Symonds Erin L, Osborne Joanne M, Cole Stephen R, Bampton Peter A, Fraser Robert J L, Young Graeme P
Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia Bowel Health Service, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, South Australia
Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia Bowel Health Service, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, South Australia.
J Med Screen. 2015 Dec;22(4):187-93. doi: 10.1177/0969141315584783. Epub 2015 May 14.
Positive rates in faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer screening programmes vary, suggesting that differences between programmes may affect test results. We examined whether demographic, pathological, behavioural, and environmental factors affected haemoglobin concentration and positive rates where samples are mailed.
A retrospective cohort study; 34,298 collection devices were sent, over five years, to screening invitees (median age 60.6). Participant demographics, temperature on sample postage day, and previous screening were recorded. Outcomes from colonoscopy performed within a year following FIT were collected. Multivariate logistic regression identified significant predictors of test positivity.
Higher positive rate was independently associated with male gender, older age, lower socioeconomic status, and distally located neoplasia, and negatively associated with previous screening (p < 0.05). Older males had higher faecal haemoglobin concentrations and were less likely to have a false positive result at colonoscopy (p < 0.05). High temperature on the sample postage day was associated with reduced haemoglobin concentration and positivity rate (26-35℃: Odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.93), but was not associated with missed significant neoplasia at colonoscopy (p > 0.05).
Haemoglobin concentrations, and therefore FIT positivity, were affected by factors that vary between screening programmes. Participant demographics and high temperature at postage had significant effects. The impact of temperature could be reduced by seasonal scheduling of invitations. The importance of screening, and following up positive test results, particularly in older males, should be promoted.
基于粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)的结直肠癌筛查项目的阳性率各不相同,这表明不同项目之间的差异可能会影响检测结果。我们研究了人口统计学、病理学、行为学和环境因素是否会影响邮寄样本时的血红蛋白浓度和阳性率。
一项回顾性队列研究;在五年时间里,向筛查受邀者(中位年龄60.6岁)发送了34298个采集装置。记录参与者的人口统计学信息、样本邮寄当天的温度以及既往筛查情况。收集FIT后一年内进行结肠镜检查的结果。多因素逻辑回归分析确定检测阳性的显著预测因素。
较高的阳性率与男性、年龄较大、社会经济地位较低以及肿瘤位于远端独立相关,与既往筛查呈负相关(p<0.05)。老年男性的粪便血红蛋白浓度较高,结肠镜检查时出现假阳性结果的可能性较小(p<0.05)。样本邮寄当天的高温与血红蛋白浓度降低和阳性率降低相关(26-35℃:比值比0.78,95%置信区间0.66-0.93),但与结肠镜检查时漏诊重大肿瘤无关(p>0.05)。
血红蛋白浓度以及FIT阳性率受到筛查项目之间存在差异的因素影响。参与者的人口统计学信息和邮寄时的高温有显著影响。通过邀请的季节性安排可以降低温度的影响。应提高筛查以及对阳性检测结果进行随访的重要性,尤其是在老年男性中。