Holt Amanda
Department of Social Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016 Dec;17(5):490-499. doi: 10.1177/1524838015584372. Epub 2015 May 13.
Across the Global North, adolescent-to-parent abuse (APA) is becoming recognized as a significant social problem and is receiving attention from researchers, policymakers, and practitioners who work in the intersecting fields of juvenile justice, child protection, and domestic violence. One of the key questions shaping current debates concerns the extent to which APA maps onto the contours of domestic violence, in terms of research and theory, policy, and practice. In particular, to what extent can our established ways of working with domestic violence be applied when working with APA? This article begins by reviewing definitions and prevalence rates of APA. It then considers how the problem fits into the "family conflicts" and "gender-based violence" paradigms that are most frequently used to conceptualize domestic violence. The article then examines how APA represents a similar but distinct phenomenon to adult-instigated domestic violence and identifies how its departures represent particular challenges in working toward its elimination. The article concludes by reviewing intervention programs that work with APA and exploring some of the ways in which they adopt and reject elements of good practice from the domestic violence practice field.
在全球北方地区,青少年对父母的虐待(APA)正日益被视为一个重大的社会问题,并受到在青少年司法、儿童保护和家庭暴力等交叉领域工作的研究人员、政策制定者和从业者的关注。当前辩论中形成的关键问题之一涉及到在研究、理论、政策和实践方面,APA与家庭暴力的轮廓相契合的程度。特别是,在处理APA时,我们处理家庭暴力的既定工作方式能在多大程度上适用?本文首先回顾了APA的定义和发生率。然后考虑这个问题如何融入最常用于将家庭暴力概念化的“家庭冲突”和“基于性别的暴力”范式。接着文章研究了APA如何呈现出与成人引发的家庭暴力相似但又不同的现象,并确定其不同之处在致力于消除它的过程中带来了哪些特殊挑战。文章最后回顾了处理APA的干预项目,并探讨了它们采用和摒弃家庭暴力实践领域良好做法要素的一些方式。