• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项大型德国注册研究中,20 年来实施 ESC STEMI 指南在女性和老年患者中的应用。

Implementation of the ESC STEMI guidelines in female and elderly patients over a 20-year period in a large German registry.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.

Berlin-Brandenburger Herzinfarktregister, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Sep;112(9):1240-1251. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02165-9. Epub 2023 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00392-023-02165-9
PMID:36764933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10449958/
Abstract

AIMS

We investigated the implementation of new guidelines in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in a large real-world patient population in the metropolitan area of Berlin (Germany) over a 20-year period.

METHODS

From January 2000 to December 2019, a total of 25 792 patients were admitted with STEMI to one of the 34 member hospitals of the Berlin-Brandenburg Myocardial Infarction Registry (B2HIR) and were stratified for sex and age < 75 and ≥ 75 years.

RESULTS

The median age of women was 72 years (IQR 61-81) compared to 61 years in men (IQR 51-71). PCI treatment as a standard of care was implemented in men earlier than in women across all age groups. It took two years from the 2017 class IA ESC STEMI guideline recommendation to prefer the radial access route rather than femoral until > 60% of patients were treated accordingly. In 2019, less than 60% of elderly women were treated via a radial access. While the majority of patients < 75 years already received ticagrelor or prasugrel as antiplatelet agent in the year of the class IA ESC STEMI guideline recommendation in 2012, men ≥ 75 years lagged two years and women ≥ 75 three years behind. Amongst the elderly, in-hospital mortality was 22.6% (737) for women and 17.3% (523) for men (p < 0.001). In patients < 75 years fatal outcome was less likely with 7.2% (305) in women and 5.8% (833) in men (p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding variables, female sex was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients ≥ 75 years (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.12-1.68, p = 0.002), but not in patients < 75 years (p = 0.076).

CONCLUSION

In-hospital mortality differs considerably by age and sex and remains highest in elderly patients and in particular in elderly females. In these patient groups, guideline recommended therapies were implemented with a significant delay.

摘要

目的

我们研究了在柏林大都市地区(德国)的 20 年间,新指南在大量真实世界的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中的实施情况。

方法

从 2000 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月,共有 25792 例 STEMI 患者被收入柏林-勃兰登堡心肌梗死登记处(B2HIR)的 34 个成员医院之一,并按性别和年龄<75 岁和≥75 岁进行分层。

结果

女性的中位年龄为 72 岁(IQR 61-81),而男性为 61 岁(IQR 51-71)。在所有年龄段,男性接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)作为标准治疗的时间早于女性。从 2017 年 ESC STEMI 类 IA 指南建议首选桡动脉入路而非股动脉入路,到有超过 60%的患者接受相应治疗,这一过程耗时两年。2019 年,不到 60%的老年女性接受桡动脉入路治疗。尽管 2012 年 ESC STEMI 类 IA 指南建议使用替格瑞洛或普拉格雷作为抗血小板药物,但大多数<75 岁的患者已经接受了这两种药物,而≥75 岁的男性和≥75 岁的女性则分别滞后了两年和三年。在老年人中,女性的院内死亡率为 22.6%(737 例),男性为 17.3%(523 例)(p<0.001)。在<75 岁的患者中,女性的致命结局可能性更小,为 7.2%(305 例),男性为 5.8%(833 例)(p<0.001)。在调整混杂变量后,女性是≥75 岁患者院内死亡的独立预测因素(OR 1.37,95%CI 1.12-1.68,p=0.002),但在<75 岁患者中则不然(p=0.076)。

