Suppr超能文献

患者赋权评估——措施的系统评价

Assessment of patient empowerment--a systematic review of measures.

作者信息

Barr Paul J, Scholl Isabelle, Bravo Paulina, Faber Marjan J, Elwyn Glyn, McAllister Marion

机构信息

Dartmouth College, Lebanon, United States of America.

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 May 13;10(5):e0126553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126553. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient empowerment has gained considerable importance but uncertainty remains about the best way to define and measure it. The validity of empirical findings depends on the quality of measures used. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of studies assessing psychometric properties of questionnaires purporting to capture patient empowerment, evaluate the methodological quality of these studies and assess the psychometric properties of measures identified.

METHODS

Electronic searches in five databases were combined with reference tracking of included articles. Peer-reviewed articles reporting psychometric testing of empowerment measures for adult patients in French, German, English, Portuguese and Spanish were included. Study characteristics, constructs operationalised and psychometric properties were extracted. The quality of study design, methods and reporting was assessed using the COSMIN checklist. The quality of psychometric properties was assessed using Terwee's 2007 criteria.

FINDINGS

30 studies on 19 measures were included. Six measures are generic, while 13 were developed for a specific condition (N=4) or specialty (N=9). Most studies tested measures in English (N=17) or Swedish (N=6). Sample sizes of included studies varied from N=35 to N=8261. A range of patient empowerment constructs was operationalised in included measures. These were classified into four domains: patient states, experiences and capacities; patient actions and behaviours; patient self-determination within the healthcare relationship and patient skills development. Quality assessment revealed several flaws in methodological study quality with COSMIN scores mainly fair or poor. The overall quality of psychometric properties of included measures was intermediate to positive. Certain psychometric properties were not tested for most measures.

DISCUSSION

Findings provide a basis from which to develop consensus on a core set of patient empowerment constructs and for further work to develop a (set of) appropriately validated measure(s) to capture this. The methodological quality of psychometric studies could be improved by adhering to published quality criteria.

摘要

背景

患者赋权已变得相当重要,但在定义和衡量它的最佳方式上仍存在不确定性。实证研究结果的有效性取决于所使用测量方法的质量。本系统评价旨在概述评估旨在衡量患者赋权的问卷心理测量特性的研究,评估这些研究的方法学质量,并评估所确定测量方法的心理测量特性。

方法

在五个数据库中进行电子检索,并结合对纳入文章的参考文献追踪。纳入了以法语、德语、英语、葡萄牙语和西班牙语报告成年患者赋权测量方法心理测量测试的同行评审文章。提取了研究特征、所实施的结构和心理测量特性。使用COSMIN清单评估研究设计、方法和报告的质量。使用特韦2007年标准评估心理测量特性的质量。

结果

纳入了关于19种测量方法的30项研究。6种测量方法是通用的,而13种是针对特定疾病(n = 4)或专科(n = 9)开发的。大多数研究用英语(n = 17)或瑞典语(n = 6)测试测量方法。纳入研究的样本量从n = 35到n = 8261不等。纳入的测量方法中实施了一系列患者赋权结构。这些被分为四个领域:患者状态、经历和能力;患者行动和行为;患者在医疗关系中的自决以及患者技能发展。质量评估显示方法学研究质量存在若干缺陷,COSMIN评分主要为中等或较差。纳入测量方法的心理测量特性的总体质量为中等至良好。大多数测量方法未测试某些心理测量特性。

讨论

研究结果为就患者赋权核心结构集达成共识以及开展进一步工作以开发一套经过适当验证的测量方法来衡量这一点提供了基础。遵循已发表的质量标准可提高心理测量研究的方法学质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf02/4430483/c5a011eb44f3/pone.0126553.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验