• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非agenarians急性心肌梗死患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果 (注:“nonagenarians”可能拼写有误,推测可能是“nonagenarians”,意为“九旬老人” )

Outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary interventions in nonagenarians with acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Helft Gérard, Georges Jean-Louis, Mouranche Xavier, Loyeau Aurélie, Spaulding Christian, Caussin Christophe, Benamer Hakim, Garot Philippe, Livarek Bernard, Teiger Emmanuel, Varenne Olivier, Monségu Jacques, Mapouata Mireille, Petroni Thibaut, Hammoudi Nadjib, Lambert Yves, Dupas François, Laborne François, Lapostolle Frederic, Lefort Hugues, Juliard Jean-Michel, Letarnec Jean-Yves, Lamhaut Lionel, Lebail Gaëlle, Boche Thévy, Jouven Xavier, Bataille Sophie

机构信息

Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Cardiology Department, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, ICAN, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France; Pierre et Marie-Curie University, Paris, France.

Versailles Hospital, Cardiology Department, Le Chesnay, France.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2015 Aug 1;192:24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.227. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.227
PMID:25985011
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few data are available on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in nonagenarians. In a large prospective registry on pPCI for STEMI we compared the demographics, procedural and in-hospital outcomes between nonagenarians (age ≥ 90 years) and patients aged < 90 years.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 26,157 consecutive patients with pPCI in the Greater Paris Area region between 2003 and 2011. Of these, 418 (1.6%) were ≥ 90 years old. Nonagenarians (versus patients < 90 years) were more likely to be female (62.3% versus 22.5%, p < 0.0001), nonsmokers (81.6% versus 36.7%, p < 0.0001), in cardiogenic shock (Killip IV) upon admission (10.5% versus 4.8%, p < 0.001), and had significant co-morbidities. Over two-thirds of patients underwent procedures via the radial artery (61% versus 72.1%, p = 0.007). Both groups had high and similar angiographic success rates (98.1% versus 98.7%, p = 0.33). Drug-eluting stents were used less often in nonagenarians (4.4% versus 16.7%, p < 0.0001). Hospital mortality was significantly much higher in patients over 90 years old (24.9% versus 5.1%, p < 0.001) in univariate analysis. After adjustment for sex, cardiogenic shock, diabetes, triple vessel disease, drug-eluting stent use and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors use, mortality remains higher in nonagenarian patients (OR: 4.31; 95% CI: 3.26-5.71, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world setting, we found important demographic differences in nonagenarian compared to younger patients. Despite achieving a high rate of reperfusion with pPCI using mainly radial access, similar to that achieved in younger patients, hospital mortality was higher in nonagenarians.

摘要

背景

关于非agenarians(90岁及以上)进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)的数据很少。在一项关于STEMI患者pPCI的大型前瞻性注册研究中,我们比较了90岁及以上患者(年龄≥90岁)与年龄<90岁患者的人口统计学特征、手术及住院结局。

方法与结果

我们纳入了2003年至2011年间大巴黎地区连续接受pPCI的26,157例患者。其中,418例(1.6%)年龄≥90岁。90岁及以上患者(与<90岁患者相比)更可能为女性(62.3%对22.5%,p<0.0001)、非吸烟者(81.6%对36.7%,p<0.0001)、入院时处于心源性休克(Killip IV级)(10.5%对4.8%,p<0.001),且有显著的合并症。超过三分之二的患者通过桡动脉进行手术(61%对72.1%,p = 0.007)。两组的血管造影成功率都很高且相似(98.1%对98.7%,p = 0.33)。90岁及以上患者使用药物洗脱支架的频率较低(4.4%对16.7%,p<0.0001)。单因素分析显示,90岁以上患者的医院死亡率显著更高(24.9%对5.1%,p<0.001)。在对性别、心源性休克、糖尿病、三支血管病变、药物洗脱支架使用和糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂使用进行调整后,90岁及以上患者的死亡率仍然较高(OR:4.31;95%CI:3.26 - 5.71,p<0.0001)。