结论

院内死亡率在年龄和性别上有显著差异,在老年患者中尤其是老年女性中最高。在这些患者群体中,指南推荐的治疗方法实施存在显著延迟。

相似文献

1
Implementation of the ESC STEMI guidelines in female and elderly patients over a 20-year period in a large German registry.在一项大型德国注册研究中,20 年来实施 ESC STEMI 指南在女性和老年患者中的应用。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Sep;112(9):1240-1251. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02165-9. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
2
Survival benefit from recent changes in management of men and women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高心肌梗死患者管理的近期变化带来的生存获益。
Cardiol J. 2019;26(5):459-468. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0057. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
3
[Evidence-based management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Latest guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2010].[ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的循证管理。欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)2010年最新指南]
Herz. 2010 Dec;35(8):558-64. doi: 10.1007/s00059-010-3401-8.
4
Physician and Hospital Utilization of P2Y12 Inhibitors in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States: A Study From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry's Research to Practice Initiative.美国ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中P2Y12抑制剂的医生及医院使用情况:一项来自国家心血管数据注册中心“研究到实践”倡议的研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Mar;13(3):e006275. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006275. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor in Comparison to Clopidogrel in Elderly Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarctions.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的疗效和安全性比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Sep 17;8(18):e012530. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012530. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
6
Management and predictors of outcome in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Bremen STEMI Registry.未选择患者的心源性休克合并急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的管理和预后预测因素:不来梅 STEMI 注册研究结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 May;107(5):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1192-0. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
7
Sex disparities in guideline-recommended therapies and outcomes after ST-elevation myocardial infarction in a contemporary nationwide cohort of patients over an eight-year period.在一个长达八年的当代全国范围内的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者队列中,性别差异对指南推荐治疗方法和结局的影响。
Atherosclerosis. 2023 Jun;375:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023.05.007. Epub 2023 May 11.
8
Safety and Efficacy in Prasugrel- Versus Ticagrelor-Treated Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.替格瑞洛与普拉格雷治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的安全性和疗效。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;72(4):186-190. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000609.
9
Mortality in STEMI patients without standard modifiable risk factors: a sex-disaggregated analysis of SWEDEHEART registry data.非标准可调节风险因素的 STEMI 患者的死亡率:SWEDEHEART 注册研究数据的性别细分分析。
Lancet. 2021 Mar 20;397(10279):1085-1094. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00272-5. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
10
Current characteristics and management of ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the Tokyo metropolitan area: from the Tokyo CCU network registered cohort.东京都地区ST段抬高型和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的当前特征与管理:来自东京CCU网络注册队列研究
Heart Vessels. 2016 Nov;31(11):1740-1751. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0791-9. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender-based differences among ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients in Egypt: secondary analysis from the ACCA-EAPCI ESC-STEMI registry.埃及ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的性别差异:来自ACCA-EAPCI ESC-STEMI注册研究的二次分析
Egypt Heart J. 2025 Aug 4;77(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s43044-025-00671-x.
2
STEMI-OP in-hospital mortality prediction algorithms: Frailty-integrated machine learning in older patients undergoing primary PCI.ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者院内死亡预测算法:老年患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时整合衰弱因素的机器学习方法
NPJ Aging. 2025 Jun 6;11(1):48. doi: 10.1038/s41514-025-00238-9.
3
Implications of intrinsic capacity subtypes for post-PCI patients older than 45.

本文引用的文献

1
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会冠状动脉血运重建指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-e114. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
2
The learning curve of the distal radial access for coronary intervention.经桡动脉入路行冠状动脉介入治疗的学习曲线。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 24;11(1):13217. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92742-7.
3
The mortality rates in registries of patients with STEMI are highly affected by inclusion criteria and population characteristics.
固有能力亚型对45岁以上经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 5;15(1):11728. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94485-1.
4
Frailty as an independent predictor for midterm adverse outcomes in the elderly undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A longitudinal cohort study.衰弱作为接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年患者中期不良结局的独立预测因素:一项纵向队列研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb;105(2):335-344. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31251. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
5
Sex-specific structural and functional cardiac remodeling during healthy aging assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.通过心血管磁共振评估健康衰老过程中性别特异性的心脏结构和功能重塑。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Mar 11. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02430-5.
STMI 患者注册研究的死亡率受到纳入标准和人群特征的高度影响。
Acta Cardiol. 2021 Jul;76(5):504-512. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1848970. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
4
Revascularization Versus Medical Therapy in Patients Aged 80 Years and Older with Acute Myocardial Infarction.80 岁及以上急性心肌梗死患者的血运重建与药物治疗。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Nov;68(11):2525-2533. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16747. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
5
Changes in treatment for NSTEMI in women and the elderly over the past 16 years in a large real-world population.过去16年中,大型真实世界人群中女性和老年人非ST段抬高型心肌梗死治疗的变化。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 1;316:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
6
Temporal Trends Analysis of the Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Women With Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS): ACS Israeli Survey Registry 2000-2016.急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)女性患者特征、治疗及结局的时间趋势分析:ACS 以色列登记研究 2000-2016 年。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jan 7;9(1):e014721. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014721. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
7
Association of Sex With Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subgroup Analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的性别与结局的相关性:GLOBAL LEADERS 随机临床试验的亚组分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jan 1;5(1):21-29. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4296.
8
Sex Differences Persist in Time to Presentation, Revascularization, and Mortality in Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.性别差异在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗心肌梗死患者的就诊时间、血运重建和死亡率方面仍然存在。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 21;8(10):e012161. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012161.
9
Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 14;40(3):237-269. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462.
10
Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (MATRIX): final 1-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉入路与股动脉入路和比伐卢定与普通肝素的比较(MATRIX):一项多中心、随机对照试验的最终 1 年结果。
Lancet. 2018 Sep 8;392(10150):835-848. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31714-8. Epub 2018 Aug 25.