• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振成像对低风险前列腺癌主动监测候选者疾病重新分类的诊断性荟萃分析

Magnetic resonance imaging on disease reclassification among active surveillance candidates with low-risk prostate cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis.

作者信息

Guo R, Cai L, Fan Y, Jin J, Zhou L, Zhang K

机构信息

Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital and Institute of Urology, National Research Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015 Sep;18(3):221-8. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2015.20. Epub 2015 May 19.

DOI:10.1038/pcan.2015.20
PMID:25986915
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Active surveillance (AS) is an increasingly important attempt to avoid overtreatment of patients who harbor clinically insignificant disease while offering curative treatment to those in whom disease is reclassified as higher risk after an observation period and repeat biopsy. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting upgrading on confirmatory biopsy in men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) on AS.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed for pertinent studies up to November 2014. We used standard methods recommended for meta-analyses of diagnostic test evaluations. The analysis was based on a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Meta-regression analysis was used to assess the effects of some confounding factors on the results of the meta-analysis. The potential presence of publication bias was tested using the Deeks' funnel plots.

RESULTS

Seven studies provided the diagnostic data on MRI and AS of PCa, comprising 1028 patients. The pooled estimates of MRI on disease reclassification among AS candidates were as follows: sensitivity, 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.44-0.86); specificity, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.53-0.91); positive likelihood ratio, 3.1 (95% CI, 1.6-6.0); negative likelihood ratio, 0.40 (95% CI, 0.23-0.70); and diagnostic odds ratio, 8 (95% CI, 4-16). The P-value for heterogeneity was <0.001. We found that the SROC curve is positioned toward the desirable upper left corner of the curve, and the area under the curve was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83). For a pretest probability of 0.20, the corresponding positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.44 and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 0.91. MRI may reveal an unrecognized significant lesion in 33.27% of patients, and biopsy of these areas reclassified 14.59% of cases as no longer fulfilling the criteria for AS. In addition, when no suspicious disease progression (66.34%) was identified on MRI, the chance of reclassification on repeat biopsy was extremely low at 6.13%.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI, especially multiparametric (MP)-MRI, has a moderate diagnostic accuracy as a significant predictor of disease reclassification among AS candidates. The high NPV and specificity for the prediction of biopsy reclassification upon clinical follow-up suggest that negative prostate MRI findings may support a patient remaining under AS. Although the PPV and sensitivity for the prediction were relatively low, the presence of a suspicious lesion >10 mm lesion may suggest an increased risk for disease progression.

摘要

背景

主动监测(AS)是一项日益重要的尝试,旨在避免对患有临床意义不显著疾病的患者进行过度治疗,同时为那些在观察期和重复活检后疾病被重新分类为高风险的患者提供根治性治疗。我们旨在评估磁共振成像(MRI)在预测接受AS的低风险前列腺癌(PCa)男性患者确诊活检时疾病升级方面的诊断性能。

方法

我们检索了截至2014年11月的PubMed上的相关研究。我们使用了推荐用于诊断试验评估的荟萃分析的标准方法。分析基于汇总的受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线。荟萃回归分析用于评估一些混杂因素对荟萃分析结果的影响。使用Deeks漏斗图检验潜在的发表偏倚。

结果

七项研究提供了关于PCa的MRI和AS的诊断数据,包括1028例患者。MRI对AS候选者疾病重新分类的汇总估计如下:敏感性为0.69(95%置信区间(CI),0.44 - 0.86);特异性为0.78(95%CI,0.53 - 0.91);阳性似然比为3.1(95%CI,1.6 - 6.0);阴性似然比为0.40(95%CI,0.23 - 0.70);诊断比值比为8(95%CI,4 - 16)。异质性的P值<0.001。我们发现SROC曲线位于曲线理想的左上角,曲线下面积为0.79(95%CI, 0.76 - 0.83)。对于0.20的验前概率,相应的阳性预测值(PPV)为0.44,阴性预测值(NPV)为0.91。MRI可能在33.27%的患者中发现未被识别的显著病变,对这些区域进行活检后,14.59%的病例被重新分类为不再符合AS标准。此外,当MRI未发现可疑疾病进展(66.34%)时,重复活检时重新分类的可能性极低,为6.13%。

