Suppr超能文献

基础膀胱建议对遗尿症无效:一项随机对照试验。

No effect of basic bladder advice in enuresis: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Cederblad Maria, Sarkadi Anna, Engvall Gunn, Nevéus Tryggve

机构信息

Dept. of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Dept. of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Jun;11(3):153.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are two firstline, evidence-based treatments available for nocturnal enuresis: desmopressin and the enuresis alarm. Prior to use of these therapies, international experts usually recommend that the children also be given basic bladder training during the daytime. The rationale behind this recommendation is that daytime bladder training or urotherapy, is a mainstay in the treatment of daytime incontinence caused by detrusor overactivity. Still, there is, as yet, no firm evidence that daytime bladder training is useful against nocturnal enuresis.

AIM

To explore whether basic bladder advice has any effect against nocturnal enuresis.

STUDY DESIGN

The study was prospective, randomized, and controlled. The evaluated intervention was bladder advice, given in accordance with ICCS guidelines and focused on regular voiding, sound voiding posture, and sufficient fluid intake. Forty children aged 6 years or more with previously untreated enuresis, but no daytime incontinence, were randomized (20 in each group) to receive either first basic bladder advice for 1 month and then alarm therapy (group A) or just the alarm therapy (group B). Based on power calculations, the minimum number of children required in each treatment arm was 15.

RESULTS

The basic bladder advice did not reduce the enuresis frequency in group A (p = 0.089) and the end result after alarm therapy did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.74) (see Table). Only four children in group A had a partial or full response to bladder training, and two of these children relapsed immediately during alarm therapy.

DISCUSSION

This was the first study to evaluate, in a prospective, randomized manner, the value of daytime basic bladder training as a treatment of enuresis. It was found that the treatment neither resulted in a significant reduction in the number of wet nights, nor did it improve the success of subsequent alarm therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommendation that all children with enuresis be given bladder training as a firstline therapy can no longer be supported. Instead, we recommend that treatment of these children start with the enuresis alarm or desmopressin without delay.

摘要

背景

治疗夜间遗尿症有两种一线循证疗法:去氨加压素和遗尿报警器。在使用这些疗法之前,国际专家通常建议在白天对患儿进行基本的膀胱训练。这一建议背后的理论依据是,白天膀胱训练或尿疗法是治疗逼尿肌过度活动引起的白天尿失禁的主要方法。然而,目前尚无确凿证据表明白天膀胱训练对夜间遗尿症有效。

目的

探讨基本膀胱建议对夜间遗尿症是否有任何效果。

研究设计

该研究为前瞻性、随机对照研究。评估的干预措施是按照国际儿童尿控协会(ICCS)指南给出的膀胱建议,重点是规律排尿、正确的排尿姿势和充足的液体摄入。40名6岁及以上之前未接受过治疗的遗尿症患儿,但无白天尿失禁,被随机分组(每组20名),一组先接受1个月的基本膀胱建议,然后接受报警器疗法(A组),另一组仅接受报警器疗法(B组)。根据功效计算,每个治疗组所需的儿童最小数量为15名。

结果

A组的基本膀胱建议并未降低遗尿频率(p = 0.089),两组在报警器疗法后的最终结果无差异(p = 0.74)(见表)。A组中只有4名儿童对膀胱训练有部分或完全反应,其中2名儿童在报警器疗法期间立即复发。

讨论

这是第一项以前瞻性、随机方式评估白天基本膀胱训练作为遗尿症治疗方法价值的研究。研究发现,该治疗方法既未显著减少尿床次数,也未提高后续报警器疗法的成功率。

结论

不再支持所有遗尿症患儿都应接受膀胱训练作为一线治疗方法的建议。相反,我们建议这些患儿应立即开始使用遗尿报警器或去氨加压素进行治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验