Romano Max J, Segal Jodi B, Pollack Craig Evan
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland2Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1148-54. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1340.
Both the overuse of unnecessary medical procedures and poor continuity of care are thought to contribute to high health care spending and poor patient outcomes.
To investigate the association between care continuity and use of potentially unnecessary procedures.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational retrospective cohort (n = 1,208,250 patients > 65 years) using 5% Medicare fee-for-service claims from 2008.
We evaluated continuity using the Bice-Boxerman continuity of care index. We measured overuse using a previously validated set of 19 potentially overused procedures.
Altogether, 14.7% of patients received at least 1 potentially overused procedure during the calendar year. For each 0.1 increase in the continuity score (0.4 SDs), patients had 0.93 times the odds of receiving overused procedures than those with lower scores (95% CI, 0.93-0.94). Higher continuity was significantly associated with lower odds of 9 procedures (Holm-Bonferroni corrected P < .02 was significant: 6 of 13 diagnostic tests [with ORs, 0.84-0.99; P < .001] and 3 therapeutic procedures [with ORs 0.81-0.87; P <.001]). Conversely, higher continuity was significantly associated with increased overuse for 3 procedures (1 diagnostic test [OR, 1.06; P < .001], 1 of 2 screening tests [OR, 1.05; P < .001], and the single monitoring test [OR, 1.03; P < .01]).
Increased continuity was associated with an overall decrease in overuse, suggesting a potential benefit of high-continuity care; however, the strength and direction of the association varied according to the specific procedure.
不必要医疗程序的过度使用和护理连续性差均被认为会导致高医疗支出和患者不良预后。
调查护理连续性与潜在不必要程序使用之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:采用2008年5%医疗保险按服务付费索赔数据的观察性回顾性队列研究(n = 1,208,250名65岁以上患者)。
我们使用比塞-博克斯曼护理连续性指数评估连续性。我们使用一组先前验证的19种潜在过度使用的程序来衡量过度使用情况。
在这一年中,共有14.7%的患者接受了至少1种潜在过度使用的程序。连续性得分每增加0.1(0.4个标准差),患者接受过度使用程序的几率是得分较低患者的0.93倍(95%置信区间,0.93 - 0.94)。更高的连续性与9种程序的较低几率显著相关(经霍尔姆-邦费罗尼校正,P <.02具有显著性:13种诊断测试中的6种[比值比,0.84 - 0.99;P <.001]和3种治疗程序[比值比,0.81 - 0.87;P <.001])。相反,更高的连续性与3种程序的过度使用增加显著相关(1种诊断测试[比值比,1.06;P <.001],2种筛查测试中的1种[比值比,1.05;P <.001],以及单一监测测试[比值比,1.03;P <.01])。
连续性增加与过度使用总体减少相关,表明高连续性护理可能有益;然而,关联的强度和方向因具体程序而异。