• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗伦理顾问伦理准则:当下的历程与该领域的启示。

A code of ethics for health care ethics consultants: journey to the present and implications for the field.

机构信息

a University of Maryland School of Nursing and Francis King Carey School of Law.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(5):38-51. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1021966.

DOI:10.1080/15265161.2015.1021966
PMID:25970392
Abstract

For decades a debate has played out in the literature about who bioethicists are, what they do, whether they can be considered professionals qua bioethicists, and, if so, what professional responsibilities they are called to uphold. Health care ethics consultants are bioethicists who work in health care settings. They have been seeking guidance documents that speak to their special relationships/duties toward those they serve. By approving a Code of Ethics and Professional Responsibilities for Health Care Ethics Consultants, the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH) has moved the professionalization debate forward in a significant way. This first code of ethics focuses on individuals who provide health care ethics consultation (HCEC) in clinical settings. The evolution of the code's development, implications for the field of HCEC and bioethics, and considerations for future directions are presented here.

摘要

几十年来,文献中一直在争论生物伦理学家是谁、他们做什么、他们能否被视为专业的生物伦理学家,如果可以,他们被要求承担哪些专业责任。医疗保健伦理顾问是在医疗保健环境中工作的生物伦理学家。他们一直在寻求针对他们所服务的人的特殊关系/职责的指导文件。美国生物伦理学和人文学会 (ASBH) 批准了《医疗保健伦理顾问道德规范和专业责任守则》,这在很大程度上推动了专业化辩论的发展。这第一个道德规范侧重于在临床环境中提供医疗保健伦理咨询 (HCEC) 的个人。本文介绍了该规范的发展演变、对 HCEC 和生物伦理学领域的影响,以及对未来方向的考虑。

相似文献

1
A code of ethics for health care ethics consultants: journey to the present and implications for the field.医疗伦理顾问伦理准则:当下的历程与该领域的启示。
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(5):38-51. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1021966.
2
The "Ethics" Expertise in Clinical Ethics Consultation.临床伦理咨询中的“伦理”专业知识。
J Med Philos. 2016 Aug;41(4):363-8. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhw013. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
3
The Significance of the ASBH's Code of Ethics for Healthcare Ethics Consultants.美国生物伦理与人文学会(ASBH)的伦理准则对医疗伦理顾问的意义。
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(5):52-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1023907.
4
Health care ethics consultation: an update on core competencies and emerging standards from the American Society For Bioethics and Humanities' core competencies update task force.医疗保健伦理学咨询:美国生物伦理学和人文科学协会核心能力更新工作组关于核心能力和新兴标准的最新更新。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(2):3-13. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.750388.
5
Structuring a written examination to assess ASBH health care ethics consultation core knowledge competencies.编写书面考试以评估 ASBH 医疗保健伦理咨询核心知识能力。
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(1):5-17. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.861035.
6
Professionalization of clinical ethics consultation: defining (down) the code.临床伦理咨询的专业化:对准则进行(向下)界定。
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(5):54-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1026235.
7
Fostering the ethics of ethics consultants in health care: an ongoing participatory approach.培养医疗保健领域伦理顾问的职业道德:一种持续的参与式方法。
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(5):60-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1021979.
8
A code of ethics for ethicists: what would Pierre Bourdieu say? "Do not misuse social capital in the age of consortia ethics".伦理学家的道德准则:皮埃尔·布迪厄会怎么说?“在财团伦理时代,勿滥用社会资本”。
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(5):64-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1021976.
9
Health care ethics consultation: nature, goals, and competencies. A position paper from the Society for Health and Human Values-Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation.医疗保健伦理咨询:性质、目标与能力。健康与人类价值协会 - 生物伦理咨询协会生物伦理咨询标准特别工作组的立场文件。
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Jul 4;133(1):59-69. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-1-200007040-00012.
10
A critique of the (aspirational) code of ethics.对(理想的)道德准则的批判。
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(5):62-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1021975.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical ethics consultation services: public-facing information on NCI-designated cancer center websites.临床伦理咨询服务:NCI 指定癌症中心网站上面向公众的信息。
Oncologist. 2024 Oct 3;29(10):904-907. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae173.
2
Ethics support for ethics support: the development of the Confidentiality Compass for dealing with moral challenges concerning (breaching) confidentiality in moral case deliberation.为伦理支持提供伦理支持:制定保密指南以应对道德案例审议中有关(违反)保密的道德挑战。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 3;25(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01039-7.
3
The need for clinical ethics consultation: a monocentric observational survey study in the intensive care unit (Consul.E.T.I. study).
临床伦理咨询的必要性:重症监护病房的单中心观察性调查研究(Consul.E.T.I. 研究)
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2022 Sep 14;2(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s44158-022-00069-0.
4
Conceptualizing and Fostering the Quality of CES Through a Dutch National Network on CES (NEON).通过荷兰 CES 国家网络(NEON)构思和培养 CES 质量。
HEC Forum. 2022 Jun;34(2):169-186. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09432-6. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
5
Insiders and Outsiders: Lessons for Neuroethics from the History of Bioethics.局内人与局外人:生物伦理学史上的神经伦理学课程。
AJOB Neurosci. 2020 Jul-Sep;11(3):155-166. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2020.1778118.
6
Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support.从实施临床伦理支持的响应式质量评估中吸取的教训。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Nov 1;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0418-2.
7
Clinical Ethics Consultation in the Transition Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.中东欧转型国家的临床伦理咨询。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Apr;26(2):833-850. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00141-z. Epub 2019 Oct 5.
8
Disenchantment and clinical ethics.祛魅与临床伦理学。
Med Health Care Philos. 2019 Dec;22(4):497-498. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09925-3.
9
The value of bioethical research: A qualitative literature analysis of researchers' statements.生物伦理研究的价值:研究人员观点的定性文献分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 29;14(7):e0220438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220438. eCollection 2019.
10
"If an acute event occurs, what should we do?" Diverse ethical approaches to decision-making in the ICU.“如果发生急性事件,我们该怎么做?”重症监护病房决策中的多种伦理方法。
Med Health Care Philos. 2019 Sep;22(3):475-486. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09887-6.