Hernandez-Giron I, Calzado A, Geleijns J, Joemai R M S, Veldkamp W J H
Unitat de Física Mèdica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Spain; Radiology Department, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), The Netherlands.
Departamento de Radiología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Spain.
Phys Med. 2015 Nov;31(7):798-807. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 May 13.
This paper studies low contrast detectability (LCD) performance of two model observers in CT phantom images acquired at different kVp levels and compares the results with humans in a 2-alternative forced choice experiment (2-AFC). Images of the Catphan phantom with objects of different contrasts (0.5 and 1%) and diameters (2-15 mm) were acquired in an Aquilion ONE 320-detector row CT (Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan), in two experiments, selecting (80-100-120-135 kV) with fixed mAs and varying the mAs to keep the dose constant, respectively. Four human observers evaluated the objects visibility obtaining a proportion correct (PC) for each case. LCD was also analyzed with two model observers (non-prewhitening matched filter with an eye filter, NPWE, and channelized Hotelling observer with Gabor channels, CHO). Object contrast was affected by kV, with differences up to 17% between the lowest and highest kV. Both models overestimated human performance and were corrected by efficiency and internal noise factors. The NPWE model reproduced better the human PC values trends showing Pearson's correlation coefficients ≥0.976 (0.954-0.987, 95% CI) for both experiments, whereas for CHO they were ≥0.706 (0.493-0.839). Bland-Altman plots showed better agreement between NPWE and humans being the average difference Δ and the range of the differences Δ±2σ (σ, standard deviation) of Δ=-0.3%, Δ±2σ = [-4.0%,4.5%]. For CHO, Δ=-1.2%, Δ± 2σ= [-10.7%,8.3%]. The NPWE model can be a useful tool to predict human performance in CT low contrast detection tasks in a standard phantom and be potentially used in protocol optimization based on kV selection.
本文研究了在不同千伏峰值(kVp)水平下获取的CT体模图像中两种模型观察者的低对比度可探测性(LCD)性能,并在二选一强制选择实验(2-AFC)中将结果与人类进行比较。在两台实验中,使用Aquilion ONE 320排探测器CT(日本东京东芝医疗系统公司)获取了具有不同对比度(0.5%和1%)和直径(2 - 15毫米)物体的Catphan体模图像,分别在固定毫安秒(mAs)的情况下选择(80 - 100 - 120 - 135 kV),并改变mAs以保持剂量恒定。四名人类观察者评估物体的可见性,为每种情况获得正确比例(PC)。还使用两种模型观察者(带眼滤波器的非预白化匹配滤波器,NPWE,以及带Gabor通道的通道化霍特林观察者,CHO)分析了LCD。物体对比度受kV影响,最低和最高kV之间的差异高达17%。两种模型都高估了人类的表现,并通过效率和内部噪声因素进行了校正。NPWE模型更好地再现了人类PC值趋势,两个实验的皮尔逊相关系数均≥0.976(0.954 - 0.987,95%置信区间),而对于CHO,相关系数≥0.706(0.493 - 0.839)。布兰德 - 奥特曼图显示NPWE与人类之间的一致性更好,平均差异Δ以及差异范围Δ±2σ(σ,标准差)分别为Δ = -0.3%,Δ±2σ = [-4.0%,4.5%]。对于CHO,Δ = -1.2% ,Δ±2σ = [-10.7%,8.3%] 。NPWE模型可以成为预测标准体模中CT低对比度检测任务中人类表现的有用工具,并有可能用于基于kV选择的协议优化。