Suppr超能文献

黑升麻导致肝损伤的自发报告:肝脏非特异性 Naranjo 量表是否足够精确以确定因果关系?

Spontaneous reports of assumed herbal hepatotoxicity by black cohosh: is the liver-unspecific Naranjo scale precise enough to ascertain causality?

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Klinikum Hanau, Teaching Hospital of the Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Hanau, Germany.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Jun;20(6):567-82. doi: 10.1002/pds.2127.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Causality assessment of cases with herbal hepatotoxicity represents a major regulatory challenge and included, in the past, the application of a diagnostic algorithm consisting of causality evaluation methods with either liver-specific or liver-unspecific characteristics. To evaluate various causality assessing methods in cases with suspected herbal hepatotoxicity, two different scales were now used for reasons of comparison.

METHODS

We used the liver-specific scale of the updated Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) as well as the Naranjo scale that is not organ specific and therefore not liver specific. Both scales were applied to 22 cases of spontaneous reports with initially assumed herbal hepatotoxicity caused by black cohosh, used for menopausal symptoms.

RESULTS

The analysis shows that causality was either unlikely (n = 6) or excluded (n = 16), using the updated CIOMS scale. There were various confounding variables: pre-existing liver diseases (n = 6) including genuine autoimmune hepatitis or alcoholic or cardiac hepatopathy; hepatotoxicity induced by interferon or fluoxetine (n = 2); marginally increased serum activities of alanine aminotransferase (n = 2) or gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (n = 2) of unassessable causality; a mixed group consisting of unassessable cases (n = 6) and cases with questionable, poorly documented hepato-biliary diseases (n = 3); and rosuvastin-induced rhabdomyolysis (n = 1). These confounding factors were not recognized by the Naranjo scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Structured hepatotoxicity-specific causality assessment methods such as the updated CIOMS scale are the preferred tools for causality assessment of assumed herbal hepatotoxicity and should replace the liver-unspecific Naranjo scale. Applying the updated CIOMS scale to cases with initially assumed hepatotoxicity by BC, causality was now found either unlikely or excluded.

摘要

目的

草药性肝毒性病例的因果关系评估是一个主要的监管挑战,过去包括应用一种诊断算法,该算法由具有肝脏特异性或非肝脏特异性特征的因果关系评估方法组成。为了评估疑似草药性肝毒性病例中各种因果关系评估方法,现在出于比较的原因使用了两种不同的量表。

方法

我们使用了更新的国际医学组织理事会(CIOMS)的肝脏特异性量表以及非特定于肝脏的 Naranjo 量表,后者因此不是肝脏特异性的。这两种量表都应用于 22 例最初假定由黑升麻引起的、用于治疗更年期症状的草药性肝毒性自发报告。

结果

使用更新的 CIOMS 量表进行分析表明,因果关系要么不太可能(n=6),要么被排除(n=16)。存在各种混杂因素:存在先前存在的肝脏疾病(n=6),包括真正的自身免疫性肝炎或酒精性或心脏性肝病;干扰素或氟西汀引起的肝毒性(n=2);血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶(n=2)或γ-谷氨酰转肽酶(n=2)的边缘性升高,因果关系无法评估;一个由无法评估的病例(n=6)和具有可疑、记录不良的肝胆疾病的病例(n=3)组成的混合组;以及瑞舒伐他汀引起的横纹肌溶解症(n=1)。这些混杂因素未被 Naranjo 量表识别。

结论

结构化的肝脏特异性因果关系评估方法,如更新的 CIOMS 量表,是评估假定的草药性肝毒性的首选工具,应取代非肝脏特异性的 Naranjo 量表。将更新的 CIOMS 量表应用于最初假定由 BC 引起的肝毒性病例,现在发现因果关系要么不太可能,要么被排除。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验