Reddy Ashok, Pollack Craig E, Asch David A, Canamucio Anne, Werner Rachel M
VISN 4 Center for Evaluation of PACT, Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania2Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia3Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelp.
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1157-62. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1853.
Primary care provider (PCP) turnover is common and can disrupt patient continuity of care. Little is known about the effect of PCP turnover on patient care experience and quality of care.
To measure the effect of PCP turnover on patient experiences of care and ambulatory care quality.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational, retrospective cohort study of a nationwide sample of primary care patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). We included all patients enrolled in primary care at the VHA between 2010 and 2012 included in 1 of 2 national data sets used to measure our outcome variables: 326,374 patients in the Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP; used to measure patient experience of care) associated with 8441 PCPs and 184,501 patients in the External Peer Review Program (EPRP; used to measure ambulatory care quality) associated with 6973 PCPs.
Whether a patient experienced PCP turnover, defined as a patient whose provider (physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) had left the VHA (ie, had no patient encounters for 12 months).
Five patient care experience measures (from SHEP) and 11 measures of quality of ambulatory care (from EPRP).
Nine percent of patients experienced a PCP turnover in our study sample. Primary care provider turnover was associated with a worse rating in each domain of patient care experience. Turnover was associated with a reduced likelihood of having a positive rating of their personal physician of 68.2% vs 74.6% (adjusted percentage point difference, -5.3; 95% CI, -6.0 to -4.7) and a reduced likelihood of getting care quickly of 36.5% vs 38.5% (adjusted percentage point difference, -1.1; 95% CI, -2.1 to -0.1). In contrast, PCP turnover was not associated with lower quality of ambulatory care except for a lower likelihood of controlling blood pressure of 78.7% vs 80.4% (adjusted percentage point difference, -1.44; 95% CI, -2.2 to -0.7). In 9 measures of ambulatory care quality, the difference between patients who experienced no PCP turnover and those who had a PCP turnover was less than 1 percentage point. These effects were moderated by the patients' continuity with their PCP prior to turnover, with a larger detrimental effect of PCP turnover among those with higher continuity prior to the turnover.
Primary care provider turnover was associated with worse patient experiences of care but did not have a major effect on ambulatory care quality.
基层医疗服务提供者(PCP)的更替很常见,可能会扰乱患者的连续护理。关于PCP更替对患者护理体验和护理质量的影响,人们了解甚少。
评估PCP更替对患者护理体验和门诊护理质量的影响。
设计、设置和参与者:对退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)全国范围内基层医疗患者样本进行的观察性回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了2010年至2012年期间在VHA接受基层医疗服务的所有患者,这些患者包含在用于测量我们的结局变量的2个全国数据集中的1个:患者医疗体验调查(SHEP;用于测量患者护理体验)中的326,374名患者与8441名PCP相关,以及外部同行评审项目(EPRP;用于测量门诊护理质量)中的184,501名患者与6973名PCP相关。
患者是否经历了PCP更替,定义为其提供者(医生、执业护士或医师助理)已离开VHA的患者(即连续12个月没有患者诊疗记录)。
五项患者护理体验指标(来自SHEP)和十一项门诊护理质量指标(来自EPRP)。
在我们的研究样本中,9%的患者经历了PCP更替。基层医疗服务提供者的更替与患者护理体验的每个领域的较差评分相关。更替与对其私人医生给予正面评价的可能性降低相关,分别为68.2%对74.6%(调整后的百分点差异为-5.3;95%置信区间为-6.0至-4.7),以及快速获得护理的可能性降低相关,分别为36.5%对38.5%(调整后的百分点差异为-1.1;95%置信区间为-2.1至-0.1)。相比之下,PCP更替与门诊护理质量较低无关,除了控制血压的可能性较低,分别为78.7%对80.4%(调整后的百分点差异为-1.44;95%置信区间为-2.2至-0.7)。在十一项门诊护理质量指标中,未经历PCP更替的患者与经历了PCP更替的患者之间的差异小于1个百分点。这些影响因患者在更替前与PCP的连续性而有所缓和,在更替前连续性较高的患者中,PCP更替的有害影响更大。
基层医疗服务提供者的更替与较差的患者护理体验相关,但对门诊护理质量没有重大影响。