Ferreira Ashley N, Yousuf Hanna, Dalton Sarah, Sheets Patrick L
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine-South Bend South Bend, IN, USA.
Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Apr 28;9:161. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00161. eCollection 2015.
The infralimbic (IL) cortex is a key node in an inter-connected network involved in fear and emotion processing. The cellular and circuit-level mechanisms whereby IL neurons receive, filter, and modulate incoming signals they project onward to diverse downstream nodes in this complex network remain poorly understood. Using the mouse as our model, we applied anatomical labeling strategies, brain slice electrophysiology, and focal activation of caged glutamate via laser scanning photostimulation (glu-LSPS) for quantitative neurophysiological analysis of projectionally defined neurons in IL. Injection of retrograde tracers into the periaqueductal gray (PAG) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) was used to identify cortico-PAG (CP) and cortico-BLA (CA) neurons in IL. CP neurons were found exclusively in layer 5 (L5) of IL whereas CA neurons were detected throughout layer 2, 3, and 5 of IL. We also identified a small percentage of IL neurons that project to both the PAG and the BLA. We found that L5 CP neurons have a more extensive dendritic structure compared to L5 CA neurons. Neurophysiological recordings performed on retrogradely labeled neurons in acute brain slice showed that CP and CA neurons in IL could be broadly classified in two groups: neuronal resonators and non-resonators. Layer 2 CA neurons were the only class that was exclusively non-resonating. CP, CA, and CP/CA neurons in layers 3 and 5 of IL consisted of heterogeneous populations of resonators and non-resonators showing that projection target is not an exclusive predictor of intrinsic physiology. Circuit mapping using glu-LSPS revealed that the strength and organization of local excitatory and inhibitory inputs were stronger to CP compared to CA neurons in IL. Together, our results establish an organizational scheme linking cellular neurophysiology with microcircuit parameters of defined neuronal subclasses in IL that send descending commands to subcortical structures involved in fear behavior.
边缘下(IL)皮质是参与恐惧和情绪处理的相互连接网络中的关键节点。在这个复杂网络中,IL神经元接收、过滤并调节传入信号,然后将其投射到不同的下游节点,其细胞和回路水平的机制仍知之甚少。以小鼠为模型,我们应用了解剖标记策略、脑片电生理学以及通过激光扫描光刺激(glu-LSPS)对笼锁型谷氨酸进行局部激活,以对IL中投射定义的神经元进行定量神经生理学分析。将逆行示踪剂注射到导水管周围灰质(PAG)和基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)中,用于识别IL中的皮质-PAG(CP)和皮质-BLA(CA)神经元。发现CP神经元仅存在于IL的第5层(L5),而CA神经元在IL的第2、3和5层均有检测到。我们还鉴定出一小部分同时投射到PAG和BLA的IL神经元。我们发现,与L5 CA神经元相比,L5 CP神经元具有更广泛的树突结构。在急性脑片中对逆行标记的神经元进行的神经生理学记录表明,IL中的CP和CA神经元可大致分为两组:神经元谐振器和非谐振器。第2层CA神经元是唯一完全不谐振的类别。IL第3和5层中的CP、CA和CP/CA神经元由谐振器和非谐振器的异质群体组成,这表明投射靶点不是内在生理学的唯一预测指标。使用glu-LSPS进行的回路映射显示,与IL中的CA神经元相比,CP的局部兴奋性和抑制性输入的强度和组织更强。总之,我们的结果建立了一种组织方案,将细胞神经生理学与IL中特定神经元亚类的微回路参数联系起来,这些神经元亚类向参与恐惧行为的皮质下结构发送下行指令。