Shih Ya-Chen Tina, Smieliauskas Fabrice, Geynisman Daniel M, Kelly Ronan J, Smith Thomas J
Ya-Chen Tina Shih, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Fabrice Smieliauskas, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Daniel M. Geynisman, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Ronan J. Kelly and Thomas J. Smith, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 1;33(19):2190-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.2320. Epub 2015 May 18.
This study sought to define and identify drivers of trends in cost and use of targeted therapeutics among privately insured nonelderly patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy between 2001 and 2011.
We classified oncology drugs as targeted oral anticancer medications, targeted intravenous anticancer medications, and all others. Using the LifeLink Health Plan Claims Database, we studied and disaggregated trends in use and in insurance and out-of-pocket payments per patient per month and during the first year of chemotherapy.
We found a large increase in the use of targeted intravenous anticancer medications and a gradual increase in targeted oral anticancer medications; targeted therapies accounted for 63% of all chemotherapy expenditures in 2011. Insurance payments per patient per month and in the first year of chemotherapy for targeted oral anticancer medications more than doubled in 10 years, surpassing payments for targeted intravenous anticancer medications, which remained fairly constant throughout. Substitution toward targeted therapies and growth in drug prices both at launch and postlaunch contributed to payer spending growth. Out-of-pocket spending for targeted oral anticancer medications was ≤ half of the amount for targeted intravenous anticancer medications.
Targeted therapies now dominate anticancer drug spending. More aggressive management of pharmacy benefits for targeted oral anticancer medications and payment reform for injectable drugs hold promise. Restraining the rapid rise in spending will require more than current oral drug parity laws, such as value-based insurance that makes the benefits and costs transparent and involves the patient directly in the choice of treatment.
本研究旨在确定并找出2001年至2011年间接受化疗的非老年癌症患者中,靶向治疗药物的成本和使用趋势的驱动因素。
我们将肿瘤药物分为靶向口服抗癌药物、靶向静脉注射抗癌药物以及其他所有药物。利用LifeLink健康计划理赔数据库,我们研究并分解了每位患者每月以及化疗第一年的使用情况、保险支付和自付费用的趋势。
我们发现靶向静脉注射抗癌药物的使用大幅增加,靶向口服抗癌药物逐渐增加;2011年靶向治疗占所有化疗支出的63%。靶向口服抗癌药物每位患者每月以及化疗第一年的保险支付在10年内增加了一倍多,超过了靶向静脉注射抗癌药物的支付,后者在整个期间保持相当稳定。向靶向治疗的替代以及药物上市时和上市后的价格上涨都导致了支付方支出的增长。靶向口服抗癌药物的自付费用不到靶向静脉注射抗癌药物的一半。
靶向治疗目前主导着抗癌药物支出。对靶向口服抗癌药物的药房福利进行更积极的管理以及对注射药物进行支付改革有望取得成效。抑制支出的快速增长需要的不仅仅是当前的口服药物平价法,例如基于价值的保险,使福利和成本透明,并让患者直接参与治疗选择。