Wessells Michael G
Columbia University, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 May;43:8-21. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.04.006.
Efforts to strengthen national child protection systems have frequently taken a top-down approach of imposing formal, government-managed services. Such expert-driven approaches are often characterized by low use of formal services and the misalignment of the nonformal and formal aspects of the child protection system. This article examines an alternative approach of community-driven, bottom-up work that enables nonformal-formal collaboration and alignment, greater use of formal services, internally driven social change, and high levels of community ownership. The dominant approach of reliance on expert-driven Child Welfare Committees produces low levels of community ownership. Using an approach developed and tested in rural Sierra Leone, community-driven action, including collaboration and linkages with the formal system, promoted the use of formal services and achieved increased ownership, effectiveness, and sustainability of the system. The field needs less reliance on expert-driven approaches and much wider use of slower, community-driven, bottom-up approaches to child protection.
加强国家儿童保护系统的努力常常采取自上而下的方式,即强制推行由政府管理的正规服务。这种由专家主导的方法往往存在正规服务利用率低以及儿童保护系统的非正规和正规方面不协调的问题。本文探讨了一种由社区驱动、自下而上的替代方法,这种方法能够实现非正规与正规的协作与协调,提高正规服务的利用率,推动内部驱动的社会变革,并增强社区的主人翁意识。依赖由专家主导的儿童福利委员会的主流方法导致社区主人翁意识淡薄。采用在塞拉利昂农村地区开发并经过测试的方法,社区驱动的行动,包括与正规系统的协作和联系,促进了正规服务的使用,并提高了该系统的主人翁意识、有效性和可持续性。该领域需要减少对专家主导方法的依赖,更广泛地采用较慢的、由社区驱动的、自下而上的儿童保护方法。