Meyer Benjamin, Yuen Kenneth S L, Ertl Matthias, Polomac Nenad, Mulert Christoph, Büchel Christian, Kalisch Raffael
Institute for Systems Neuroscience, and Neuroimaging Center Mainz, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, 55131 Mainz, Germany, and
Institute for Systems Neuroscience, and Neuroimaging Center Mainz, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, 55131 Mainz, Germany, and.
J Neurosci. 2015 May 13;35(19):7365-73. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4793-14.2015.
The beneficial effects of placebo treatments on fear and anxiety (placebo anxiolysis) are well known from clinical practice, and there is strong evidence indicating a contribution of treatment expectations to the efficacy of anxiolytic drugs. Although clinically highly relevant, the neural mechanisms underlying placebo anxiolysis are poorly understood. In two studies in humans, we tested whether the administration of an inactive treatment along with verbal suggestions of anxiolysis can attenuate experimentally induced states of phasic fear and/or sustained anxiety. Phasic fear is the response to a well defined threat and includes attentional focusing on the source of threat and concomitant phasic increases of autonomic arousal, whereas in sustained states of anxiety potential and unclear danger requires vigilant scanning of the environment and elevated tonic arousal levels. Our placebo manipulation consistently reduced vigilance measured in terms of undifferentiated reactivity to salient cues (indexed by subjective ratings, skin conductance responses and EEG event-related potentials) and tonic arousal [indexed by cue-unrelated skin conductance levels and enhanced EEG alpha (8-12 Hz) activity], indicating a downregulation of sustained anxiety rather than phasic fear. We also observed a placebo-dependent sustained increase of frontal midline EEG theta (4-7 Hz) power and frontoposterior theta coupling, suggesting the recruitment of frontally based cognitive control functions. Our results thus support the crucial role of treatment expectations in placebo anxiolysis and provide insight into the underlying neural mechanisms.
安慰剂治疗对恐惧和焦虑的有益效果(安慰剂抗焦虑作用)在临床实践中已广为人知,并且有强有力的证据表明治疗期望对抗焦虑药物的疗效有贡献。尽管在临床上高度相关,但安慰剂抗焦虑作用背后的神经机制却知之甚少。在两项针对人类的研究中,我们测试了给予无效治疗并同时给予抗焦虑的言语暗示是否能够减轻实验诱导的阶段性恐惧状态和/或持续性焦虑状态。阶段性恐惧是对明确威胁的反应,包括注意力集中于威胁源以及伴随的自主唤醒阶段性增加,而在持续性焦虑状态下,潜在且不明确的危险需要对环境进行警惕的扫描以及提高紧张性唤醒水平。我们的安慰剂操作持续降低了以对显著线索的无差别反应性衡量的警觉性(通过主观评分、皮肤电传导反应和脑电图事件相关电位来索引)以及紧张性唤醒[通过与线索无关的皮肤电传导水平和增强的脑电图α(8 - 12赫兹)活动来索引],表明持续性焦虑而非阶段性恐惧得到了下调。我们还观察到额叶中线脑电图θ(4 - 7赫兹)功率和前后θ耦合的安慰剂依赖性持续增加,表明招募了基于额叶的认知控制功能。因此,我们的结果支持了治疗期望在安慰剂抗焦虑作用中的关键作用,并为潜在的神经机制提供了见解。