世界卫生组织（WHO）与纳朗霍（Naranjo）不良事件因果关系评估工具的一致性及合理应用比较 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Comparison of agreement and rational uses of the WHO and Naranjo adverse event causality assessment tools.

作者信息

Mittal Niti, Gupta Mahesh C

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

出版信息

J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2015 Apr-Jun;6(2):91-3. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.155486.

DOI:10.4103/0976-500X.155486

PMID:25969656

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4419255/

Abstract

摘要

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e192/4419255/468610f808c4/JPP-6-91-g001.jpg

相似文献

Comparison of agreement and rational uses of the WHO and Naranjo adverse event causality assessment tools.世界卫生组织（WHO）与纳朗霍（Naranjo）不良事件因果关系评估工具的一致性及合理应用比较

J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2015 Apr-Jun;6(2):91-3. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.155486.

Evaluation of naranjo adverse drug reactions probability scale in causality assessment of drug-induced liver injury.用于药物性肝损伤因果关系评估的Naranjo药物不良反应概率量表评价

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 May;27(9):780-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03655.x. Epub 2008 Feb 18.

Consistency between causality assessments obtained with two scales and their agreement with clinical judgments in hepatotoxicity.两种量表评估因果关系的一致性及其与肝毒性临床判断的一致性。

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Mar;20(3):272-85. doi: 10.1002/pds.2081. Epub 2011 Jan 10.

Spontaneous reports of assumed herbal hepatotoxicity by black cohosh: is the liver-unspecific Naranjo scale precise enough to ascertain causality?黑升麻导致肝损伤的自发报告：肝脏非特异性 Naranjo 量表是否足够精确以确定因果关系？

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Jun;20(6):567-82. doi: 10.1002/pds.2127.

MOdified NARanjo Causality Scale for ICSRs (MONARCSi): A Decision Support Tool for Safety Scientists.改良的 ICSR 中的 Naranjo 因果关系量表（MONARCSi）：安全科学家的决策支持工具。

Drug Saf. 2018 Nov;41(11):1073-1085. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0690-y.

Interrater agreement of two adverse drug reaction causality assessment methods: A randomised comparison of the Liverpool Adverse Drug Reaction Causality Assessment Tool and the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre system.两种药物不良反应因果关系评估方法的评分者间一致性：利物浦药物不良反应因果关系评估工具与世界卫生组织-乌普萨拉监测中心系统的随机比较

PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172830. eCollection 2017.

Adverse drug reaction causality assessment tools for drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: room for improvement.药物性 Stevens-Johnson 综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的药物不良反应因果关系评估工具：仍有改进空间。

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Aug;75(8):1135-1141. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02670-9. Epub 2019 Mar 27.

Evaluation of the reproducibility of the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale score in published case reports.已发表病例报告中Naranjo药物不良反应概率量表评分的可重复性评估。

Pharmacotherapy. 2014 Nov;34(11):1159-66. doi: 10.1002/phar.1496. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

Can causality assessment fulfill the new European definition of adverse drug reaction? A review of methods used in spontaneous reporting.因果关系评估能否满足新的欧洲药物不良反应定义？自发报告中使用方法的综述。

Pharmacol Res. 2017 Sep;123:122-129. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 8.

Naranjo Question Answering using End-to-End Multi-task Learning Model.使用端到端多任务学习模型的纳朗霍问答系统。

KDD. 2019 Aug;2019:2547-2555. doi: 10.1145/3292500.3330770.

引用本文的文献

Agreement and correlation between WHO-UMC Causality scale and the Naranjo algorithm for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions at tertiary care center in Northern India.印度北部三级医疗中心中，世界卫生组织药物不良反应因果关系评估量表（WHO-UMC）与纳朗霍算法在药物不良反应因果关系评估方面的一致性和相关性。

J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Apr;14(4):1252-1258. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1148_24. Epub 2025 Apr 25.

Heparin-Induced Hyperkalemia Assessment Utilizing the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale: A 40-Year Systematic Review.利用纳伦霍药物不良反应概率量表评估肝素诱导的高钾血症：一项40年的系统评价

Pharmacy (Basel). 2025 Apr 11;13(2):55. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy13020055.

