Rozemeijer Kirsten, van Kemenade Folkert J, Penning Corine, Matthijsse Suzette M, Naber Steffie K, van Rosmalen Joost, van Ballegooijen Marjolein, de Kok Inge M C M
Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Department of Public Health, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands.
J Med Screen. 2015 Sep;22(3):144-50. doi: 10.1177/0969141315580836. Epub 2015 May 14.
Over the last decade, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) detection has increased in the Netherlands. We investigated the underlying mechanism by quantifying the increase, and analyzing patterns of CIN and cervical cancer detection over time.
We observed annual CIN and cervical cancer detection rates (DRs) per 10,000 primary smears within the Dutch screening programme for 2000-2011. Joinpoint analyses were performed to determine changes in time trends, logistic regression analyses to assess the relative risk of calendar time on histological outcomes, adjusted for demographic factors and type of primary cytology test used.
Trends of increased detection occurred for all CIN grades (ie. DRs increased from 17.8 to 36.1, from 21.0 to 35.5, and from 43.4 to 64.6 for CIN I, II, and III from 2003 to 2009). After adjusting for demographic factors, DRs were still 2.11 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.95, 2.29), 1.79 (95% CI: 1.66, 1.92) and 1.59 (95% CI: 1.50, 1.67) times larger in 2009. When also adjusting for the type of cytology test, DRs were 1.90 (95% CI: 1.62, 2.22), 1.48 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.79) and 1.55 (95% CI: 1.39, 1.73) times larger. No trends in cervical cancer DRs were found.
The implementation of liquid-based cytology contributed to the CIN increase. If some of these extra detected CIN are regressive this leads to overdiagnosis. Other factors, such as an increased cervical cancer risk, and implementation of imaging-assisted reading, could also have contributed.
在过去十年中,荷兰宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的检出率有所上升。我们通过量化这种上升幅度,并分析CIN和宫颈癌随时间的检出模式,来探究其潜在机制。
我们观察了2000 - 2011年荷兰筛查项目中每10,000例初次涂片的年度CIN和宫颈癌检出率(DRs)。进行连接点分析以确定时间趋势的变化,进行逻辑回归分析以评估日历时间对组织学结果的相对风险,并对人口统计学因素和所使用的初次细胞学检测类型进行了调整。
所有CIN分级的检出率均呈上升趋势(即2003年至2009年,CIN I、II和III的DRs分别从17.8升至36.1、从21.0升至35.5以及从43.4升至64.6)。在对人口统计学因素进行调整后,2009年的DRs仍分别高出2.11倍(95%置信区间(CI):1.95, 2.29)、1.79倍(95% CI:1.66, 1.92)和1.59倍(95% CI:1.50, 1.67)。在对细胞学检测类型也进行调整后,DRs分别高出1.90倍(95% CI:1.62, 2.22)、1.48倍(95% CI:1.22, 1.79)和1.55倍(95% CI:1.39, 1.73)。未发现宫颈癌DRs的趋势。
液基细胞学的应用导致了CIN检出率的上升。如果这些额外检出的CIN中有一些是退行性的,这将导致过度诊断。其他因素,如宫颈癌风险增加以及影像辅助阅片的应用,也可能起到了一定作用。