Crompot Emerence, Van Damme Michael, Duvillier Hugues, Pieters Karlien, Vermeesch Marjorie, Perez-Morga David, Meuleman Nathalie, Mineur Philippe, Bron Dominique, Lagneaux Laurence, Stamatopoulos Basile
Laboratory of Clinical Cell Therapy, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium.
Hematology Department, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2015 May 15;10(5):e0127209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127209. eCollection 2015.
Microparticles (MPs), also called microvesicles (MVs) are plasma membrane-derived fragments with sizes ranging from 0.1 to 1μm. Characterization of these MPs is often performed by flow cytometry but there is no consensus on the appropriate negative control to use that can lead to false positive results.
We analyzed MPs from platelets, B-cells, T-cells, NK-cells, monocytes, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) B-cells. Cells were purified by positive magnetic-separation and cultured for 48h. Cells and MPs were characterized using the following monoclonal antibodies (CD19,20 for B-cells, CD3,8,5,27 for T-cells, CD16,56 for NK-cells, CD14,11c for monocytes, CD41,61 for platelets). Isolated MPs were stained with annexin-V-FITC and gated between 300nm and 900nm. The latex bead technique was then performed for easy detection of MPs. Samples were analyzed by Transmission (TEM) and Scanning Electron microscopy (SEM).
Annexin-V positive events within a gate of 300-900nm were detected and defined as MPs. Our results confirmed that the characteristic antigens CD41/CD61 were found on platelet-derived-MPs validating our technique. However, for MPs derived from other cell types, we were unable to detect any antigen, although they were clearly expressed on the MP-producing cells in the contrary of several data published in the literature. Using the latex bead technique, we confirmed detection of CD41,61. However, the apparent expression of other antigens (already deemed positive in several studies) was determined to be false positive, indicated by negative controls (same labeling was used on MPs from different origins).
We observed that mother cell antigens were not always detected on corresponding MPs by direct flow cytometry or latex bead cytometry. Our data highlighted that false positive results could be generated due to antibody aspecificity and that phenotypic characterization of MPs is a difficult field requiring the use of several negative controls.
微粒(MPs),也称为微囊泡(MVs),是源自质膜的片段,大小在0.1至1μm之间。这些MPs的表征通常通过流式细胞术进行,但对于可导致假阳性结果的合适阴性对照尚无共识。
我们分析了来自血小板、B细胞、T细胞、自然杀伤细胞(NK细胞)、单核细胞和慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)B细胞的MPs。通过阳性磁分选纯化细胞并培养48小时。使用以下单克隆抗体(B细胞用CD19、20;T细胞用CD3、8、5、27;NK细胞用CD16、56;单核细胞用CD14、11c;血小板用CD41、61)对细胞和MPs进行表征。分离的MPs用膜联蛋白-V-异硫氰酸荧光素(annexin-V-FITC)染色,并在300nm至900nm之间设门。然后采用乳胶珠技术以便于检测MPs。通过透射电子显微镜(TEM)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对样品进行分析。
在300 - 900nm的门内检测到膜联蛋白-V阳性事件,并将其定义为MPs。我们的结果证实,在源自血小板的MPs上发现了特征性抗原CD41/CD61,验证了我们的技术。然而,对于源自其他细胞类型的MPs,尽管它们在产生MP的细胞上明显表达,但与文献中发表的一些数据相反,我们未能检测到任何抗原。使用乳胶珠技术,我们证实检测到了CD41、61。然而,其他抗原(在一些研究中已被视为阳性)的明显表达被确定为假阳性,阴性对照表明了这一点(对来自不同来源的MPs使用相同的标记)。
我们观察到,通过直接流式细胞术或乳胶珠流式细胞术,在相应的MPs上并不总是能检测到母细胞抗原。我们的数据强调,由于抗体的非特异性可能会产生假阳性结果,并且MPs表型特征的鉴定是一个困难的领域,需要使用多种阴性对照。