结论

MRI,尤其是多参数(MP)-MRI,作为AS候选者中疾病重新分类的重要预测指标,具有中等诊断准确性。对临床随访时活检重新分类预测的高NPV和特异性表明,前列腺MRI阴性结果可能支持患者继续接受AS。尽管预测的PPV和敏感性相对较低,但存在>10毫米的可疑病变可能提示疾病进展风险增加。

相似文献

1
Magnetic resonance imaging on disease reclassification among active surveillance candidates with low-risk prostate cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis.磁共振成像对低风险前列腺癌主动监测候选者疾病重新分类的诊断性荟萃分析
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015 Sep;18(3):221-8. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2015.20. Epub 2015 May 19.
2
The role of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score in Gleason 3 + 3 active surveillance candidates enrollment: a diagnostic meta-analysis.前列腺影像报告和数据系统评分在 Gleason 3+3 主动监测候选者入组中的作用:一项诊断性荟萃分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 May;22(2):235-243. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0111-4. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
3
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging outperforms the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer.在预测临床显著性前列腺癌方面,多参数磁共振成像比前列腺癌预防试验风险计算器表现更优。
Cancer. 2014 Sep 15;120(18):2876-82. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28790. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
4
Impact of multiparametric endorectal coil prostate magnetic resonance imaging on disease reclassification among active surveillance candidates: a prospective cohort study.多参数直肠内线圈前列腺磁共振成像对主动监测候选者疾病再分类的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Urol. 2012 Apr;187(4):1247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.112. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
5
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging characterization of prostate lesions in the active surveillance population: incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of disease reclassification.主动监测人群中前列腺病变的多参数磁共振成像特征:磁共振成像对疾病重新分类预测的增量价值
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013 Nov-Dec;37(6):948-56. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31829ae20a.
6
Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in confirming eligibility for active surveillance for men with prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像在确认前列腺癌男性进行主动监测的适宜性方面的准确性。
Cancer. 2013 Sep 15;119(18):3359-66. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28216. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
7
Reliability of Serial Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Prostate Cancer Progression During Active Surveillance: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.基于前列腺 MRI 影像学表现预测前列腺癌主动监测中进展的可靠性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2021 Nov;80(5):549-563. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 19.
8
In patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy and a suspicious lesion on magnetic resonance imaging, is a 12-core biopsy still necessary in addition to a targeted biopsy?对于既往前列腺活检结果为阴性但磁共振成像显示有可疑病变的患者,除了靶向活检外,是否仍需要进行12针活检?
BJU Int. 2015 Apr;115(4):562-70. doi: 10.1111/bju.12938.
9
Value of 3-T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-guided biopsy for early risk restratification in active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study.3-T 多参数磁共振成像和磁共振引导活检在低危前列腺癌主动监测中早期风险再分层的价值:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Invest Radiol. 2014 Mar;49(3):165-72. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000008.
10
Magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review.磁共振成像在前列腺癌主动监测中的应用:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):627-36. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.050. Epub 2014 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
[Active surveillance of prostate cancer].[前列腺癌的主动监测]
Urologie. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1007/s00120-025-02555-z.
2
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Study in Multiparametric Examination of the Prostate-Can We Make Better Use of It?动态对比增强研究在前列腺多参数检查中的应用——我们能否更好地利用它?
Tomography. 2022 Jun 9;8(3):1509-1521. doi: 10.3390/tomography8030124.
3
Diagnostic Accuracy of Contemporary Selection Criteria in Prostate Cancer Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.当代前列腺癌患者主动监测选择标准的诊断准确性:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析

