• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化在参与疾病控制与预防中心结直肠癌控制计划的卫生系统中,对粪便检查异常后的结肠镜检查随访的跟踪和完成。

Optimizing tracking and completion of follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal stool tests at health systems participating in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program.

机构信息

Implenomics, 8 The Green, Suite # 6172, Dover, DE, 19901, USA.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Nov;35(11):1467-1476. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01898-w. Epub 2024 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10552-024-01898-w
PMID:39107449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11670815/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We present findings from an assessment of award recipients' partners from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP). We describe partners' processes of identifying and tracking patients undergoing stool-based screening.

METHODS

We analyzed data from eight CRCCP award recipients purposively sampled and their partner health systems from 2019 to 2023. The data included number of stool-based tests distributed and returned; abnormal findings; referrals and completion of follow-up colonoscopies; and colonoscopy findings. We also report on strategies to improve tracking of stool-based tests and facilitation of follow-up colonoscopies.

RESULTS

Five of eight CRCCP award recipients reported that all or some partner health systems were able to report stool test return rates. Six had health systems that were able to report abnormal stool test findings. Two reported that health systems could track time to follow-up colonoscopy completion from date of referral, while four could report colonoscopy completion but not the timeframe. Follow-up colonoscopy completion varied substantially from 24.2 to 75.5% (average of 47.9%). Strategies to improve identifying and tracking screening focused mainly on the use of electronic medical records; strategies to facilitate follow-up colonoscopy were multi-level.

CONCLUSION

Health systems vary in their ability to track steps in the stool-based screening process and few health systems can track time to completion of follow-up colonoscopy. Longer time intervals can result in more advanced disease. CRCCP-associated health systems participating in this study could support the implementation of multicomponent strategies at the individual, provider, and health system levels to improve tracking and completion of follow-up colonoscopy.

摘要

目的

我们介绍了美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)结直肠癌控制计划(CRCCP)对获奖者伴侣的评估结果。我们描述了伴侣识别和跟踪接受粪便筛查的患者的过程。

方法

我们分析了 2019 年至 2023 年期间从 8 名 CRCCP 获奖者和他们的合作伙伴健康系统中有意抽取的数据。这些数据包括分发和返回的粪便检测数量、异常发现、转诊和完成随访结肠镜检查的情况以及结肠镜检查的结果。我们还报告了改善粪便检测跟踪和促进后续结肠镜检查的策略。

结果

8 名 CRCCP 获奖者中有 5 名报告说,所有或部分合作伙伴健康系统能够报告粪便检测的返回率。6 个系统能够报告异常粪便检测结果。2 个系统能够跟踪从转诊日期到完成随访结肠镜检查的时间,而 4 个系统能够报告结肠镜检查的完成情况,但不能报告时间框架。随访结肠镜检查的完成率差异很大,从 24.2%到 75.5%(平均为 47.9%)。改善识别和跟踪筛查的策略主要集中在使用电子病历上;促进后续结肠镜检查的策略是多层次的。

结论

健康系统在跟踪粪便筛查过程中的步骤的能力上存在差异,很少有健康系统能够跟踪完成后续结肠镜检查的时间。较长的时间间隔可能导致疾病更严重。参与本研究的 CRCCP 相关健康系统可以支持在个人、提供者和健康系统层面实施多组分策略,以改善跟踪和完成后续结肠镜检查。

