Mehra Ketan, Manikandan Ramanitharan, Dorairajan Lalgudi N, Sreenivasan Kodakkattil Sreerag, Kalra Sidhartha, Kumar Rajeev, Murali Padyala
Urology and Renal Transplantation, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, IND.
Urology and Renal Transplantation, Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, IND.
Cureus. 2020 Aug 22;12(8):e9949. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9949.
Introduction Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are considered a better option for long-term dialysis access. The distal radiocephalic AVF is the most preferred followed by proximal radiocephalic, brachiocephalic and brachiobasilic AVFs (BBAVF) with basilic vein transposition. In case of failure of AVF at other anatomical locations, BBAVF may improve the outcomes for patients needing dialysis for long term. The two-stage technique of BBAVF has easier dissection and lesser devascularisation risk. The disadvantages are need for two interventions and delay in maturation. Materials and Method It was a retrospective observational study including 42 patients who underwent transposition of BBAVF as two-stage procedure from June 2014 to July 2018. The data recorded were demographic characteristics, such as median age, gender, dialysis status at AVF creation and operative duration. Complications like postoperative limb oedema, bleeding and thrombosis of AVF were recorded. Patency and access outcome of AVF were documented at three-month follow-up. Results Among 42 patients, 27 (64.3%) were males. The median age was 50 years. Around 14% of patients had minor complications like oedema. Eight (19%) patients needed re-exploration due to bleeding or thrombosis. The early access failure rate that is a failure before discharge was 4.7%. The patency rate at three months was 90.5%, but the primary functional rate was 74%. Conclusion Transposition of BBAVF as a two-step technique is associated with reasonable patency rate and primary functional rate. The related complications were low, and a good number of fistulae could be saved with timely intervention.
引言 动静脉内瘘(AVF)被认为是长期透析通路的更佳选择。远端桡动脉-头静脉内瘘是最优选的,其次是近端桡动脉-头静脉内瘘、肱动脉-头静脉内瘘和经贵要静脉转位的肱动脉-贵要静脉内瘘(BBAVF)。在其他解剖部位的AVF失败的情况下,BBAVF可能改善长期需要透析患者的治疗效果。BBAVF的两阶段技术解剖更容易,血管化风险更低。缺点是需要两次干预以及成熟延迟。
材料与方法 这是一项回顾性观察性研究,纳入了2014年6月至2018年7月期间接受两阶段BBAVF转位手术的42例患者。记录的数据包括人口统计学特征,如年龄中位数、性别、造瘘时的透析状态和手术持续时间。记录术后肢体水肿、出血和AVF血栓形成等并发症。在三个月随访时记录AVF的通畅情况和通路结局。
结果 在42例患者中,27例(64.3%)为男性。年龄中位数为50岁。约14%的患者有水肿等轻微并发症。8例(19%)患者因出血或血栓形成需要再次手术探查。早期通路失败率即出院前失败率为4.7%。三个月时的通畅率为90.5%,但主要功能率为74%。
结论 两阶段技术的BBAVF转位具有合理的通畅率和主要功能率。相关并发症发生率低,通过及时干预可挽救大量内瘘。