Jules-Elysee Kethy M, Goon Amanda K, Westrich Geoffrey H, Padgett Douglas E, Mayman David J, Ranawat Amar S, Ranawat Chitranjan S, Lin Yi, Kahn Richard L, Bhagat Devan D, Goytizolo Enrique A, Ma Yan, Reid Shane C, Curren Jodie, YaDeau Jacques T
Departments of Anesthesiology (K.M.J.-E., A.K.G., Y.L., R.L.K., D.D.B., E.A.G., S.C.R., J.C., J.T.Y.) and Orthopedic Surgery (G.H.W., D.E.P., D.J.M., A.S.R., C.S.R.), Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021. E-mail address for K.M. Jules-Elysee:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Avenue, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20052. E-mail address:
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 May 20;97(10):789-98. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00698.
The optimal postoperative analgesia after primary total hip arthroplasty remains in question. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the use of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with use of a multimodal pain regimen including periarticular injection (PAI). We hypothesized that PAI would lead to earlier readiness for discharge, decreased opioid consumption, and lower pain scores.
Forty-one patients received PAI, and forty-three patients received PCEA. Preoperatively, both groups were administered dexamethasone (6 mg, orally). The PAI group received a clonidine patch and sustained-release oxycodone (10 mg), while the PCEA group had placebo. Both groups received combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and used an epidural pain pump postoperatively; the PAI group had normal saline solution, while the PCEA group had bupivacaine and hydromorphone. The primary outcome, readiness for discharge, required the discontinuation of the epidural, a pain score of <4 (numeric rating scale) without parenteral narcotics, normal eating, minimal nausea, urination without a catheter, a dry surgical wound, no acute medical problems, and the ability to independently transfer and walk 12.2 m (40 ft).
The mean time to readiness for discharge (and standard deviation) was 2.4 ± 0.7 days (PAI) compared with 2.3 ± 0.8 days (PCEA) (p = 0.86). The mean length of stay was 3.0 ± 0.8 days (PAI) compared with 3.1 ± 0.7 days (PCEA) (p = 0.46). A significant mean difference in pain score of 0.74 with ambulation (p = 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 1.31) and 0.80 during physical therapy (p = 0.03; 95% CI, 0.09 to 1.51) favored the PCEA group. The mean opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents in milligrams) was significantly higher in the PAI group on postoperative day 0 (43 ± 21 compared with 28 ± 23; p = 0.002) and postoperative days 0 through 2 (136 ± 59 compared with 90 ± 79; p = 0.004). Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale (ORSDS) composite scores for severity and bothersomeness as well as scores for nausea, vomiting, and itchiness were significantly higher in the PCEA group (p < 0.05). Quality of Recovery-40 scores and patient satisfaction were similar.
PAI did not decrease the time to discharge and was associated with higher pain scores and greater opioid consumption but lower ORSDS scores compared with PCEA. The choice for analgesic regimen may depend on a particular patient's threshold for pain and the potential side effects.
初次全髋关节置换术后的最佳术后镇痛方法仍存在争议。这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究比较了患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)与包括关节周围注射(PAI)在内的多模式镇痛方案的使用情况。我们假设PAI会使患者更早具备出院条件,减少阿片类药物的使用,并降低疼痛评分。
41例患者接受PAI,43例患者接受PCEA。术前,两组均口服地塞米松(6毫克)。PAI组接受可乐定贴片和缓释羟考酮(10毫克),而PCEA组使用安慰剂。两组均接受腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉,术后使用硬膜外镇痛泵;PAI组使用生理盐水,而PCEA组使用布比卡因和氢吗啡酮。主要结局指标,即出院准备情况,要求停用硬膜外镇痛、疼痛评分<4(数字评分量表)且无需胃肠外使用麻醉剂、正常饮食、轻微恶心、无导尿管排尿、手术伤口干燥、无急性医疗问题,以及能够独立转移和行走12.2米(40英尺)。
PAI组达到出院准备的平均时间(及标准差)为2.4±0.7天,而PCEA组为2.3±0.8天(p = 0.