Kawabata Hideaki, Kawakatsu Yukino, Yamaguchi Katsutoshi, Sone Daiki, Inoue Naonori, Ueda Yuki, Okazaki Yuji, Hitomi Misuzu, Miyata Masatoshi, Motoi Shigehiro, Fukuda Kenichirou, Shimizu Yoshihiro
Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Gastroenterology Res. 2019 Aug;12(4):191-197. doi: 10.14740/gr1207. Epub 2019 Aug 25.
The usefulness of prophylactic biliary stenting for patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS) and gallstones (GS) to prevent recurrent biliary events after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and CBDS extraction before elective cholecystectomy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of recurrent CBDS around the perioperative period and clarify its risk factors.
The clinical data of all patients who received prophylactic biliary stenting after EST for CBDS and later underwent cholecystectomy for GS followed by stent extraction in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The numbers of residual CBDS at the end first and second endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) studies were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a logistic regression model to determine risk factors for recurrent CBDS in the perioperative period.
Forty-two consecutive patients received prophylactic biliary stenting and subsequent cholecystectomy for GS. Three of these patients were excluded from this study because the number of residual stones was not confirmed. The median maximum CBDS diameter at second ERC was 0 mm (range, 0 - 10 mm); six patients had multiple CBDS (≥ 5). The number of CBDS at second ERC was increased in comparison to that at the first ERC in 15 patients (38.4%), and was unchanged or decreased in 24 patients. The median minimum cystic duct diameter was 4 mm (range, 1 - 8 mm). The median interval between first ERC and operation was 26 days (range, 2 - 131 days). The median interval between operation and second ERC was 41 days (range, 26 - 96 days). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was performed in 38 patients, one of whom was converted from LC to open cholecystectomy. Postoperative complications (transient bacteremia) occurred in one patient. The cystic duct diameter was an independent risk factor for an increased number of CBDS at second ERC in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio 0.611 (95% confidence interval (0.398 - 0.939)), P = 0.03).
Recurrent CBDS around the perioperative period of cholecystectomy is not a rare complication after EST and the removal of CBDS with concomitant GS. Prophylactic biliary stenting is considered useful for preventing CBDS-associated complications, especially for patients in whom the cystic duct diameter is larger (≥ 5 mm).
对于胆总管结石(CBDS)和胆囊结石(GS)患者,在择期胆囊切除术前行内镜括约肌切开术(EST)和CBDS取出术后,预防性胆管支架置入术预防复发性胆管事件的有效性仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估围手术期复发性CBDS的风险并阐明其危险因素。
回顾性分析我院所有在EST治疗CBDS后接受预防性胆管支架置入术,随后因GS行胆囊切除术并取出支架的患者的临床资料。比较首次和第二次内镜逆行胆管造影(ERC)检查结束时残留CBDS的数量。使用逻辑回归模型进行单因素和多因素分析,以确定围手术期复发性CBDS的危险因素。
42例连续患者接受了预防性胆管支架置入术及随后的GS胆囊切除术。其中3例患者因未确认残留结石数量而被排除在本研究之外。第二次ERC时CBDS的最大直径中位数为0 mm(范围0 - 10 mm);6例患者有多个CBDS(≥5个)。15例患者(38.4%)第二次ERC时CBDS的数量较第一次ERC时增加,24例患者数量未变或减少。胆囊管最小直径中位数为4 mm(范围1 - 8 mm)。第一次ERC与手术之间的间隔时间中位数为26天(范围2 - 131天)。手术与第二次ERC之间的间隔时间中位数为41天(范围26 - 96天)。38例患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC),其中1例由LC转为开腹胆囊切除术。1例患者发生术后并发症(短暂菌血症)。多因素分析中,胆囊管直径是第二次ERC时CBDS数量增加的独立危险因素(比值比0.611(95%置信区间(0.398 - 0.939)),P = 0.03)。
胆囊切除术围手术期复发性CBDS是EST及取出CBDS并伴有GS后并不罕见的并发症。预防性胆管支架置入术被认为有助于预防与CBDS相关的并发症,尤其是胆囊管直径较大(≥5 mm)的患者。