N = 10) and surgery plus ACH (N = 8) was 100%, 100%, 50% and 20%, respectively (P = 0.016). Among these 26 patients, receipt of neoadjuvant treatment was significantly associated with improved 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.022) and OS (P = 0.022). Proximal tumor location correlated with inferior 3-year RFS and OS (P = 0.056/0.005).

CONCLUSION

In this series, patients who received NAC/N-CRT for cT3 and/or cN+ PUC appeared to demonstrate improved survival compared with those who underwent upfront surgery with or without ACH.

摘要

背景

研究围手术期化疗(放)疗对晚期原发性尿道癌(PUC)的影响。

患者和方法

1993 年至 2012 年间,在 10 个转诊中心对 124 名(86 名男性,38 名女性)被诊断为 PUC 并接受手术的患者进行了一系列研究。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析和对数秩检验来研究围手术期化疗(放)疗对总生存(OS)的影响。中位随访时间为 21 个月(平均:32 个月;四分位距:5-48)。

结果

12 名患者(31%)接受了新辅助化疗(NAC)、新辅助放化疗(N-CRT)加辅助化疗(ACH)和 ACH,6 名患者(15%)和 21 名患者(54%)分别接受了 NAC/N-CRT。接受 NAC/N-CRT 与临床淋巴结阳性疾病(cN+;P = 0.033)和手术中更少使用膀胱切除术(P = 0.015)相关。NAC 和 N-CRT 的客观缓解率分别为 25%和 33%。新辅助治疗有客观反应(完全/部分缓解)的患者 3 年 OS 为 100%,无反应(稳定或进展)的患者为 58.3%(P = 0.30)。26 名 cT3 期和/或 cN+疾病分期≥的患者中,16 名(62%)接受了围手术期化疗(放)疗,10 名(38%)未接受围手术期化疗而直接手术。局部晚期(≥cT3 和/或 cN+)患者(N = 5)接受 NAC、N-CRT(N = 3)、单纯手术(N = 10)和手术加 ACH(N = 8)的 3 年 OS 分别为 100%、100%、50%和 20%(P = 0.016)。在这 26 名患者中,接受新辅助治疗与 3 年无复发生存率(RFS)(P = 0.022)和 OS(P = 0.022)的改善显著相关。肿瘤近端位置与 3 年 RFS 和 OS 较差相关(P = 0.056/0.005)。

结论

在本系列中,接受 cT3 和/或 cN+ PUC 新辅助 NAC/N-CRT 的患者的生存似乎优于接受直接手术加或不加 ACH 的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验