本文引用的文献

1
Performance comparison of 1.5-T endorectal coil MRI with 3.0-T nonendorectal coil MRI in patients with prostate cancer.1.5-T 直肠内线圈磁共振成像与3.0-T 非直肠内线圈磁共振成像在前列腺癌患者中的性能比较
Acad Radiol. 2015 Apr;22(4):467-74. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.11.007. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
2
A prospective comparison of MRI-US fused targeted biopsy versus systematic ultrasound-guided biopsy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients on active surveillance.磁共振成像-超声融合靶向活检与系统超声引导活检在主动监测患者中检测临床显著性前列腺癌的前瞻性比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jan;41(1):220-5. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24710. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
3
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;11:810736. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.810736. eCollection 2021.
4
Current Role of Multiparametric MRI and MRI Targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Germany: A Nationwide Survey.当前多参数 MRI 和 MRI 靶向活检在德国前列腺癌诊断中的作用:一项全国性调查。
Urol Int. 2020;104(9-10):731-740. doi: 10.1159/000508755. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of CK-19, Galectin-3 and HBME-1 on papillary thyroid carcinoma: a meta-analysis.CK-19、半乳糖凝集素-3和HBME-1对甲状腺乳头状癌的诊断准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017 Aug 1;10(8):8130-8140. eCollection 2017.
6
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided targeted biopsy in risk classification among patients on active surveillance: A diagnostic meta-analysis.磁共振成像引导下的靶向活检在接受主动监测患者风险分类中的应用:一项诊断性荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(26):e16122. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016122.
7
Entering an era of radiogenomics in prostate cancer risk stratification.前列腺癌风险分层进入放射基因组学时代。
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Sep;7(Suppl 4):S443-S452. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.07.04.
8
Indications for and transitioning to secondary treatment while on active surveillance for prostate cancer.前列腺癌积极监测期间二线治疗的指征及转换时机
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Apr;7(2):236-242. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.02.08.
9
Imaging for the selection and monitoring of men on active surveillance for prostate cancer.用于前列腺癌主动监测男性患者的选择和监测的影像学检查。
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Apr;7(2):228-235. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.08.13.
10
Repeat multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.对接受主动监测的前列腺癌患者重复进行多参数磁共振成像检查。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 27;12(12):e0189272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189272. eCollection 2017.
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging characterization of prostate lesions in the active surveillance population: incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of disease reclassification.
主动监测人群中前列腺病变的多参数磁共振成像特征:磁共振成像对疾病重新分类预测的增量价值
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013 Nov-Dec;37(6):948-56. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31829ae20a.
4
Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in confirming eligibility for active surveillance for men with prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像在确认前列腺癌男性进行主动监测的适宜性方面的准确性。
Cancer. 2013 Sep 15;119(18):3359-66. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28216. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
5
Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy.与系统性经直肠超声12针穿刺活检相比,磁共振成像/超声融合活检能显著提升前列腺癌的诊断水平。
Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):713-719. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.059. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
6
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings in men with low-risk prostate cancer followed using active surveillance.低危前列腺癌患者采用主动监测后的多参数磁共振成像表现。
BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(7):1037-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11641.x. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
7
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance one year after diagnosis and before repeat biopsy.前列腺癌患者在诊断后一年且在重复活检前进行主动监测时的扩散加权磁共振成像。
Scand J Urol. 2013 Dec;47(6):456-61. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.765910. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
8
Magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of clinically low risk prostate cancer.磁共振成像预测拟行主动监测的临床低危前列腺癌患者前列腺活检结果。
J Urol. 2012 Nov;188(5):1732-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.024. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
9
The Gordian knot of interim 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for Hodgkin lymphoma: a meta-analysis and commentary on published studies.霍奇金淋巴瘤中 18 氟-脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描的戈耳迪之结:对已发表研究的荟萃分析和评论。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2012 Nov;53(11):2166-74. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2012.685730. Epub 2012 May 22.
10
Impact of multiparametric endorectal coil prostate magnetic resonance imaging on disease reclassification among active surveillance candidates: a prospective cohort study.多参数直肠内线圈前列腺磁共振成像对主动监测候选者疾病再分类的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Urol. 2012 Apr;187(4):1247-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.112. Epub 2012 Feb 14.