Matthews Julian, Nagao Kanae, Ding Catherine, Newby Rachel, Kempster Peter, Hohwy Jakob
Cognition & Philosophy Lab, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Neurosciences Department, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Australia.
Cortex. 2020 Apr;125:161-174. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.009. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
Functional motor disorders (FMDs) are distinguished by signs that lack congruence with recognised patterns of organic disease and show inconsistency over time. Their pathophysiology is poorly understood, but there is evidence that irregularities in perceptual and cognitive processing lie at the heart of these conditions. Here, we draw on a predictive coding account of functional neurological disorders to study perceptual decision-making in three groups: 20 patients with FMDs (14 with functional movements and 6 with functional weakness), 20 with phenotypically-matched organic motor disorders, and 20 age-matched healthy controls. We examine four cognitive domains with putative roles in FMD pathogenesis: attention, expectations, sensory processing (perceptual sensitivity), and metacognition (introspective evaluation of performance). We augmented a dual-task paradigm, manipulating the visual contrast required for target detection to examine these domains in one design. With sensory input (stimulus contrast) psychometrically adjusted to staircase target detection at a fixed level for all groups, the FMD group exhibited statistically equivalent attentional, expectational and metacognitive processing to healthy controls. However, we demonstrate Bayesian evidence and a frequentist trend that FMD patients require higher visual contrast than controls to maintain the same detection sensitivity (BF = 8.1, p = .066). This was statistically equivalent to the visual contrast required by the organic group, and unlikely to be accounted for by medication use or comorbid psychopathology. The organic group showed differences in processing of attention and expectations for target detection that were not observed in either healthy controls or the functional group. The distinctive behavioural profile of FMDs may arise from abnormalities in basic sensory processing, while higher attentional, expectational and metacognitive mechanisms remain intact. Conceptualising functional neurological disorders under a predictive coding account may consolidate and refine existing pathophysiological theories about them.
功能性运动障碍(FMDs)的特征是其体征与公认的器质性疾病模式不一致,且随时间表现出不稳定性。其病理生理学尚不清楚,但有证据表明,感知和认知加工的异常是这些病症的核心所在。在此,我们借鉴功能性神经障碍的预测编码理论,对三组人群的感知决策进行研究:20例功能性运动障碍患者(14例功能性运动障碍和6例功能性肌无力)、20例表型匹配的器质性运动障碍患者以及20例年龄匹配的健康对照者。我们考察了在FMD发病机制中可能起作用的四个认知领域:注意力、期望、感觉加工(感知敏感性)和元认知(对表现的内省评估)。我们改进了一个双任务范式,通过操纵目标检测所需的视觉对比度,在一个设计中考察这些领域。在将所有组的感觉输入(刺激对比度)根据心理测量学调整到固定水平的阶梯式目标检测时,FMD组在注意力、期望和元认知加工方面与健康对照者在统计学上相当。然而,我们证明了贝叶斯证据和频率学派趋势,即FMD患者需要比对照组更高的视觉对比度才能维持相同的检测敏感性(贝叶斯因子 = 8.1,p = 0.066)。这在统计学上与器质性疾病组所需的视觉对比度相当,不太可能由药物使用或共病精神病理学解释。器质性疾病组在目标检测的注意力和期望加工方面存在差异,而在健康对照组或功能性疾病组中未观察到这些差异。FMDs独特的行为特征可能源于基本感觉加工的异常,而更高层次的注意力、期望和元认知机制保持完好。在预测编码理论下对功能性神经障碍进行概念化,可能会巩固和完善现有的关于它们的病理生理学理论。