• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先前的预期有助于感知决策的元认知。

Prior expectations facilitate metacognition for perceptual decision.

作者信息

Sherman M T, Seth A K, Barrett A B, Kanai R

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QH, UK; Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QJ, UK.

Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QJ, UK; Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QJ, UK.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2015 Sep;35:53-65. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 May 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2015.04.015
PMID:25973773
Abstract

The influential framework of 'predictive processing' suggests that prior probabilistic expectations influence, or even constitute, perceptual contents. This notion is evidenced by the facilitation of low-level perceptual processing by expectations. However, whether expectations can facilitate high-level components of perception remains unclear. We addressed this question by considering the influence of expectations on perceptual metacognition. To isolate the effects of expectation from those of attention we used a novel factorial design: expectation was manipulated by changing the probability that a Gabor target would be presented; attention was manipulated by instructing participants to perform or ignore a concurrent visual search task. We found that, independently of attention, metacognition improved when yes/no responses were congruent with expectations of target presence/absence. Results were modeled under a novel Bayesian signal detection theoretic framework which integrates bottom-up signal propagation with top-down influences, to provide a unified description of the mechanisms underlying perceptual decision and metacognition.

摘要

“预测性处理”这一有影响力的框架表明,先前的概率期望会影响甚至构成感知内容。期望对低层次感知处理的促进作用证明了这一概念。然而,期望是否能促进感知的高层次成分仍不清楚。我们通过考虑期望对感知元认知的影响来解决这个问题。为了将期望的影响与注意力的影响区分开来,我们采用了一种新颖的析因设计:通过改变呈现Gabor目标的概率来操纵期望;通过指示参与者执行或忽略同时进行的视觉搜索任务来操纵注意力。我们发现,与注意力无关,当“是/否”反应与目标存在/不存在的期望一致时,元认知会得到改善。结果在一个新颖的贝叶斯信号检测理论框架下进行建模,该框架将自下而上的信号传播与自上而下的影响相结合,以统一描述感知决策和元认知背后的机制。

相似文献

1
Prior expectations facilitate metacognition for perceptual decision.先前的预期有助于感知决策的元认知。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Sep;35:53-65. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.04.015. Epub 2015 May 16.
2
Rhythmic Influence of Top-Down Perceptual Priors in the Phase of Prestimulus Occipital Alpha Oscillations.自上而下的感知先验在刺激前枕叶阿尔法振荡阶段的节律性影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Sep;28(9):1318-30. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00973. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
3
Raised visual contrast thresholds with intact attention and metacognition in functional motor disorder.功能性运动障碍中视觉对比阈值升高,注意力和元认知功能正常。
Cortex. 2020 Apr;125:161-174. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.009. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
4
Confidence Leak in Perceptual Decision Making.知觉决策中的信心泄露
Psychol Sci. 2015 Nov;26(11):1664-80. doi: 10.1177/0956797615595037. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
5
On the independence of visual awareness and metacognition: a signal detection theoretic analysis.关于视觉意识与元认知的独立性:一种信号检测理论分析
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Apr;41(2):269-276. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000026. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
6
Heuristic use of perceptual evidence leads to dissociation between performance and metacognitive sensitivity.对感知证据的启发式使用导致了表现与元认知敏感性之间的分离。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Apr;78(3):923-37. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1059-x.
7
Explicitly versus implicitly driven temporal expectations: No evidence for altered perceptual processing due to top-down modulations.明确驱动与隐式驱动的时间预期:没有证据表明自上而下的调制会改变感知处理。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1793-1807. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01879-1.
8
Expectations about precision bias metacognition and awareness.对精度偏差元认知和意识的期望。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Aug;152(8):2177-2189. doi: 10.1037/xge0001371. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
9
Great expectations: temporal expectation modulates perceptual processing speed.高度期待:时间期待调节知觉加工速度。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Oct;38(5):1183-91. doi: 10.1037/a0026343. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
10
Additive and interactive effects of spatial attention and expectation on perceptual decisions.空间注意和期望对知觉决策的累加和交互作用。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 30;8(1):6732. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24703-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Oscillatory signatures of monitoring and anticipatory strategies for probabilistic vs deterministic cues.概率性线索与确定性线索的监测和预期策略的振荡特征。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Mar 7;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00496. eCollection 2025.
2
Pre-stimulus beta power mediates explicit and implicit perceptual biases in distinct cortical areas.刺激前的β波功率在不同的皮层区域中介导显性和隐性感知偏差。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jun 21;3(1):93. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00265-y.
3
Preparing to act follows Bayesian inference rules.准备行动遵循贝叶斯推理规则。
iScience. 2025 May 12;28(6):112645. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112645. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
4
Confidence reports during perceptual decision making dissociate from changes in subjective experience.知觉决策过程中的信心报告与主观体验的变化相分离。
Commun Psychol. 2025 May 21;3(1):81. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00257-y.
5
Prior Information Shapes Perceptual Confidence.先验信息塑造感知信心。
J Cogn. 2025 Jan 7;8(1):11. doi: 10.5334/joc.417. eCollection 2025.
6
"Sentio ergo est": Unmasking the psychological realities of emotional misperception.“我感知,故我在”:揭开情绪误判的心理真相。
Perception. 2025 Jan;54(1):3-31. doi: 10.1177/03010066241302996. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
7
Viewed touch influences tactile detection by altering decision criterion.视觉触摸通过改变决策标准来影响触觉检测。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Nov;86(8):2844-2865. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02959-7. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
8
Pharmacological Elevation of Catecholamine Levels Improves Perceptual Decisions, But Not Metacognitive Insight.提高儿茶酚胺水平的药理学作用可以改善知觉决策,但不能改善元认知洞察。
eNeuro. 2024 Jul 29;11(7). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0019-24.2024. Print 2024 Jul.
9
Knowing that you know that you know? An extreme-confidence heuristic can lead to above-chance discrimination of metacognitive performance.知道你知道你知道?一种极端自信启发式方法可导致对元认知表现的高于机遇水平的辨别。
Neurosci Conscious. 2024 May 22;2024(1):niae020. doi: 10.1093/nc/niae020. eCollection 2024.
10
Prior information differentially affects discrimination decisions and subjective confidence reports.先前信息会对辨别决策和主观置信报告产生差异影响。
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 6;14(1):5473. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41112-0.