• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意力与记忆保护:回顾性注意线索与干扰之间的相互作用

Attention and memory protection: Interactions between retrospective attention cueing and interference.

作者信息

Makovski Tal, Pertzov Yoni

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , The College of Management Academic Studies , Rishon LeZion , Israel.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(9):1735-43. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1049623. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1080/17470218.2015.1049623
PMID:25980784
Abstract

Visual working memory (VWM) and attention have a number of features in common, but despite extensive research it is still unclear how the two interact. Can focused attention improve VWM precision? Can it protect VWM from interference? Here we used a partial-report, continuous-response orientation memory task to examine how attention and interference affect different aspects of VWM and how they interact with one another. Both attention and interference were orthogonally manipulated during the retention interval. Attention was manipulated by presenting informative retro-cues, whereas interference was manipulated by introducing a secondary interfering task. Mixture-model analyses revealed that retro-cues, compared to uninformative cues, improved all aspects of performance: Attention increased recall precision and decreased guessing rate and swap-errors (reporting a wrong item in memory). Similarly, performing a secondary task impaired all aspects of the VWM task. In particular, an interaction between retro-cue and secondary task interference was found primarily for swap-errors. Together these results suggest that both the quantity and quality of VWM representations are sensitive to attention cueing and interference modulations, and they highlight the role of attention in protecting the feature-location associations needed to access the correct items in memory.

摘要

视觉工作记忆(VWM)和注意力有许多共同特征,但尽管进行了广泛研究,两者如何相互作用仍不清楚。集中注意力能否提高VWM的精度?它能否保护VWM免受干扰?在这里,我们使用了一种部分报告、连续反应定向记忆任务,以研究注意力和干扰如何影响VWM的不同方面以及它们如何相互作用。在保持间隔期间,注意力和干扰都被正交操纵。通过呈现信息性的回溯线索来操纵注意力,而通过引入次要干扰任务来操纵干扰。混合模型分析表明,与无信息线索相比,回溯线索提高了所有方面的表现:注意力提高了回忆精度,降低了猜测率和交换错误(在记忆中报告错误的项目)。同样,执行次要任务会损害VWM任务的所有方面。特别是,主要在交换错误方面发现了回溯线索和次要任务干扰之间的相互作用。这些结果共同表明,VWM表征的数量和质量对注意力提示和干扰调制都很敏感,并且它们突出了注意力在保护访问记忆中正确项目所需的特征-位置关联方面的作用。

相似文献

1
Attention and memory protection: Interactions between retrospective attention cueing and interference.注意力与记忆保护:回顾性注意线索与干扰之间的相互作用
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(9):1735-43. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1049623. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
2
Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.从视觉工作记忆中获取更多:回溯线索增强检索并防止视觉干扰。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):890-910. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000192. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
3
Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.在工作记忆中操纵注意力焦点:对多个项目免受知觉干扰的保护的证据。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Jul;55(7):e13062. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13062. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
4
Retro-dimension-cue benefit in visual working memory.视空间工作记忆中的回溯维度提示获益。
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 24;6:35573. doi: 10.1038/srep35573.
5
The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.回溯线索的可靠性决定了未被提示的视觉工作记忆表征的命运。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1334-41. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0796-x.
6
Invalid retro-cues can eliminate the retro-cue benefit: Evidence for a hybridized account.无效的回溯线索可消除回溯线索效应:一种混合解释的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct;40(5):1748-54. doi: 10.1037/a0037474. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
7
Only pre-cueing but no retro-cueing effects emerge with masked arrow cues.对于掩蔽箭头线索,仅出现前线索效应,而无后线索效应。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 May;42:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
8
Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.概率性回溯提示并不决定视觉工作记忆中的状态。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):641-646. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1533-7.
9
Different effects of color-based and location-based selection on visual working memory.基于颜色和基于位置的选择对视觉工作记忆的不同影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Feb;77(2):450-63. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0775-3.
10
Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes.在视觉工作记忆中定向注意力可减少来自记忆探针的干扰。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Mar;34(2):369-80. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.369.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-Target Suppression Supports the Formation of Representational Prioritization Under High Working Memory Load.非目标抑制有助于在高工作记忆负荷下形成表征优先级。
Brain Sci. 2025 Jun 12;15(6):633. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15060633.
2
What are the benefits of directed attention within verbal working memory?言语工作记忆中的定向注意有哪些益处?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Feb;78(2):337-369. doi: 10.1177/17470218241299918. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
3
Multifaceted consequences of visual distraction during natural behaviour.自然行为中视觉分心的多方面后果。
Commun Psychol. 2024;2(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00099-0. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
A recurrent neural network model of prefrontal brain activity during a working memory task.前额叶脑活动在工作记忆任务中的递归神经网络模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Oct 18;19(10):e1011555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011555. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Bend but don't break: Prioritization protects working memory from displacement but leaves it vulnerable to distortion from distraction.弯曲但不折断:优先化保护工作记忆免受置换,但使其易受分心的扭曲。
Cognition. 2023 Oct;239:105574. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105574. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
6
Sustained attention required for effective dimension-based retro-cue benefit in visual working memory.有效基于维度的回溯提示在视觉工作记忆中获益需要持续注意。
J Vis. 2023 May 2;23(5):13. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.5.13.
7
Internal attention is the only retroactive mechanism for controlling precision in working memory.内部注意是控制工作记忆精度的唯一回溯机制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Jul;85(5):1375-1386. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02628-7. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
8
Prioritization sharpens working memories but does not protect them from distraction.优先化会增强工作记忆,但不能防止工作记忆受到干扰。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Apr;152(4):1158-1174. doi: 10.1037/xge0001309. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
9
Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory.注意和工作记忆受共同的神经机制控制。
J Neurosci. 2022 Sep 14;42(37):7110-7120. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0443-22.2022. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
10
Tracking Proactive Interference in Visual Memory.追踪视觉记忆中的前摄干扰。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 18;13:896866. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896866. eCollection 2022.