相似文献

1
Optimizing tracking and completion of follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal stool tests at health systems participating in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program.优化在参与疾病控制与预防中心结直肠癌控制计划的卫生系统中,对粪便检查异常后的结肠镜检查随访的跟踪和完成。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Nov;35(11):1467-1476. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01898-w. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
2
Costs of colorectal cancer screening provision in CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program: Comparisons of colonoscopy and FOBT/FIT based screening.美国疾病控制与预防中心结直肠癌控制项目中结直肠癌筛查的成本:结肠镜检查与基于粪便潜血试验/粪便免疫化学试验筛查的比较
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Jun;62:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
3
Impact of Patient Adherence to Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening and Colonoscopy Following a Positive Test on Clinical Outcomes.基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查和阳性检测后结肠镜检查中患者依从性对临床结局的影响。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Sep;14(9):845-850. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0075. Epub 2021 May 21.
4
Variations in Screening Quality in a Federal Colorectal Cancer Screening Program for the Uninsured.联邦无保险人群结直肠癌筛查项目中的筛查质量差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 May 30;16:E67. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180452.
5
National Survey of Patient Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening Preferences.全国性调查:影响结直肠癌筛查偏好的患者因素。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 May;14(5):603-614. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0524. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
6
Assessing screening quality in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program.评估疾控中心结直肠癌筛查示范项目中的筛查质量。
Cancer. 2013 Aug 1;119 Suppl 15(0 15):2834-41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28164.
7
Multitarget stool DNA tests increases colorectal cancer screening among previously noncompliant Medicare patients.多靶点粪便DNA检测增加了既往不依从的医疗保险患者的结直肠癌筛查率。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 21;23(3):464-471. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i3.464.
8
Comparison of Program Resources Required for Colonoscopy and Fecal Screening: Findings From 5 Years of the Colorectal Cancer Control Program.结肠镜检查和粪便筛查所需程序资源的比较:来自大肠癌控制计划 5 年的研究结果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Apr 25;16:E50. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180338.
9
Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer: a Multi-Center Pre-Clinical Case Cohort Study for Validation of a Combined DNA Stool Test.结直肠癌的早期检测:一项用于验证联合DNA粪便检测的多中心临床前病例队列研究
Clin Lab. 2018 Oct 1;64(10):1719-1730. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180521.
10
Diagnostic colonoscopy completion after abnormal fecal immunochemical testing and quality of tests used at 8 Federally Qualified Health Centers in Southern California: Opportunities for improving screening outcomes.在加利福尼亚南部 8 家联邦合格健康中心,基于粪便免疫化学检测异常的诊断性结肠镜检查完成情况和检测质量:改善筛查结果的机会。
Cancer. 2019 Dec 1;125(23):4203-4209. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32440. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost of colorectal cancer screening in two tribal health organizations in Alaska.阿拉斯加两个部落卫生组织中结直肠癌筛查的成本。
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02036-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Up-to-Date Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Use in the United States, 2021.2021 年美国最新的乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查检测应用情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Oct 26;20:E94. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230071.
2
Provision of colonoscopy in rural settings: A qualitative assessment of provider context, barriers, facilitators, and capacity.农村地区结肠镜检查的提供:提供者背景、障碍、促进因素和能力的定性评估。
J Rural Health. 2024 Mar;40(2):272-281. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12793. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
3
Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening using the 5As framework: A systematic review of US studies.使用5A框架进行结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素:对美国研究的系统评价
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jul 29;35:102353. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102353. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Rates of Follow-up Colonoscopy After a Positive Stool-Based Screening Test Result for Colorectal Cancer Among Health Care Organizations in the US, 2017-2020.美国医疗保健组织中基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查试验阳性后的结肠镜随访率,2017-2020 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2251384. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.51384.
5
Leveraging Electronic Health Records Data for Enhanced Colorectal Cancer Screening Efforts.利用电子健康记录数据加强结直肠癌筛查工作。
J Appalach Health. 2020 Sep 1;2(4):53-63. doi: 10.13023/jah.0204.07. eCollection 2020.
6
A Practical Overview of the Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening.粪便 DNA 检测在结直肠癌筛查中的应用概述
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr 1;13(4):e00464. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000464.
7
Follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening result: analysis of steps in the colonoscopy completion process.结直肠异常粪便筛查结果后的随访结肠镜检查:结肠镜完成过程中各步骤分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep 28;21(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01923-1.
8
Screening and prevention of colorectal cancer.结直肠癌的筛查与预防。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 15;374:n1855. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1855.
9
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
10
Bridging the Gap: Patient Navigation Increases Colonoscopy Follow-up After Abnormal FIT.弥合差距:患者导航可提高 FIT 异常后的结肠镜检查随访率。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 22;12(2):e00307. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000307.