Wang Fei, Li Shu, Bai Xin-Wen, Ren Xiao-Peng, Rao Li-Lin, Li Jin-Zhen, Liu Huan, Liu Hong-Zhi, Wu Bin, Zheng Rui
Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; School of Journalism and Communication, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Management School, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
PLoS One. 2015 May 14;10(5):e0125821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125821. eCollection 2015.
Understanding urbanization and evaluating its impact are vital for formulating global sustainable development. The results obtained from evaluating the impact of urbanization, however, depend on the kind of measurement used. With the goal of increasing our understanding of the impact of urbanization, we developed direct and indirect subjective indicators to measure how people assess their living situation. The survey revealed that the projected endorsements and perceived social ambiance of people toward living in different types of settlements did not improve along with the urbanization level in China. The assessment scores from the city dwellers were not significantly different from those from the country areas and, more surprisingly, both were significantly higher than the assessment scores of the town dwellers, which we had expected to fall between the assessment scores of the country and city dwellers. Instead their scores were the lowest. We dubbed this V-shaped relationship the "town dislocation effect." When searching for a potential explanation for this effect, we found additional town dislocation effects in social support, loss aversion, and receptivity toward genetically modified food. Further analysis showed that only social support mediated the relationship between the three tiers of settlements (cities, country areas, and towns) and the subjective indicator. The projected endorsements yielded significant subjective assessments that could enhance our understanding of Chinese urbanization. Towns posed specific problems that require special attention.
理解城市化并评估其影响对于制定全球可持续发展至关重要。然而,评估城市化影响所获得的结果取决于所使用的测量方式。为了增进我们对城市化影响的理解,我们开发了直接和间接主观指标来衡量人们如何评估他们的生活状况。调查显示,在中国,人们对居住在不同类型住区的预期认可度和感知社会氛围并未随着城市化水平的提高而改善。城市居民的评估得分与农村地区居民的得分没有显著差异,更令人惊讶的是,两者均显著高于城镇居民的评估得分,而我们原本预计城镇居民的得分会介于农村和城市居民的评估得分之间。相反,他们的得分是最低的。我们将这种V形关系称为“城镇错位效应”。在寻找这种效应的潜在解释时,我们在社会支持、损失厌恶和对转基因食品的接受度方面发现了更多的城镇错位效应。进一步分析表明,只有社会支持在三类住区(城市、农村和城镇)与主观指标之间的关系中起中介作用。预期认可度产生了显著的主观评估,这有助于增进我们对中国城市化的理解。城镇存在一些需要特别关注的具体问题。