Mirelman Andrew J, Ballard Sarah Blythe, Saito Mayuko, Kosek Margaret N, Gilman Robert H
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, United Kingdom.
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Vaccine. 2015 Jun 17;33(27):3084-91. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 15.
With candidate norovirus (NV) vaccines in a rapid phase of development, assessment of the potential economic value of vaccine implementation will be necessary to aid health officials in vaccine implementation decisions. To date, no evaluations have been performed to evaluate the benefit of adopting NV vaccines for use in the childhood immunization programs of low- and middle-income countries.
We used a Markov decision model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding a two-dose NV vaccine to Peru's routine childhood immunization schedule using two recent estimates of NV incidence, one for a peri-urban region and one for a jungle region of the country.
Using the peri-urban NV incidence estimate, the annual cost of vaccination would be $13.0 million, offset by $2.6 million in treatment savings. Overall, this would result in 473 total DALYs averted; 526,245 diarrhea cases averted;153,735 outpatient visits averted; and 414 hospitalizations averted between birth and the fifth year of life. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio would be $21,415 per DALY averted; $19.86 per diarrhea case; $68.23 per outpatient visit; and $26,298 per hospitalization. Using the higher jungle NV incidence rates provided a lower cost per DALY of $10,135. The incremental cost per DALY with per-urban NV incidence is greater than three times the 2012 GDP per capita of Peru but the estimate drops below this threshold using the incidence from the jungle setting. In addition to the impact of incidence, sensitivity analysis showed that vaccine price and efficacy play a strong role in determining the level of cost-effectiveness.
The introduction of a NV vaccine would prevent many healthcare outcomes in the Peru and potentially be cost-effective in scenarios with high NV incidence. The vaccine cost-effectiveness model could also be applied to the evaluation of NV vaccine cost-effectiveness in other countries. In resource-poor settings, where NV incidence rates are expected to be higher.
随着候选诺如病毒(NV)疫苗进入快速研发阶段,评估疫苗实施的潜在经济价值对于协助卫生官员做出疫苗实施决策至关重要。迄今为止,尚未进行评估以评估在低收入和中等收入国家的儿童免疫规划中采用NV疫苗的益处。
我们使用马尔可夫决策模型,利用该国一个城郊地区和一个丛林地区最近的两项NV发病率估计值,评估在秘鲁的常规儿童免疫接种计划中添加两剂NV疫苗的成本效益。
使用城郊地区NV发病率估计值,疫苗接种的年度成本将为1300万美元,治疗节省费用为260万美元。总体而言,这将避免总计473个伤残调整生命年(DALYs);避免526,245例腹泻病例;避免153,735次门诊就诊;并在出生至五岁之间避免414次住院治疗。增量成本效益比为每避免一个DALY 21,415美元;每例腹泻病例19.86美元;每次门诊就诊68.23美元;每次住院26,298美元。使用较高的丛林地区NV发病率得出的每DALY成本较低,为10,135美元。城郊地区NV发病率的每DALY增量成本大于秘鲁2012年人均国内生产总值的三倍,但使用丛林地区发病率的估计值则低于该阈值。除了发病率的影响外,敏感性分析表明,疫苗价格和效力在确定成本效益水平方面起着重要作用。
引入NV疫苗将预防秘鲁的许多医疗保健后果,并且在NV发病率高的情况下可能具有成本效益。该疫苗成本效益模型也可应用于评估其他国家的NV疫苗成本效益。在资源匮乏地区,预计NV发病率会更高。