Kakkos Stavros K, Tsolakis Ioannis A, Papadoulas Spyros I, Lampropoulos George C, Papachristou Evangelos E, Christeas Nikolaos C, Goumenos Dimitrios, Lazarides Miltos K
Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Patras , Patras , Greece.
Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Patras , Patras , Greece.
Front Surg. 2015 Apr 29;2:14. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00014. eCollection 2015.
It is unclear if brachio-basilic vein fistula should be performed as a primary or staged procedure, particularly for smaller basilic veins. Our aim was to report on a randomized controlled trial comparing these two techniques.
Sixteen patients with a basilic vein ≥2.5 mm were randomized into primary transposed brachio-basilic vein (TBBV) fistula (n = 9) and staged TBBV fistula (n = 7). Patients with basilic veins enlarged by previous arteriovenous fistulas were excluded. Baseline characteristics of the two study groups, including vein size, were comparable (median basilic vein diameter 3.5 mm, range 2.8-4.1 mm). The staged group had a brachio-basilic vein fistula performed first followed by the transposition procedure performed at least 6 weeks later to allow the basilic vein to enlarge. TBBV fistula maturation at 10 weeks, primary, assisted-primary, and secondary patency were the primary outcome measures. Early failures were included in the calculation of patency rates.
Transposed brachio-basilic vein fistula maturation rate after primary procedures (3/9, 33%) was lower compared to maturation rate after staged procedures (7/7, 100%, P = 0.011, Fisher's exact test), which led to premature termination of the trial. Time to hemodialysis [median (interquartile range)] of primary and staged procedures was 54 (51.5-113.5) days and 97 (93-126) days, respectively (P = 0.16). One-year primary and assisted-primary patency rates of primary and staged procedures were equivalent (44 vs 57%, P = 0.76 and 44 vs 71%, P = 0.29, respectively); however, there was a trend toward a better 1-year secondary patency after staged procedures (86 vs 44% for primary procedures, P = 0.09).
Among candidates for TBBV fistula with a small basilic vein, staged transposition achieves higher maturation rates compared to primary procedures, a difference reflected in long-term secondary patency.
www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT01274117.
目前尚不清楚肱-贵要静脉内瘘应作为一期手术还是分期手术进行,尤其是对于较细的贵要静脉。我们的目的是报告一项比较这两种技术的随机对照试验。
16例贵要静脉直径≥2.5mm的患者被随机分为一期转位肱-贵要静脉(TBBV)内瘘组(n = 9)和分期TBBV内瘘组(n = 7)。排除因既往动静脉内瘘导致贵要静脉增粗的患者。两个研究组的基线特征,包括静脉大小,具有可比性(贵要静脉直径中位数3.5mm,范围2.8 - 4.1mm)。分期组先进行肱-贵要静脉内瘘手术,至少6周后再进行转位手术,以使贵要静脉增粗。主要观察指标为10周时TBBV内瘘的成熟情况、一期通畅率、辅助一期通畅率和二期通畅率。早期失败病例纳入通畅率计算。
一期手术后转位肱-贵要静脉内瘘的成熟率(3/9,33%)低于分期手术后的成熟率(7/7,100%,P = 0.011,Fisher精确检验),这导致试验提前终止。一期手术和分期手术开始血液透析的时间[中位数(四分位间距)]分别为54(51.5 - 113.5)天和97(93 - 126)天(P = 0.16)。一期手术和分期手术的1年期一期通畅率和辅助一期通畅率相当(分别为44%对57%,P = 0.76和44%对71%,P = 0.29);然而,分期手术后1年期二期通畅率有更好的趋势(一期手术为86%对44%,P = 0.09)。
在贵要静脉较细的TBBV内瘘候选患者中,分期转位手术与一期手术相比可获得更高的成熟率,这种差异在长期二期通畅率中得以体现。