Suppr超能文献

奖赏/努力权衡中的去甲肾上腺素能和多巴胺能神经元:行为学猕猴的直接电生理比较

Noradrenaline and dopamine neurons in the reward/effort trade-off: a direct electrophysiological comparison in behaving monkeys.

作者信息

Varazzani Chiara, San-Galli Aurore, Gilardeau Sophie, Bouret Sebastien

机构信息

Motivation, Brain, and Behavior Team, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, 75013 Paris, France, Frontières du Vivant, Université Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France, and.

Motivation, Brain, and Behavior Team, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, 75013 Paris, France.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2015 May 20;35(20):7866-77. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0454-15.2015.

Abstract

Motivation determines multiple aspects of behavior, including action selection and energization of behavior. Several components of the underlying neural systems have been examined closely, but the specific role of the different neuromodulatory systems in motivation remains unclear. Here, we compare directly the activity of dopaminergic neurons from the substantia nigra pars compacta and noradrenergic neurons from the locus coeruleus in monkeys performing a task manipulating the reward/effort trade-off. Consistent with previous reports, dopaminergic neurons encoded the expected reward, but we found that they also anticipated the upcoming effort cost in connection with its negative influence on action selection. Conversely, the firing of noradrenergic neurons increased with both pupil dilation and effort production in relation to the energization of behavior. Therefore, this work underlines the contribution of dopamine to effort-based decision making and uncovers a specific role of noradrenaline in energizing behavior to face challenges.

摘要

动机决定行为的多个方面,包括行动选择和行为的激发。潜在神经系统的几个组成部分已被仔细研究,但不同神经调节系统在动机中的具体作用仍不清楚。在这里,我们直接比较了在执行一项操纵奖励/努力权衡任务的猴子中,黑质致密部多巴胺能神经元和蓝斑去甲肾上腺素能神经元的活动。与之前的报道一致,多巴胺能神经元编码预期奖励,但我们发现它们也预期即将到来的努力成本及其对行动选择的负面影响。相反,去甲肾上腺素能神经元的放电随着瞳孔扩张和与行为激发相关的努力产生而增加。因此,这项工作强调了多巴胺对基于努力的决策的贡献,并揭示了去甲肾上腺素在激发行为以应对挑战方面的特定作用。

相似文献

4
Noradrenaline and dopamine: sharing the Workload.去甲肾上腺素和多巴胺:共同承担工作负荷。
Trends Neurosci. 2015 Aug;38(8):465-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Catecholamines reduce choice history biases in perceptual decision making.儿茶酚胺可减少知觉决策中的选择历史偏差。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Sep 3;23(9):e3003361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003361. eCollection 2025 Sep.
5
Impaired effort allocation in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中努力分配受损。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025 Jul 15;42:100378. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100378. eCollection 2025 Dec.

本文引用的文献

10
Neurocomputational account of how the human brain decides when to have a break.人类大脑何时休息的神经计算解释。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 12;110(7):2641-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211925110. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验