Suppr超能文献

平衡、步态、功能和力量:老年人跌倒者与非跌倒者的比较。

Balance, gait, functionality and strength: comparison between elderly fallers and non-fallers.

机构信息

Departamento de Educação Física, Centro de Estudos do Comportamento Motor, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Phys Ther. 2015 Mar-Apr;19(2):146-51. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0085. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accidental falls are a major health problem related to aging and affect one in every three elderly individuals over the age of sixty.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the muscle strength, gait kinematics parameters, and performance in functional tests between elderly subjects with and without a prior history of falls. In addition, the association between the history of falls and the variables that demonstrated differences between groups were tested.

METHOD

62 elderly subjects participated in the study and were allocated to the group with falls history (FG; n=20; 68.0 ± 6.9 years old) or the group without falls history (CG; n=42; 65.5 ± 4.1 years old). Maximal strength, gait kinematics parameters, and functional tests were tested.

RESULTS

The FG showed lower muscle strength in the knee flexors (51.45 ± 8.6 vs. 62.09 ± 19 Kg), lower average toe clearance during the swing phase (0.04 ± 0.006 vs. 0.043 ± 0.005 m), and lower performance in the "8-foot up-and-go" test (5.3 ± 0.7 vs. 5.8 ± 0.7 s) (p<0.05). There were no associations between any variables and falls, but the increased time in the "8-foot up-and-go" test may double the likelihood of a fall occurring.

CONCLUSION

Fallers have reduced lower limb strength, gait alterations, the worst performance in the dynamic balance test, and an increased risk of falls.

摘要

背景

意外跌倒与衰老有关,是一个主要的健康问题,六十岁以上的老年人每三人中就有一人会遭遇跌倒。

目的

评估和比较有跌倒史和无跌倒史的老年人之间的肌肉力量、步态运动学参数和功能测试表现。此外,还测试了跌倒史与组间差异变量之间的关系。

方法

62 名老年人参与了研究,并被分为有跌倒史组(FG;n=20;68.0±6.9 岁)或无跌倒史组(CG;n=42;65.5±4.1 岁)。测试了最大力量、步态运动学参数和功能测试。

结果

FG 组的膝关节屈肌力量较低(51.45±8.6 与 62.09±19 Kg),摆动相平均足尖离地高度较低(0.04±0.006 与 0.043±0.005 m),“8 英尺起立行走”测试的表现较差(5.3±0.7 与 5.8±0.7 s)(p<0.05)。任何变量与跌倒之间均无关联,但“8 英尺起立行走”测试的时间增加可能使跌倒的可能性增加一倍。

结论

跌倒者下肢力量减弱、步态改变、动态平衡测试表现最差,跌倒风险增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f65e/4481835/ce22f674545d/rbfis-19-02-0146-gf01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验