三种不同计算机化头影测量分析软件的可靠性和准确性

Reliability and accuracy of three different computerized cephalometric analysis software.

作者信息

Rusu Oana, Petcu Ana Elena, Drăgan Eliza, Haba Danisia, Moscalu Mihaela, Zetu Irina Nicoleta

出版信息

Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2015 Jan-Mar;119(1):248-56.

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to determine, compare and evaluate three different computerized tracing programs, where the lateral cephalograms were digitized on the screen. 39 randomly selected cephalometric radiographs were used in the present study. Three programs Planmeca Romexis® (Romexis 3.2.0., Helsinki, Finland), Orthalis (France) and AxCeph (A.C 2.3.0.74, Ljubljana, Slovenia) were evaluated. 12 skeletal, 9 dental and 3 soft tissue parameters were measured that consisted of 11 linear and 13 angular measurements. Statistical analysis was carried out using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), Levene test, Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test and Kruskal-Wallis test. The measurements obtained with the cephalometric analyses programs used in the study were reliable.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定、比较和评估三种不同的计算机追踪程序，这些程序可在屏幕上对头颅侧位片进行数字化处理。本研究使用了39张随机选取的头影测量X线片。对三种程序Planmeca Romexis®（Romexis 3.2.0.，芬兰赫尔辛基）、Orthalis（法国）和AxCeph（A.C 2.3.0.74，斯洛文尼亚卢布尔雅那）进行了评估。测量了12项骨骼、9项牙齿和3项软组织参数，包括11项线性测量和13项角度测量值。使用多变量方差分析（MANOVA）、Levene检验、Tukey真实显著差异（HSD）检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验进行统计分析。本研究中使用的头影测量分析程序所获得的测量结果是可靠的。