Wikström Niklas, Kainulainen Kent, Razafimandimbison Sylvain G, Smedmark Jenny E E, Bremer Birgitta
Bergius Foundation, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, SE-10691, Stockholm, Sweden.
University of Bergen, University Museum of Bergen, The Natural History Collections, Post Box 7800, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway.
PLoS One. 2015 May 21;10(5):e0126690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126690. eCollection 2015.
Divergence time analyses in the coffee family (Rubiaceae) have all relied on the same Gentianales crown group age estimate, reported by an earlier analysis of the asterids, for defining the upper age bound of the root node in their analyses. However, not only did the asterid analysis suffer from several analytical shortcomings, but the estimate itself has been used in highly inconsistent ways in these Rubiaceae analyses. Based on the original data, we here reanalyze the divergence times of the asterids using relaxed-clock models and 14 fossil-based minimum age constraints. We also expand the data set to include an additional 67 taxa from Rubiaceae sampled across all three subfamilies recognized in the family. Three analyses are conducted: a separate analysis of the asterids, which completely mirrors the original asterid analysis in terms of taxon sample and data; a separate analysis of the Gentianales, where the result from the first analysis is used for defining a secondary root calibration point; and a combined analysis where all taxa are analyzed simultaneously. Results are presented in the form of a time-calibrated phylogeny, and age estimates for asterid groups, Gentianales, and major groups of Rubiaceae are compared and discussed in relation to previously published estimates. Our updated age estimates for major groups of Rubiaceae provide a significant step forward towards the long term goal of establishing a robust temporal framework for the divergence of this biologically diverse and fascinating group of plants.
茜草科的分歧时间分析均依赖于与菊类植物冠群年龄估计相同的结果,该结果由早期对菊类植物的分析报告得出,用于确定其分析中根节点的年龄上限。然而,菊类植物分析不仅存在若干分析缺陷,而且该估计值在这些茜草科分析中的使用方式也极不一致。基于原始数据,我们在此使用宽松时钟模型和14个基于化石的最小年龄限制,重新分析菊类植物的分歧时间。我们还扩大了数据集,纳入了茜草科所有三个公认亚科的另外67个分类群。进行了三项分析:对菊类植物进行单独分析,在分类群样本和数据方面完全照搬原始的菊类植物分析;对龙胆目进行单独分析,将第一次分析的结果用于定义二级根校准点;以及进行联合分析,同时对所有分类群进行分析。结果以时间校准系统发育树的形式呈现,并将菊类植物类群、龙胆目和茜草科主要类群的年龄估计与先前发表的估计值进行比较和讨论。我们对茜草科主要类群的更新年龄估计朝着为这一生物多样且迷人的植物类群的分歧建立一个稳健的时间框架这一长期目标迈出了重要一步。