Scoping Review of Studies Evaluating Frailty and Its Association with Medication Harm.评价衰弱及其与药物伤害相关性的研究的范围综述。

Drugs Aging. 2022 May;39(5):333-353. doi: 10.1007/s40266-022-00940-3. Epub 2022 May 22.

Agreement between WHO-UMC causality scale and the Naranjo algorithm for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions.世界卫生组织药物不良反应因果关系评估量表与纳伦霍算法在药物不良反应因果关系评估方面的一致性。

J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Sep;10(9):3303-3308. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_831_21. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

Validation of a novel causality assessment scale for adverse events in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients treated with platinum and pemetrexed doublet chemotherapy.一种用于接受铂类和培美曲塞双联化疗的非小细胞肺癌患者不良事件的新型因果关系评估量表的验证

Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2021 Feb 11;12:2042098621991280. doi: 10.1177/2042098621991280. eCollection 2021.

Italian Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations for Outpatients' Adverse Drug Events: 12-Year Active Pharmacovigilance Surveillance (The MEREAFaPS Study).意大利急诊科门诊患者药物不良事件的就诊和住院情况：12年主动药物警戒监测（MEREAFaPS研究）

Front Pharmacol. 2020 Apr 6;11:412. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00412. eCollection 2020.

Community-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury Induced By Drugs In Older Patients: A Multifactorial Event.社区获得性急性肾损伤药物相关性：多因素事件。

Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Dec 5;14:2105-2113. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S217567. eCollection 2019.

Prescription pattern & adverse drug reactions of prokinetics.促动力药物的处方模式和药物不良反应。

Indian J Med Res. 2019 Jun;149(6):748-754. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1039_17.

Comparison of different methods for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions.不同药物不良反应因果关系评估方法的比较

Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Aug;40(4):903-910. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0694-9. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

Use and Safety of Anthroposophic Medicinal Products: An Analysis of 44,662 Patients from the EvaMed Pharmacovigilance Network.人智学药品的使用与安全性：对来自EvaMed药物警戒网络的44662名患者的分析

Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2017 Dec;4(4):199-213. doi: 10.1007/s40801-017-0118-5.

本文引用的文献

Limitations and obstacles of the spontaneous adverse drugs reactions reporting: Two "challenging" case reports.自发药物不良反应报告的局限性与障碍：两例“具有挑战性的”病例报告

J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013 Dec;4(Suppl 1):S66-72. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.120955.

Comparison of three methods (consensual expert judgement, algorithmic and probabilistic approaches) of causality assessment of adverse drug reactions: an assessment using reports made to a French pharmacovigilance centre.三种药物不良反应因果关系评估方法（一致性专家判断、算法和概率方法）的比较：用法语药物警戒中心报告进行的评估。

Drug Saf. 2010 Nov 1;33(11):1045-54. doi: 10.2165/11537780-000000000-00000.

Methods for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review.药物不良反应因果关系评估方法：一项系统综述

Drug Saf. 2008;31(1):21-37. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831010-00003.

A new algorithm to identify the causality of adverse drug reactions.一种识别药物不良反应因果关系的新算法。

Drug Saf. 2005;28(12):1159-61. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528120-00010.

Causality assessment of adverse drug reactions: comparison of the results obtained from published decisional algorithms and from the evaluations of an expert panel.药物不良反应的因果关系评估：已发表决策算法得出的结果与专家小组评估结果的比较

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Dec;14(12):885-90. doi: 10.1002/pds.1138.

Causality assessment of adverse drug reactions: comparison of the results obtained from published decisional algorithms and from the evaluations of an expert panel, according to different levels of imputability.药物不良反应的因果关系评估：根据不同程度的可归因性，比较从已发表的决策算法和专家小组评估中获得的结果。

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2003 Apr;28(2):137-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2003.00475.x.

Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management.药物不良反应：定义、诊断与处理

Lancet. 2000 Oct 7;356(9237):1255-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9.

Comparison of the Bayesian approach and a simple algorithm for assessment of adverse drug events.贝叶斯方法与一种评估药物不良事件的简单算法的比较。

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Dec;58(6):692-8. doi: 10.1016/0009-9236(95)90026-8.

A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions.一种估算药物不良反应概率的方法。

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981 Aug;30(2):239-45. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.154.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验