Suppr超能文献

伴侣间的关系权力、沟通与暴力:南非某城镇一项整群随机 HIV 预防研究的结果

Relationship power, communication, and violence among couples: results of a cluster-randomized HIV prevention study in a South African township.

作者信息

Minnis Alexandra M, Doherty Irene A, Kline Tracy L, Zule William A, Myers Bronwyn, Carney Tara, Wechsberg Wendee M

机构信息

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA ; School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA ; University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Int J Womens Health. 2015 May 11;7:517-25. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S77398. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inequitable gender-based power in relationships and intimate partner violence contribute to persistently high rates of HIV infection among South African women. We examined the effects of two group-based HIV prevention interventions that engaged men and their female partners together in a couples intervention (Couples Health CoOp [CHC]) and a gender-separate intervention (Men's Health CoOp/Women's Health CoOp [MHC/WHC]) on women's reports of power, communication, and conflict in relationships.

METHODS

The cluster-randomized field experiment included heterosexual couples from a high-density South African township in which neighborhoods were randomized to one of the intervention arms or a control arm that received the WHC only. Participants completed in-person study visits at baseline and 6-month follow-up. We examined group differences using one-way analysis of variance and multivariable regression models.

RESULTS

Of the 290 couples enrolled, 255 women remained in the same partnership over 6 months. Following the intervention, women in the CHC arm compared with those in the WHC arm were more likely to report an increase in relationship control (β=0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02, 1.83, P=0.045) and gender norms supporting female autonomy in relationships (β=0.99, 95% CI: 0.07, 1.91, P=0.035). Women in the MHC/WHC arm were more likely to report increases in relationship equity, relative to those in the CHC arm, and had a higher odds of reporting no victimization during the previous 3 months (MHC/WHC vs WHC: odds ratio =3.05, 95% CI: 1.55, 6.0, P=0.001; CHC vs MHC/WHC: odds ratio =0.38, 95% CI: 0.20, 0.74, P=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Male partner engagement in either the gender-separate or couples-based interventions led to modest improvements in gender power, adoption of more egalitarian gender norms, and reductions in relationship conflict for females. The aspects of relationship power that improved, however, varied between the couples and gender-separate conditions, highlighting the need for further attention to development of both gender-separate and couples interventions.

摘要

背景

恋爱关系中基于性别的不平等权力以及亲密伴侣暴力导致南非女性的艾滋病毒感染率持续居高不下。我们研究了两种基于群体的艾滋病毒预防干预措施的效果,这两种措施将男性及其女性伴侣纳入夫妻干预(夫妻健康合作社[CHC])和性别分开的干预(男性健康合作社/女性健康合作社[MHC/WHC]),以了解女性对恋爱关系中权力、沟通和冲突的报告情况。

方法

这项整群随机现场试验纳入了来自南非一个高密度城镇的异性恋夫妻,其中社区被随机分配到一个干预组或一个仅接受女性健康合作社干预的对照组。参与者在基线和6个月随访时完成了现场研究访问。我们使用单因素方差分析和多变量回归模型来检验组间差异。

结果

在纳入的290对夫妻中,255名女性在6个月内保持了相同的伴侣关系。干预后,与女性健康合作社组的女性相比,夫妻健康合作社组的女性更有可能报告恋爱关系控制权增加(β=0.92,95%置信区间[CI]:0.02,1.83,P=0.045)以及支持恋爱关系中女性自主权的性别规范增加(β=0.99,95%CI:0.07,1.91,P=0.035)。与夫妻健康合作社组的女性相比,男性健康合作社/女性健康合作社组的女性更有可能报告恋爱关系公平性增加,并且在过去3个月内报告未遭受侵害的几率更高(男性健康合作社/女性健康合作社组与女性健康合作社组:优势比=3.05,95%CI:1.55,6.0,P=0.001;夫妻健康合作社组与男性健康合作社/女性健康合作社组:优势比=0.38,95%CI:0.20,0.74,P=0.004)。

结论

男性伴侣参与性别分开或基于夫妻的干预措施,使女性在性别权力方面有适度改善,采用了更平等的性别规范,并减少了恋爱关系冲突。然而,恋爱关系权力改善的方面在夫妻干预组和性别分开干预组之间有所不同,这突出表明需要进一步关注性别分开和夫妻干预措施的发展。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Putting women and girls at the center of development.将妇女和女童置于发展核心。
Science. 2014 Sep 12;345(6202):1273-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1258882.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验