García-Hernández Pablo, Prieto Belén, Martínez-Morillo Eduardo, Rodríguez Verónica, Álvarez Francisco V
Clinical Biochemistry, Laboratory of Medicine, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
Clinical Biochemistry, Laboratory of Medicine, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Ann Clin Biochem. 2016 Jan;53(Pt 1):155-63. doi: 10.1177/0004563215589381. Epub 2015 May 14.
Microbiological culture of cerebrospinal fluid is the gold standard to differentiate between aseptic and bacterial meningitis, but this method has low sensitivity. A fast and reliable new marker would be of interest in clinical practice.
Interleukin-6, secreted by T cells in response to meningeal pathogens and quickly delivered into cerebrospinal fluid, was evaluated as a marker of acute meningitis.
A total of 150 cerebrospinal fluid samples were analysed by an electrochemiluminescence method, selected according to patient diagnosis: (a) bacterial meningitis confirmed by positive culture (n = 26); (b) bacterial meningitis with negative culture or not performed (n = 15); (c) viral meningitis confirmed by polymerase chain reaction or immunoglobulin G determination (n = 23); (d) viral meningitis with polymerase chain reaction negative or not performed (n = 42); and (e) controls (n = 44).
Cerebrospinal fluid interleukin-6 concentration showed significant differences between all pathologic groups and the control group (P < 0.001). As a diagnostic tool for bacterial meningitis, interleukin-6 showed an area under the curve of 0.937 (95% confidence intervals: 0.895-0.978), significantly higher than those of classical biomarkers. An interleukin-6 cutoff of 1418 pg/mL showed 95.5% sensitivity and 77.5% specificity, whereas a value of 15,060 pg/mL showed 63.6% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity, for diagnosis of bacterial meningitis.
Interleukin-6 measured by electrochemiluminescence method is a promising marker for early differentiation between aseptic and bacterial meningitis. More studies are needed to validate clinical implications for future practice in an emergency laboratory.
脑脊液微生物培养是区分无菌性和细菌性脑膜炎的金标准,但该方法敏感性较低。临床实践中需要一种快速可靠的新标志物。
评估白细胞介素-6作为急性脑膜炎标志物的价值,其由T细胞响应脑膜病原体分泌并迅速释放至脑脊液中。
根据患者诊断选取150份脑脊液样本,采用电化学发光法进行分析:(a)培养阳性确诊的细菌性脑膜炎(n = 26);(b)培养阴性或未进行培养的细菌性脑膜炎(n = 15);(c)通过聚合酶链反应或免疫球蛋白G测定确诊的病毒性脑膜炎(n = 23);(d)聚合酶链反应阴性或未进行该检测的病毒性脑膜炎(n = 42);以及(e)对照组(n = 44)。
所有病理组与对照组之间脑脊液白细胞介素-6浓度存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。作为细菌性脑膜炎的诊断工具,白细胞介素-6的曲线下面积为0.937(95%置信区间:0.895 - 0.978),显著高于经典生物标志物。诊断细菌性脑膜炎时,白细胞介素-6截断值为1418 pg/mL时敏感性为95.5%,特异性为77.5%;截断值为15060 pg/mL时敏感性为63.6%,特异性为96.7%。
电化学发光法检测的白细胞介素-6是无菌性和细菌性脑膜炎早期鉴别的有前景的标志物。需要更多研究来验证其在急诊实验室未来临床实践中的意义。