结论

在实际临床环境中,我们发现90岁及以上患者与年轻患者在人口统计学特征上存在重要差异。尽管通过主要经桡动脉途径进行pPCI实现了与年轻患者相似的高再灌注率,但90岁及以上患者的医院死亡率更高。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary interventions in nonagenarians with acute myocardial infarction.非agenarians急性心肌梗死患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结果 (注:“nonagenarians”可能拼写有误,推测可能是“nonagenarians”,意为“九旬老人” )
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Aug 1;192:24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.227. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
2
Outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians and nonagenarians with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: from the Western Denmark heart registry.在丹麦西部心脏注册研究中,观察高龄(80 岁及以上)和超高龄(90 岁及以上)ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的预后。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 May;81(6):912-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24591. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
3
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarians: six-month outcomes from a single-center registry.非agenarians的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:单中心注册研究的六个月结果。 注:这里“nonagenarians”可能有误,推测可能是“nonagenarian”(九十多岁的人),如果是这样,译文为:九十多岁老人的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:单中心注册研究的六个月结果。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2013 May;25(5):242-5.
4
Direct stenting is an independent predictor of improved survival in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction.直接支架置入术是接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者生存率提高的独立预测因素。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014 Dec;3(4):340-6. doi: 10.1177/2048872614530864. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
5
Should patients in cardiogenic shock undergo rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis: comparison of primary versus rescue angioplasty in cardiogenic shock patients.心源性休克患者在溶栓治疗失败后是否应接受补救性血管成形术:心源性休克患者直接血管成形术与补救性血管成形术的比较
J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 May;19(5):217-23.
6
Outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main-related ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.非保护左主干相关ST段抬高型心肌梗死的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的结果
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2015 Mar;16(3):163-9. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000075.
7
Absence of gender disparity in short-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing sirolimus-eluting stent based primary coronary intervention: a report from Shanghai Acute Coronary Event (SACE) Registry.在接受依维莫司洗脱支架的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,短期临床结局无性别差异:上海急性冠状动脉事件(SACE)登记研究的报告。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Apr 5;123(7):782-8.
8
Procedural and in-patient outcomes in patients aged 80 years or older undergoing contemporary primary percutaneous coronary intervention.80 岁及以上患者行当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的操作程序和住院结果。
EuroIntervention. 2012 Dec 20;8(8):912-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I8A140.
9
Comparison of in-hospital outcomes with low-dose fibrinolytic therapy followed by urgent percutaneous coronary intervention versus percutaneous coronary intervention alone for treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.比较低剂量溶栓治疗后紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与单纯经皮冠状动脉介入治疗治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的住院结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jun 1;111(11):1576-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.01.326. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
10
Long-term outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated with culprit-only, immediate, or staged multivessel percutaneous revascularization strategies: Insights from the REAL registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者采用仅处理罪犯血管、即刻或分期多支血管经皮血管重建策略的长期预后:来自REAL注册研究的见解
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15;84(6):912-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25374. Epub 2014 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety of Leadless Pacemaker Insertion in Nonagenarians.百岁老人植入无导线起搏器的安全性。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2025 May 15;16(5):6272-6277. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2025.16053. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Implementation of the ESC STEMI guidelines in female and elderly patients over a 20-year period in a large German registry.在一项大型德国注册研究中,20 年来实施 ESC STEMI 指南在女性和老年患者中的应用。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Sep;112(9):1240-1251. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02165-9. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
3
Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients aged 80 years old and above: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
80岁及以上患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
AsiaIntervention. 2022 Oct 6;8(2):123-131. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-21-00040. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Outcomes of Nonagenarians with Acute Myocardial Infarction with or without Coronary Intervention.九旬老人急性心肌梗死接受或未接受冠状动脉介入治疗的结局
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 14;11(6):1593. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061593.
5
Primary PCI in a nonagenarian: an uncommon predicament.一位九旬老人的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一种罕见的困境。
BMJ Case Rep. 2020 Dec 15;13(12):e237650. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-237650.
6
Managing Nonagenarians with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Invasive versus Conservative Treatment.管理患有急性心肌梗死的九旬老人:侵入性治疗与保守治疗
Cardiol Res Pract. 2020 Nov 10;2020:8885518. doi: 10.1155/2020/8885518. eCollection 2020.
7
Atorvastatin combined with routine therapy on HIF-1, VEGF concentration and cardiac function in rats with acute myocardial infarction.阿托伐他汀联合常规治疗对急性心肌梗死大鼠缺氧诱导因子-1、血管内皮生长因子浓度及心功能的影响
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Mar;19(3):2053-2058. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8438. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
8
Poor long-term outcome in acute coronary syndrome in a real-life setting: Ten-year outcome of the TACOS study.真实环境下急性冠状动脉综合征的不良长期预后:TACOS 研究十年结果。
Cardiol J. 2021;28(2):302-311. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0037. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
9
Elderly Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Patient-Centered Approach.老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者:以患者为中心的治疗方法。
Drugs Aging. 2019 Jun;36(6):531-539. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00663-y.
10
Comparison of Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Elderly Patients, Including 10 628 Nonagenarians: Insights From a Japanese Nationwide Registry (J-PCI Registry).比较老年患者(包括 10628 名 90 岁以上老人)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果:来自日本全国注册登记研究(J-PCI 注册登记研究)的分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Mar 5;8(5):e011183. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011017.