• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产术中放置的Nova-T380、Multiload 375和铜T380A避孕装置的排出情况。

Expulsion of Nova-T380, Multiload 375, and Copper-T380A contraceptive devices inserted during cesarean delivery.

作者信息

Ragab Ahmed, Hamed Hossam O, Alsammani Mohamed A, Shalaby Hend, Nabeil Hanan, Barakat Rafik, Fetih Ahmed N

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Qassim University, Burraidah, Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Qassim University, Burraidah, Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Health Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Aug;130(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.025
PMID:25975871
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the expulsion rate of Nova-T380, Multiload 375, and Copper-T380A intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) inserted during cesarean delivery.

METHODS

A comparative randomized study was conducted between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014, in three maternity centers in Egypt and Saudi Arabia. All women scheduled for an elective cesarean and accepting intraoperative insertion of an IUCD were randomly allocated to receive the Nova-T380 (group 1), Multiload 375 (group 2), or Cu-T380A (group 3) using a computer-generated table. Researchers and participants were not masked to the type of IUCD. Follow-up was for 1 year. The primary outcome was IUCD expulsion (complete or partial [i.e. displacement]).

RESULTS

Each group contained 40 participants. At 1 year, expulsion had been reported for 5 (13%) women in group 1, 2 (5%) in group 2, and 6 (15%) in group 3 (P>0.05 for all). The frequency of displacement was significantly lower in group 2 (5 [13%] participants) than in group 1 (15 [38%]; P=0.001) and group 3 (14 [35%]; P=0.008).

CONCLUSION

Despite a comparable risk of expulsion following IUCD insertion during cesarean delivery, the Multiload 375 device showed the lowest risk of displacement.

摘要

目的

比较剖宫产术中插入的Nova-T380、Multiload 375和铜T380A宫内节育器(IUCD)的排出率。

方法

2013年1月1日至2014年6月30日,在埃及和沙特阿拉伯的三个产科中心进行了一项比较随机研究。所有计划进行择期剖宫产并接受术中插入IUCD的妇女,使用计算机生成的表格随机分配接受Nova-T380(第1组)、Multiload 375(第2组)或铜T380A(第3组)。研究人员和参与者未对IUCD的类型进行盲法处理。随访1年。主要结局是IUCD排出(完全或部分[即移位])。

结果

每组有40名参与者。1年时,第1组有5名(13%)妇女报告排出,第2组有2名(5%),第3组有6名(15%)(所有P>0.05)。第2组(5名[13%]参与者)的移位频率显著低于第1组(15名[38%];P=0.001)和第3组(14名[35%];P=0.008)。

结论

尽管剖宫产术中插入IUCD后排出风险相当,但Multiload 375装置的移位风险最低。

相似文献

1
Expulsion of Nova-T380, Multiload 375, and Copper-T380A contraceptive devices inserted during cesarean delivery.剖宫产术中放置的Nova-T380、Multiload 375和铜T380A避孕装置的排出情况。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Aug;130(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 May 6.
2
Five-year follow-up of two types of contraceptive device fitted during elective cesarean delivery.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Aug;130(2):179-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.02.031. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
3
Does change in the shape of intrauterine contraceptive device Cu 375 and Cu T 380A affect the expulsion after post-partum insertion - a prospective randomized control trial.产后即刻放置宫内节育器(Cu375 和 CuT380A),其形态改变是否会影响其脱落——一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2023 Jun;28(3):153-162. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2023.2188104. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
4
Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.铜T 380A宫内节育器与多负载铜375/250宫内节育器在一项对比临床试验中的性能表现。
Afr J Med Med Sci. 1995 Mar;24(1):59-65.
5
Conventional manual technique of post placental IUD insertion versus intra-cesarean post placental introducer withdrawal IUD insertion technique: a new standardized technique for IUD insertion during cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial.常规胎盘娩出后 IUD 放置术与剖宫产术中胎盘娩出后导尿管取出器 IUD 放置术比较:剖宫产术中放置 IUD 的一种新标准化技术:随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jun 26;23(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05777-1.
6
Puerperal and menstrual bleeding patterns with different types of contraceptive device fitted during elective cesarean delivery.剖宫产术中不同类型避孕器放置后产褥期和月经期出血模式。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Jan;116(1):31-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.07.036. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
7
A randomized trial on the clinical performance of Nova T380 and Gyne T380 Slimline copper IUDs.一项关于Nova T380和Gyne T380 Slimline铜宫内节育器临床性能的随机试验。
Contraception. 2007 Mar;75(3):171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.09.005. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
8
Insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device at caesarean section.剖宫产术中放置宫内节育器
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011 Sep;21(9):527-30.
9
Current status of frameless anchored IUD for immediate intracesarean insertion.用于剖宫产术中即时放置的无框架固定式宫内节育器的现状
Dev Period Med. 2016 Jan-Mar;20(1):7-15.
10
Factors associated with missing strings and expulsion after postplacental insertion of copper T380A intrauterine devices.产后放置铜T380A宫内节育器后与脱失及取出相关的因素。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Apr;157(1):67-75. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13806. Epub 2021 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024.美国避孕方法医学适用标准,2024 年版。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024 Aug 8;73(4):1-126. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7304a1.
2
Utilisation, effectiveness, and safety of immediate postpartum intrauterine device insertion: a systematic literature review.产后即时宫内节育器放置的使用、效果和安全性:系统文献回顾。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Apr;49(2):e1. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201579. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
3
Assessment of a Novel Fixation Method of a Frameless Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Inserted during Cesarean Delivery as a Means of Preventing Displacements and Expulsions: A Prospective Observational Study.
剖宫产术中插入的无框架宫内节育器新型固定方法预防移位和排出的评估:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Life (Basel). 2022 Jan 7;12(1):83. doi: 10.3390/life12010083.
4
Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.产后即时放置、分娩方式和宫内节育器类型与宫内节育器脱落的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):177-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.045. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
5
A Decision Analysis Model of 1-Year Effectiveness of Intended Postplacental Compared With Intended Delayed Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion.一种旨在比较胎盘后即刻与产后延迟放置宫内节育器 1 年效果的决策分析模型。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;132(5):1211-1221. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002926.
6
Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.产后放置宫内节育器后脱落:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;132(4):895-905. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002822.
7
Intra-cesarean insertion and fixation of frameless intrauterine devices.剖宫产术中无框架宫内节育器的置入与固定
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;14(1):64-66. doi: 10.4274/tjod.90532. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
8
Insertion of intrauterine devices after cesarean section: a systematic review update.剖宫产术后宫内节育器的放置:系统评价更新
Int J Womens Health. 2017 Apr 18;9:205-212. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S132391. eCollection 2017.